CBSE

In this page you can find An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum Extra Questions and Answers Class 12 English Flamingo, Extra Questions for Class 12 English will make your practice complete.

An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum Extra Questions and Answers Class 12 English Flamingo

An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
How does the poet describe the classroom walls?
Answer:
According to the poet, the walls of the classroom are discoloured and have a faded look which looks like sour cream. The poet compares the faded walls to that of the faces of the children who look pale.

Question 2.
“So blot their maps with slums as big as doom,” says Stephen Spender. What does the poet want to convey?
Answer:
The poet is requesting to provide a clean atmosphere. The world maps create just an illusion. He is telling that the teachers and rulers must take these children out in the open green fields and golden beaches.

Question 3.
What does the poet want for the children of the slums?
OR
What does Stephen Spender want to be done for the children of the school in a slum?
Answer:
The poet wants the children of the slum to get rid of the dull and morbid state of affairs of the school. They should be provided with basic civic amenities, proper educational infrastructure, and great accessible opportunities to explore the world outside with its gifts and bounties. The poet wishes good education for the children of the slums as he thinks that it is only education that can free these children from the shackles of poverty.

Question 4.
In spite of despair and disease pervading the lives of the slum children, they are not devoid of hope. How far do you agree?
Answer:
The burden of poverty and disease crushes the slum children physically. They are denied basic amenities of food, shelter and education. Despite living in deprivation, these children fight the battle of life courageously. They still dream and hope for a better future.

Question 5.
The poet says, ‘And yet, for these children, these windows, not this map, their world…’ Which world do these children belong to? Which world is inaccessible to them?
Answer:
In these words, the poet wants to convey that the slum children have never gone out of the slum, so the world map was meaningless in the classroom. It was only through the open window of the classroom, that they could see the world outside. So he wants the window to be made bigger and the children should be able to come out and see the outside world for themselves.

Question 6.
What is the theme of the poem, ‘An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum’?
Answer:
The poem, ‘An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum’ highlights the theme of social injustice and class inequalities in the society. The meaninglessness of having such schools in the slums is brought out. The poet wants meaningful education for the slum children which will liberate their minds and pave a way for them for a better future.

Question 7.
What is the irony in ‘run azure on gold sands?’
Answer:
Gold sands refer to the sand of deserts while azure is the colour of the nature in spring season. Nothing grows in the desert. The world of the poor children is also like the desert sand. The irony in the expression is the impossibility of spring in the desert land.

Question 8.
Explain; ‘From fog to endless night.’
Answer:
It describes the miserable life of the slum children. From morning till night, these children make desperate attempts to live life despite all odds. Their life is full of misery, hopelessness and suffering.

Question 9.
What is the message that Stephen Spender wants to convey through this poem?
OR
What message does Stephen Spender convey through the poem, ‘An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum’?
Answer:
The need is to free these children, liberate them and bring them into the mainstream by bringing meaningful changes to improve the standard of life and education in the slums. The poet deals with the theme of social injustice and class inequalities. There are two different worlds. Art, culture and literature have no relevance to the slum children. They live in dark, narrow, cramped holes and lanes. Unless the gap between the two worlds is abridged, there can’t be any real progress or development. The children will have to be made mentally and physically free to lead happy lives.

Question 10.
How does the poem, ‘An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum’ portray the children?
Answer:
The slum children in an elementary school look pathetic. They are undernourished and diseased. Their unkempt and dull hair has been compared to rootless weeds. One of the girls is apparently burdened with the miseries of poverty. Another boy has inherited his father’s diseases and has stunted growth.

Question 11.
How is ‘Shakespeare wicked and the map a bad example’ for the children of the school in a slum?
Answer:
Both represent a beautiful world and high values which the slum children will have never experienced. Since the slum children cannot relate to these things, there was no point in giving such examples.

Question 12.
What does Stephen Spender want for the children of the slums?
Answer:
Stephen Spender wants that slum children should be taken care of by providing them facilities to make their survival fit and to gift them the fruits of literacy. He urges people to help these slum children come out of poverty and oppression of the power.

An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Which words/phrases in the poem ‘An Elementary School Classroom in a Slum’ show that the slum children are suffering from acute malnutrition?
Answer:
There are many words and phrases in the poem that show the slum children are suffering from malnutrition. These words and phrases are hair torn round their pallor’, ‘tall girl with her weighed-down’ head, ‘the paper seeming boy’ and ‘the stunted heir of twisted bones’.

Question 2.
Write in brief the summary of the poem.
Answer:
The poet describes some children sitting in an elementary school. This school is situated in a slum. The children sitting here present a very miserable view. Their hair are like weeds and scattered on their pale face. Then the poet describes a tall girl. She is sitting with her head bent. There is a small and thin looking boy. His eyes are like that of a rat’s eyes. Then there is an another boy who has disease of swollen and twisted bones and joints. He has got his disease from his father.

The poet notices a young and sweet boy sitting at the back of the class. He is perhaps dreaming about the squirrel’s game. He is perhaps dreaming of having such tree-room for him¬self also. The poet says that the walls of the classroom are cream. They smell like sour cream. There is a bust of Shakespeare in the classroom. There are pictures of big church and the Tyrolese valley having bell-shaped flowers. There is an open-handed map, which shows all the places of the world. But ironically for the children living in the slum their world is not that map but only the scene that can be seen outside the window of their classroom.

The poet says that it will be useless to talk about Shakespeare to the children in the classroom. He even says that Shakespeare is wicked. The big map with all its places, ships and so on tempts the children to steal. These children have to spend their lives in small homes. Their lives are nothing but an endless night. The children have grown so weak that their bones could be seen from their skin. Many of these wear spectacles, and these spectacles have mended glass.

The poet appeals to the governor, inspector and the visitors to do something for the poor children. The poet wants that the children should be shown green fields; they should be allowed to live a free and carefree life. Without any worry they can concentrate well on their studies. The poet says only those people create history who are carefree.

Question 3.
Write the central idea of the poem in detail.
Answer:
This poem is about the children who are living in a slum. They are mostly suffering from malnutrition. In their classroom, there are many beautiful pictures. There is an open handed map and the bust of. Shakespeare. The poet wants that these children should be taken out of their slum and they should be shown green fields and be allowed to run freely. Therefore, he appeals to the officials to do some thing for the children.

The poet says that only those people can create history who can enjoy anything under the sun. Therefore, the poet wants that these children should also be provided proper facilities so that they can grow into useful citizens.

Question 4.
Why does the Stephen Spender say that the pictures and maps in the elementary school classroom are not meaningful ?
Answer:
The poet says that there is a bust of Shakespeare in the classroom. There are pictures of a big church and the Tyrolese valley having bell-shaped flowers. There is an open-handed map, which shows all the places of the world. But ironically for the children living in the slum their world is not that map but only the scene that can be seen outside the window of their classroom. Therefore, the pictures and maps on the wall are meaningless.

In this page you can find Going Places Extra Questions and Answers Class 12 English Flamingo, Extra Questions for Class 12 English will make your practice complete.

Going Places Extra Questions and Answers Class 12 English Flamingo

Going Places Lesson Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Why did Sophie wish to become an actress?
Answer:
Sophie was interested in a boutique. For this, she needed money. So, she thought that she should become an actress as there was real money in that. Then she could have a boutique too.

Question 2.
What was Geoff doing and how did he go to his work?
Answer:
Geoff was Sophie’s elder brother. He had been out of school for three years and was almost grown up. He was an apprentice mechanic. He used to travel to his work each day to the far side of the city on his motor bike.

Question 3.
“And she was jealous of his silence.” Why was Sophie jealous of Geoff’s silence?
Answer:
Sophie’s brother Geoff spoke very less. She was jealous of him as she thought that when he was not speaking it was as though he was away somewhere out there in the world in those places she had never been to.

Question 4.
What was the special fascination of the teenager Sophie?
Answer:
The unknown outlying districts of her city, unknown places beyond her country, and the world of places where she had never been were great fascination for Sophie. She wished to know about exotic places. She hoped to go there with her brother Geoff.

Question 5.
What did Geoff mean by saying, ‘Casey must have strings of girls’?
Answer:
Sophie wanted Geoff to promise not to tell daddy about her meeting with Danny Casey. He would get angry at her badly. Then Geoff told that Casey must be having a large number of girls in his contact, and she was still a schoolgirl. But Sophie pointed out that Casey was quiet. He did not have strings of girls.

Question 6.
What was the autograph riddle? Could it be solved?
Answer:
On first meeting, Danny Casey at Royce’s window, Sophie asked his autograph for little Derek. But neither had a paper nor a pen. In the second real meeting at the Royce’s, the same riddle stood unsolved—the autograph couldn’t be given neither had a pen.

Question 7.
What was Jansie’s attitude towards Sophie on hearing about her meeting Danny Casey?
Answer:
Geoff told Frank that Sophie met Danny Casey. Frank’s sister Jansie was nosey. She asked Sophie about the meeting. It surprised Sophie because she had termed it a secret. She felt at ease when she realised that Geoff had not let her down.

Question 8.
Write a character sketch of Jansie.
Answer:
Jansie belonged to a middle class family. Though she was sensible and practical, she was nosey. She loved to gossip. She did not have high ambitions in life like Sophie. She knew that she was earmarked to work in a biscuit factory.

Question 9.
What was going on in Sophie’s mind about people and places unknown to her?
OR
What were Sophie’s views about the vast world around?
Answer:
The unknown far off places even beyond the surrounding country had a great attraction in Sophie’s mind. She wanted to see, meet exotic and interesting people of whom Geoff never spoke. She was impatient to know them. She thought the world was waiting to welcome her.

Question 10.
What did Sophie tell Geoff about Danny Casey?
Answer:
Danny Casey was a young Irish player of the United first squad. Sophie told Geoff of the meeting Danny Casey at Royce’s window. It surprised him and he wanted to know the truth. She told about Danny Casey’s gentle green eyes. She told him that she talked with him first and also asked for an autograph. But they had neither pen nor paper. So he promised to do it next week, if she cared.

Question 11.
Why did Sophie like Danny Casey?
Answer:
The young Irish Danny Casey was a sports icon. He was gentle and calm. He was handsome and always impressively dressed. He was tall and handsome with a strong dark face. She imagined him to be fit for her love.

Question 12.
What did Sophie imagine about her meeting with Danny Casey?
OR
Write Sophie’s description about her first meeting with Danny Casey.
Answer:
Sophie told that she met Danny Casey at the Royce’s window. She was looking at her clothes there. He came and stood beside her. She spoke to him first and asked if he was Danny Casey. He confirmed, she asked for an autograph but neither had paper nor a pen. They talked a bit. He assured her of an autograph next week, if she cared.

Question 13.
What was the weekly pilgrimage in the story, ‘Going Places’?
Answer:
Their weekly pilgrimage on Saturday was to watch the United match. Actually she got interested in Danny Casey and wanted to see his game and watch him playing at the United on Saturday. Sophie with her lather and litde Derek sat near the goal, and Geoff went up with his friends. They boost up Danny’s morale and got thrilled at his scoring goal.

Question 14.
What did Sophie tell Jansie about her meeting with Danny Casey?
Answer:
Next week when Jansie met Sophie, she asked her about meeting Danny Casey. Though Sophie got surprised and damned her brother Geoff, yet she called it something special between them. Something secret but not a Jansie type. Jansie promised to keep it a secret. Sophie told it was a litde thing, she asked for an autograph but neither had a pen.

Question 15.
‘It was a perfect place, she had always thought so.’ Which is the place described and what made it so perfect?
Answer:
For the fancy date, Sophie walked by the canal in the evening. She used to play there in her childhood. She reached the wooden bench beneath the solitary elm tree. She sat and waited there for Danny Casey. It was a perfect place for the lovers, who wished not to be observed.

Question 16.
What was Sophie’s ambition in life? How did she hope to achieve that?
Answer:
Sophie wanted to be a manager, like Mary Quaint and have the most amazing shop, or an actress, or have a boutique or a fashion designer. She wanted to make money and fulfil her sophisticated wish.

Question 17.
Sophie was dreaming of so many things in her life. What were they?
Answer:
Sophie was a dreamer as she wanted to be a manager till she had enough money to have a boutique or an actress as there was real money in it, or fashion designer, something a bit sophisticated.

Question 18.
Why did Jansie discourage Sophie from having dreams?
Answer:
Jansie discouraged Sophie from having dreams because the latter was unrealistic and had unattainable visions. Jansie knew that they were earmarked for the biscuit factory as she was practical, and she thought reasonably how tough and challenging life could be.

Question 19.
What did Sophie imagine about her brother, Geoff?
Answer:
Sophie imagined that when her brother Geoff is silent, his mind goes to all the new places that beyond the surrounding country. He meets new people, who are exotic and interesting.

Question 20.
What did Sophie tell Geoff about her ‘meeting’ with Danny Casey?
Answer:
Sophie told Geoff that she met Danny Casey while she was staring at the clothes in Royce’s window. She started the conversation and then asked for an autograph. But neither of them had any paper or pen, so Danny Casey asked Sophie if she would meet him again for an autograph.

Question 21.
Why did Sophie not want Jansie to know about her meeting with Danny?
Answer:
Sophie did not want Jansie to know anything about her meeting with Danny Casey because she knew that Jansie would spread the news to the whole neighbourhood. Sophie did not want to be ridiculed before others.

Going Places Lesson Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
How did Geoff and Sophie’s father react when they came to know that Sophie had met Danny Casey?
Answer:
Sophie’s father and her brother, Geoff were very much fascinated with Danny Casey, whom they regarded a great player. When Sophie told Geoff that she had met Danny Casey, he did not seem to believe her. That is why, he inquired of her what Danny Casey looked like. She told him in detail how she happened to meet Danny Casey in the arcade. She even told him that Danny Casey’s eyes were green and gentle, and he was not so tall.

Perhaps that is why, Geoff told his father that Sophie had met Danny Casey and it was true.But when Geoff told his father about Sophie having met Danny Casey, he gave an expression of contempt. Her father did not believe it to be true. He told Sophie that it was another of her “wild stories”.

Question 2.
Compare and contrast Sophie and Jansie, highlighting their temperaments and aspirations.
Answer:
Sophie and Jansie are classmates. They belong to lower middle class families. Both of them are earmarked for biscuit factory. Jansie’s feet are firmly planted on the ground. But Sophie is totally blind to the harsh realities of life. She dreams of big and beautiful things. She wants to have a boutique. She thinks of becoming an actress as there is a lot of money in this profession. If need be, she can also be a fashion designer. In short, she loves to be grand and sophisticated.

All her dreams are beyond her reach and resources. Jansie advises her to be sensible, but she remains a romantic dreamer. Sophie and Jansie differ in thinking and temperament. Sophie is lost in her dream world. She shares her secret with only one person. It is her elder brother, Geoff. Jansie is ‘nosey’. She takes interest in learning new things about others.

She can spread the story in the whole neighbourhood; so Sophie does not want to share secrets with her. Sophie is an incurable dreamer and escapist. She adores young Irish footballer Danny Casey. She develops a fascination for him. She becomes sad and helpless, but she doesn’t become wiser. She remains a dreamer. Jansie is practical and a realist. She has no such unrealistic dreams.

Question 3.
Do you think Sophie is overambitious and Jansie is more practical? Discuss.
Answer:
Sophie and Jansie are class fellows and friends. They belong to lower middle class families. Jansie understands her limitations well. She knows that both of them are earmarked for the biscuit factory. But Sophie is totally blind to the harsh realities of life. She dreams of big and beautiful things. She wants to have a boutique. She also entertains the idea of becoming an actress. She loves to be nice, grand and sophisticated. All her dreams are beyond her reach and resources. Though Jansie advises her, Sophie refuses to be sensible. She is nothing more than a romantic dreamer and is in awe of the footballer Danny Casey. Sophie and Jansie are poles apart in their thinking and temperament. Sophie is all lost to herself and her dreamy world. She is an incurable escapist. She adores the young Irish footballer Danny Casey. She remains what she always is a dreamer.

Question 4.
Sophie lives in a world full of dreams which she does not know she cannot realise.Comment.
OR
Attempt a character sketch of Sophie as a woman who lives in her dreams.
Answer:
Sophie is a young girl of a lower middle class family. Though she has been earmarked to work in the biscuit factory, she dreams of opening a boutique and also becoming an actress or a fashion designer or a manager. She dreams of coming out of her economic situation. She is an incurable dreamer and an escapist. All her dreams and disappointments are figments of her own imagination. Although she is warned against such dreams by her friend, Jansie and her father, but she ignores them. As no one believes her, she shares her dreams only with her brother, Geoff who is an introvert. She also worships the football player, Danny Casey. She fantasises about meeting Danny at the market place and later near the canal.

Question 5.
It is not unusual for a lower middle class girl to dream big. How unrealistic were Sophie’s dreams?
Answer:
Sophie is a young girl of a lower middle class family. She wants to open a boutique and also become an actress or a fashion designer or a manager. She is an incurable dreamer and an escapist. Although she was warned against such dreams by her friend, Jansie and her father but she ignores them.

Dreams are very important to go ahead in life. If there were no dreams, there would not be any progress anywhere. But being a mere dreamer is not enough. One should be realistic and practical as well. If our imagination has only wings, it will not take us anywhere unless and until we are firmly grounded also. Sophie’s dreams were just imagination, a flight of fancy which took her nowhere. She derived momentary delight from her dreams and that was all.

Question 6.
Do you think the title of the story ‘Going Places’ by A.R. Barton is appropriate? Discuss.
OR
In the story ‘Going Places’, the author A.R. Burton has successfully taken the readers to places. Elaborate.
Answer:
The author A.R. Burton has taken the readers to places through his female character Sophie. She was a very sweet and beautiful teenager, who loved fantasising. In the first phase of the journey, she took the readers in search of work. She wanted to have a superb boutique of her own or become a shop manager. She wanted to become an actress to have real money. If not that, she wanted to become a fashion designer though it was a little sophisticated. Her such thinking made her friend Jansie sad as she knew that both of them were earmarked for the biscuit factory.

In the second phase of the journey, she suspected the areas of Geoff’s life about which she knew nothing. Geoff never spoke much. When Geoff kept silent, she thought him to be away somewhere out there in the world in those places she had never seen; the adjacent areas of the neighbouring country, its people and thus, she had developed a great fascination for them. Riding behind Geoff, she took us to the world that one can easily praise.

In the final phase, from the Royce’s window to Danny Casey, the United’s first squad player. In her excitement and dreaming, Sophie waited under the elm tree near the canal. She pictured Danny Casey outside Royce’s arcade again. But here, she really could not take an autograph because neither of them had a pen. Thus, throughout the story, the reader goes on from place to place, but there is no solid result. So the title ‘Going Places’ is appropriate.

Question 7.
“Sophie’s dream world clashes with the world of her family and friends”. Bring out the stark difference between the two worlds.
Answer:
Sophie belonged to a mediocre or rather poor socio-economic background. But she aspired to have a boutique, though she had no means or money to fulfil her dreams. After school, she was likely to work in a biscuit factory.
When she told her father that she wishes to buy a boutique if she ever has money, he asks her to be practical and to rather build a decent house to live in with that money. This showed that their house was in a shabby condition. Her friend Jansie was very much aware about their financial conditions and family background. She knew that both were earmarked for the biscuit and tries to make Sophie understand the same. ‘‘However, Sophie refused to understand and remained an impractical daydreamer.

Question 8.
Teachers always advise their students to dream big. Yet, the same teachers in your classrooms find fault with Sophie when she dreams. What is wrong with Sophie’s dreams?
Answer:
It is good to dream but one needs to be practical too. Sophie belonged to a mediocre family. She aspired to own a boutique, though she had no means or money to fulfil her dreams. After school she was likely to work in a biscuit factory. Her dreams are unrealistic. She loves to indulge herself without even thinking of how to achieve it. In her heart of hearts, she knows that her dreams have little possibility of coming true and are only a product of adult fantasising. She also dream dates Danny Casey, an Irish football player.

She gets so pulled into her date story told to her brother Geoff that she was supposed to meet Danny. Irrespective of all this, Sophie fantasises about her hero, unperturbed. Dreaming within limits is good. Unless one is impossibly ambitious, hardworking, and have loads of patience and perseverance, such dreams are best kept under lock and key, unless one likes to be disappointed.

Question 9.
Every teenager has a hero/heroine to admire. So many times they become role models for them. What is wrong if Sophie fantasises about Danny Casey and is ambitious in life?
Answer:
Teenager is the phase of life which constitutes major changes in the life of an individual. During this phase, a person learns many things, sets his career goals, and deals with poor pressure and the reprimands, demands and expectations of the adults. Hence, it is natural for the teenagers to fantasise and love in a world of dreams.

It would be wrong to ridicule dreaming and fantasising, it is based on realistic goals and the world around provides them the means of opportunities to achieve these aspirations and dreams. Desiring to move ahead in life and working towards this instills confidence, positivity and optimism. However, if there is a disparity between the goal, dream and one’s capabilities, the effect could be harmful and painful. Failure could lead to disappointment, depression and a complete drop in confidence.

In short, dreaming or fantasising is not wrong, and therefore, Sophie was perfectly entitled to fantasise about her future or about her favourite footballer Danny Casey. The only problem or worry is that one should be realistic, sensible and prepared to face consequences whether good or bad with elegance.

Question 10.
Unrealistic dreams often lead to a great deal of unhappiness. Justify the statement on the basis of the story, ‘Going Places’.
Answer:
Unrealistic dreams lead to unhappiness. It is true as the world of dreams takes us away from reality. Dreams which are far away from reality put the person in difficult situation. In the story, Sophie always lived in a dream world, dreaming impossible things. She is not ready to accept the reality and always takes an imaginary flight. Only constructive dreams are like a guiding light.

They make us work harder. When dream becomes a fantasy, it does more harm than good. Just forgetting reality in the pursuit of dreams is harmful. Sophie, the protagonist in the story has been nurturing her dreams since childhood. She has taken a fancy for Danny Casey, the footballer as her hero. She refuses to accept that it is her fantasy. She is so lost in her dreams that she even imagines herself waiting for him by the canal. She goes to the extent and puts herself into load of troubles which leads to unhappiness.

Question 11.
In one’s approach to life one should be practical and not live in a world of dreams, flow is Jansie’s attitude different from that of Sophie?
Answer:
Sophie and Jansie were classmates and very good friends. Both of them belonged to a very poor socio-economic background. However, Sophie was very ambitious and had great plans of setting up a boutique of her own or be a manager in one. She would also speak of becoming an actress and would earn the requisite money to fulfil her dreams, whenever Jansie cautioned her.

According to her, working in the biscuit factory was absolutely not where she saw herself in the future. Jansie, on the other hand, was a very practical person. She advises her friend to come back to reality and out of her world of dreams. The down to earth and firm-minded Jansie knew that the castles Sophie built would only remain in the air. The attitude of the two friends very clearly shows that they were totally different in the approach to life.

Question 12.
What impression do you form of Sophie and Jansie after reading the story, ‘Going Places’?
Answer:
Sophie and Jansie, neighbours and schoolmates have opposite temperament while Sophie is imaginative, Jansie is practical. Sophie is a daydreamer and impractical. She wants to be in a glamorous career. She is an attention-seeker. She lives in a fantasy world and is always far from realty. She creates a story of her meeting Danny Casey to arouse everyone’s interest. Sophie is an escapist and gregarious, whereas Jansie’s views are grounded. She is individualistic and self-contained. She is contented, whereas Sophie is dissatisfied at her being a victim of lower middle class. She never accepts the reality that they are meant for biscuit factory.

Question 13.
In what way was Sophie’s hero worship and fantasising at odds with her socioeconomic background? Was she justified in dreaming the ‘impossible’?
Answer:
In many respects Sophie’s dreams were unrealistic. She wanted to buy a boutique, be a manager, an actress or a fashion designer. She hailed from a weak socio-economic background and did not even have a decent house. It seemed as Jansie said, that they were not made to work in a biscuit factory. Glamorous dreams about Danny Casey, the Irish soccer player and all her fantasies. Yet these dreams are justified perhaps because they take Sophie away, for some time, from the bitter reality that she cannot accept.

Question 14.
Maintaining a balance between one’s fantasies and the real world is the key to the survival. Give your opinion on Sophie’s character in the light of the above statement.
Answer:
Fantasy always takes one away from the real world. It is temporary refuge. Sophie an adolescent/teenager belongs to the poor socio-economic background. Her real world forces her to remain in the fantasy world. She always takes imaginary flight where she wants to remain. Her world is full of glamour and sophistication. Though this is a temporary refuge, but she is unable to balance both real and fantasy world. For her brother Geoff, she desires to be in his world, the places where he goes, the people he meets.

Not only this, she fantasises the famous footballer prodigy Danny Casey and tries to prove her meeting with him a real one. No one believes her but she suffers badly as it only gives her disappointments. So for survival, it is must for one to maintain balance between a fantasy and reality.

 

In this page you can find The Interview Extra Questions and Answers Class 12 English Flamingo, Extra Questions for Class 12 English will make your practice complete.

The Interview Extra Questions and Answers Class 12 English Flamingo

The Interview Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
What does the author say about the interview?
Answer:
The author believes that the interview has become commonplace of journalism. Our lives have become complicated as we have to face and pass through this vile process of screening and interaction. Many celebrities had to be interviewed daily and many of them may have to pass from it a number of times. But it is piercing, troublesome and peace-disturbing as it is the wearer who realises where the shoe pinches.

Question 2.
Write down the opinions that disfavour the cause of the interview.
Answer:
Regarding the conduction of an interview, some believe that in its highest forms, the interview is a valuable source of truth. In practice, it is nothing but a simple art. It is like stealing one’s soul. People hate the interview and call it as an unwarranted intrusion into their lives.

Question 3.
How does V.S. Naipaul feel about interview?
Answer:
V.S. Naipaul vehemently condemns the cause of the interview. He believes that it is more than losing something from our body. He says that through interviews many would lose a part of our self. In reality, it is horrific for the interviewing candidate. This is the cause why people refuse to give their consent for an interview.

Question 4.
What do Rudyard Kipling and his wife comment about the interview?
Answer:
Rudyard Kipling is a man of free and frank nature. He is more condemnatory for the attitude of the interviewer. His wife Caroline calls it immoral, crime, an assault and it merits punishment. It is both cowardly and vile. She believes that a respectable person will never ask for an interview.

Question 5.
How do the other authors opine about the interview?
Answer:
Many authors do not favour the interview. H.G.Wells in an interview in 1894 referred to “the interviewing ordeal”. But he remained a frequent interviewee. Saul Bellow once agreed for an interview but he regarded it as being like thumb prints on his windpipe.

Question 6.
Umberto Eco says: “I am always doing the same thing but that is more difficult to explain.” Why does he say so?
Answer:
Umberto Eco feels elevated on calling him a professor. People think that he is doing many things but he concludes of doing himself the same thing. It is because that Umberto Eco had some philosophical interest which he followed in his novels and other academic work. His children books are based on peace and non-violence. There is a touch of philosophical and ethical interest as well.

Question 7.
What secret does Umberto Eco point out to Mukund Padmanabhan about an interview?
Answer:
Umberto Eco points out towards empty space in this universe. According to him if the empty space is eliminated from the universe, and as well as from the atoms, this universe will turn as big as our fist. In the same way, our lives are full of empty spaces. Umberto Eco calls them interstices. Eco says: “ Suppose you are coming over to my place on the third floor. You are in an elevator from the first to third floor and I am waiting for you. This is an interstice.”

Question 8.
How does Umberto Eco explain his capacity of doing so much work? What are ‘interstices’ and how does Eco use them?
Answer:
Umberto tells the secret pf his working style. People have a lot of empty spaces in their lives. He calls them ‘interstices’ or ‘intervals’. He utilises and makes use of them. This is the secret of his success. He tells his interviewer that while he was waiting for his elevator to come up, he has already written an article.

Question 9.
Describe the distinct style of ‘The Name of the Rose’.
Answer:
‘The Name of the Rose’ is the most popular and respected novel of Umberto Eco. It is a very serious novel. At one level, it appears to be a detective yarn. But it also delves into metaphysics, theology and medieval history. It is for those readers who don’t want easy experiences. But still it has a tremendous mass appeal.

Question 10.
Justify the title ‘The Interview’.
Answer:
The title of the excerpt is quite logical and apt. Umberto Eco likes to be interviewed. He cooperates fully with the interviewer, Mukund. He prefers himself to be called an academician than a novelist. He tells him that he started writing novel at the age of 50 just by accident. He wrote 40 non-fictional writings against 5 novels. He thinks himself a professor who writes novels on Sundays.

Question 11.
Why did Umberto Eco start writing novels at the age of 50, more or less?
Answer:
Umberto Eco was basically an academician. He was pursuing scholarly pursuits through academic writings. He wrote about forty non-fictional writings. He himself says that ‘he became a novelist by accident’. Perhaps that was the reason he started writing novels so late – at the age of 50, more or less.

Question 12.
“In spite of the ‘drawbacks’ the interview is a ‘supremely serviceable medium of communication’. Justify the statement.
Answer:
Many celebrities consider the interview ‘an unwarranted intrusion’ in their lives. But it has become a commonplace feature of journalism. It is a great serviceable medium of communication. We get the most vivid impressions of our contemporaries only through interviews. Everything reaches us in the simplest and true form when one asks questions of another.

Question 13.
How is Umberto Eco’s non-fictional writing a departure from his regular style?
Answer:
Umberto Eco’s non-fictional writing is a departure from his regular style. It has a ‘certain
playful and personal quality about it.’ His regular academic style is ‘depersonalised and boring’. Like other scholars Eco doesn’t make false hypotheses. On the contrary he tells the story of his research including his ‘trials and errors’.

Question 14.
‘The Name of the Rose’ is a very ‘serious novel’. Yet it enjoyed a mass audience. Give reasons for its popularity.
Answer:
Umberto Eco’s famous novel ‘The Name of the Rose’ is a very ‘serious novel’ But it enjoyed a mass audience. The interviewer wants to know the reason of its huge success. Even journalists and publishers are puzzled. People like what is served to them. If they are given to read even serious novels, they will read them. They accepted and digested a serious novel like ‘The Name of the Rose’. Its ‘timing’ was perfect. About 10 to 15 million copies of the novel were sold.

Question 15.
What is the position of the interviewer during the interview?
Answer:
According to Denis Brian, the interviewer holds a position of ‘unprecedented power and influence. He holds the balance between the audience and the man who is being interviewed. Almost everything of the celebrity reaches us through one man asking questions of another.

Question 16.
Do you think Umberto Eco likes being interviewed? Give a reasoned answer.
Answer:
Yes, Umberto Eco likes being interviewed. Throughout the interview, he remains cool and composed. He answers Makund’s questions and queries very patiently. He seems to be relaxed and tries to make Mukund quite comfortable. There is no trace of any impatience or irritation visible during the interview.

The Interview Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Explain the word Interview and how do many writers find favour with it.
Answer:
The word ‘interview’ is derived from French derivative word “entrevue”. It is a conversation between a journalist or broadcaster and a person of public interest. It is an oral examination of an applicant for a job through the process of formal questioning. Since the word has wider implications, it duly involves screening, interaction and introspection. During the process, both the interviewer and the interviewee, participate and the interviewee has to face the horror of the interviewer.

The word interview was inserted 130 years ago. Since then it became a commonplace in journalism. In this world, all have to undergo through the process of the interview. Thousand of people are interviewed daily for one or the other kind. Depending on the merit of the interview, people have claimed in its highest form as a source of truth and in its practice, it is an art. H.G. Wells remained averse to ‘interview’ and in 1894 he referred to it as an ordeal. But forty years later he himself was found interviewing Joseph Stalin of Russia. People view that almost everything reaches us through asking the interviewer who holds a position of unprecedent power and influence.

Question 2.
What does Umberto Eco point out about himself and his novel, “The Name of the Rose”?
Answer:
In an interview with Mukund, Umberto Eco points out that he regards himself a University Professor rather than a novelist. Uikewise, he readily went in academic conferences but did not go to meetings of Pen Clubs and the writers. He links himself with the academic community. He is a professor who writes novels on Sundays. Even people have the impression that Umberto Eco is doing many things.

Here Eco tells that his work includes philosophical interest and in his novels for children one can find non¬violence and peace. He says that the universe has empty spaces and these are eliminated in all the atoms. The universe will become as big as the fist of a man. He regards these empty spaces as interstices and he works in them.

For his writing, Umberto Eco adopts informal approach. He departs from a regular academic style and his essays follow a narrative aspect, which was the crowning success for his novel The Name of the Rose. It attracted a mass audience. His novels are full of narration. Side by side his novel has metaphysics, theology and medieval history as well. It has other experiences too.

Question 3.
How does Umberto Eco pursue his philosophical and academic interests? How does he make use of ‘interstices’? How has he developed a non-fictional style?
Answer:
Umberto Eco has many philosophical interests. He pursues them through his academic works and novels. Even his children’ works are about non-violence and peace. They are the same bunch of ethical and philosophical interests. Eco wrote more than 40 scholarly works on non-fiction. Eco considers himself ‘a university professor who writes novels (only) on Sundays’. He prefers to be called an academician.

Umberto shares a secret with the interviewer. He thinks that if we eliminate the empty spaces from the universe, the world will shrink. It will become as big as a fist. Similarly, we have a lot of empty spaces or ‘interstices’ in our lives. He works in these spaces and uses them to his advantage.

Umberto Eco has evolved a distinct non-fictional style. His scholarly works have a certain playful and personal quality about them. It is different from his regular style which is ‘depersonalised and often dry and boring’. He is different from other scholars. Eco tells the story of his research. Even he includes his ‘trials and errors’. His essays always have a narrative aspect. This narrative style of his scholarly works was fully developed later on in his novels.

Question 4.
Several thousand celebrities have been interviewed over the years, some of them repeatedly.’ But still many of them ‘despise the interview as an unwarranted intrusion in their lives’. Describe opinions for and against the interview as mentioned in the lesson.
Answer:
The interview has become an indispensable feature of journalism today. Several thousand celebrities have been interviewed over the years. Some of them have been interviewed repeatedly. Opinions vary. Some consider it a source of truth. Some call it a great art. It is the most effective and powerful medium of knowing important persons or celebrities.

Usually celebrities despise being interviewed. They consider it as an ‘unwarranted intrusion’ into their lives. They somehow feel that it diminishes them. Naipaul feels that people are ‘wounded by interviews’. They lose a part of themselves. Lewis Carrol never consented to be interviewed. Rudyard Kipling considered it immortal and an offence against his person. H.G. Wells interviewed Joseph Stalin.

But he also considered it as ‘an ordeal’. Saul Bellow considered interviews as ‘thumbprints on his windpipe’.In spite of some of these drawbacks, the interview remains ‘a supremely serviceable medium of communication’. Because of this, the interview holds a position of great power and influence.

Question 5.
What picture do you form of Umberto Eco after reading the extract of the interview of Eco that was taken by Mukund Padmanabhan?
Answer:
‘The Interview’ is an extract from an interview of Umberto Eco. The interviewer Padmanabhan helps us know many aspects of his writings, style and ideas. He emerges as a many-sided genius.Even the novelist David Lodge can’t understand how Umberto Eco can do all things he does. Eco answers it very modestly.

He only gives the impression of doing many things. Actually, he is doing the same thing. He pursues his philosophical interests through his academic writings and novels. Eco himself tells the secret of his success. He feels there a lot of‘empty spaces’ in our lives. He calls them ‘interstices’. He works in these empty spaces. He utilises them to his advantage.

Umberto Eco prefers himself to be called an academician rather than a novelist. He wrote more than 40 philosophical writings against just five novels. He started writing novels just by accident and that too at a late age of 50. Modesty and honesty are the signs of a great writer like Eco. Mukund Padmanabhan asks the reason behind the huge success of ‘The Name of the Rose’. Umberto honestly replies that the success of this novel is a mystery even to him. Perhaps, he wrote it at an appropriate time. Had it been written 10 years before or after, perhaps it wouldn’t have been such a huge success.

In this page you can find Poets and Pancakes Extra Questions and Answers Class 12 English Flamingo, Extra Questions for Class 12 English will make your practice complete.

Poets and Pancakes Extra Questions and Answers Class 12 English Flamingo

Poets and Pancakes Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Describe the make-up room of Gemini Studios.
Answer:
The make-up room of Gemini Studios looked more like a hair-cutting salon with incandescent lights at all angles and half a dozen large mirrors. The lights made the room so hot that those subjected to make-up had to put up with its ‘fiery misery’.

Question 2.
How was strict hierarchy maintained in the make-up room?
Answer:
Each make-up man was allotted his task according to his designation. The chief make¬up man put make-up on the chief actors and actresses, his senior assistant attended to the “second” hero and heroine, the junior assistant the main comedian. The actors who played the crowd were the responsibility of the office boy.

Question 3.
Why did the office boy go to the author? Why was the author praying for crowd s*hooting?
Answer:
The author worked in a cubicle, apparently with nothing to do. The office boy, frequently barged in to enlighten him on how Gemini Studios was allowing his great literary talent to go waste in a department fit for barbers and perverts. The author’s only hope of reprieve was to pray that make-up for crowd shooting would call him away.

Question 4.
What advantage did the office boy think Subbu had?
Answer:
The office boy believed that Subbu’s advantage was by virtue of being born a Brahmin. This would have given him greater exposure to a more affluent society, greater opportunities and better openings.

Question 5.
What were Subbu’s literary achievements?
Answer:
Subbu was an accomplished poet who addressed his poetry to the masses, in spite of being talented enough to write higher forms of poetry. His works included several ‘story poems’, and a full length novel, ‘Thilana Mohanambal’.

Question 6.
Who was Subbu’s enemy? Why?
Answer:
Subbu’s success and his undisputed position as No. 2 of Gemini Studios made the office boy his enemy. He firmly believed that Subbu was responsible for all his woes, humiliating neglect, and ignominy.

Question 7.
Subbu was charitable and generous. Why did he have enemies?
Answer:
Subbu’s closeness to the Boss and his desire to please him, made him appear to be a sychophant. His readiness to say nice things about everyone was misconstrued as cunning. So Subbu had enemies like the office boy who wished the direct things for him.

Question 8.
How did the legal advisor ruin an actress’ career?
Answer:
When an extremely talented but temperamental actress lost her temper and blew up the producer on the sets, the lawyer quietly recorded the outburst. He then played back the recording. Utterly shocked and dumbfounded, this actress was unable to deal with the shock and terror she experienced, and her career ended.

Question 9.
How did the lawyer lose his job?
Answer:
The lawyer lost his job when the story department of Gemini Studios was closed down. This was the first time in human history that a lawyer lost his job because the poets were asked to go home.

Question 10.
What did the khadi clad poets believe about Communism?
Answer:
Though none of them had any abiding political ideology, they worshipped Gandhiji and were averse to Communism. To them, a Communist was a man with no filial or conjugal love, could easily kill his parents and children, and was always out to spread unrest and violence.

Question 11.
What role does the MRA play in the narrative?
Answer:
Frank Buchman’s Moral Rearmament army was a kind of counter-movement to international Communism. They presented two plays in the Gemini Studios, with simple and homely messages, in an effort to counter the spread of communism in southern India.

Question 12.
Why was the English poet who visited Gemini Studios as baffled as his audience?
Answer:
The poet was baffled to address an audience that was utterly dazed and silent. No one understood his accent or the content of his speech. The audience was baffled as they had no idea why an English poet had been invited to a film studio that made Tamil films for the simplest sort of people.

Question 13.
Why did Stephen Spender visit Gemini Studios?
Answer:
Stephen Spender was a disillusioned communist. He had been invited to talk on his journey into Communism and his disillusioned return to the people of Gemini Studios who too were anti-communism.

Question 14.
Why does Asokamitran say that prose writing is not the true pursuit of a genius?
Answer:
Asokamitran feels that prose writing requires a lot of patience and perseverance.The prose writer’s mind should be so shrunken that no rejection can disappoint him. Nothing breaks his resolve to keep making fresh copies of his prose writings to send to one editor after, another.

Question 15.
The boss of Gemini Studios had nothing to do with Spender’s poetry but not with his ‘God that failed’. Explain.
Answer:
Years later, the mystery of Stephen Spender’s visit to Gemini Studios became clear to the author when he chanced upon the book,‘The God That Failed’, and read Spender’s essay. He realised that the Boss, S.S.Vasan, had deliberately brought the English poet to Gemini Studios to destroy all illusions about Communism among its simple inmates.

Question 16.
What does the author refer to as Pancake? Name the actresses who must have used it.
Answer:
Pancake was the brand name of a make-up material. Truckloads of this material were used by Gemini Studios. Greta Garbo, Miss Gohar and Vyajayantimala might have used it. But Rati Agnihotri might not have even heard of it.

Question 17.
Where was the make-up department of the Gemini Studios? Does the author think the building was what it was believed to be?
Answer:
The make-up department was located in the upstairs of a building that was believed to have been Robert Clive’s stables. But the author does not think it was actually so. There were many buildings in the city supposed to have been Clive’s residences.

Question 18.
In what sense was Subbu loyal to the boss?
Answer:
Subbu was totally loyal to the boss. He fully identified himself with him. He put all his creativity to the benefit of his boss. He felt inspired whenever commanded. He could suggest to the boss a number of ways to deal with a difficult scene or situation in a film.

Question 19.
In what way was Subbu better than the office boy?
Answer:
Subbu was No. 2 at Gemini Studios. However, in reality he was in no better position than the office boy. He had to face more difficulties. But Subbu had more affluent exposure and many abilities.

Question 20.
What was the poet’s preconceived idea about a Communist?
Answer:
The poet’s thought that a Communist was a godless person. He loved neither his children nor his wife. He was a terrorist, always prepared to cause violence and unrest among innocent and ignorant people.

Poets and Pancakes Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Describe the make-up department of the Gemini Studios. How did it prepare the players for a movie?
Answer:
The make-up department of the Gemini Studios was located in the upstairs of Robert Clive’s stables. They bought and lavishly used truckloads of a make-up material called Pancake. The make-up room contained large mirrors and bright lights set at various angles. It looked like a hair-cutting salon. It was a terrible experience for an actor or actress to undergo the make-up.

The lights generated intense heat. The members of the make-up department represented different parts of India. It symbolised national integration. Ninety-five per cent of the shooting of a film during those days was done on the sets. It demanded that every pore of the actors’ faces should be closed. Thus, they were painted, and looked ugly. A strict hierarchy was maintained. The chief make-up man made the hero and the heroine ugly. The office boy painted the crowd players ugly.

Question 2.
What was Moral Rearmament Army? Describe their visit to the Gemini Studios.
Answer:
Frank Buchman’s Moral Rearmament Army visited the Gemini Studios in 1952. It was a drama company. In reality, it was a counter movement to international communism. It had two-hundred players and was called an international circus. The players belonged to twenty different nationalities.

They presented two plays in the most professional manner. The plays represented simple homilies and the costumes and sets were superb. Their play, ‘Jotham Valley” impressed the Tamil theatre. They imitated the sunrise and sunset scenes in their manner for years. The scenes were played on a bare stage with a white background and a tune played on the flute.Though the MRA was anti-communist and the anti-communist feeling existed at the Studios, the coming of the MRA had no impact on the attitude of the bosses; their enterprises went on as usual.

In this page you can The Book that Saved the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet, Extra Questions for Class 10 English will make your practice complete.

The Book that Saved the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet

The Book that Saved the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
What does Noodle tell Think-Tank about the books?
Answer:
Noodle tells Think-Tank that books are like sandwiches. They are means of communication. These sandwiches are not for ear communication but for eye communication. The Earthlings do not listen to the sandwiches. They open them and watch them. Noodle reads out the nursery rhymes to Think- Tank from Mother Goose.

Question 2.
How did one old book of nursery rhymes save the world from a Martian invasion?
Answer:
The Martians under the leadership of Think-Tank decided to invade the Earth. They found an old book of nursery rhymes Mother Goose. Think-Tank interpreted the rhymes in his own way. He got frightened. He concluded that the people on the Earth were more powerful and advanced than he was. He called his crew members back. Hence, the old book of nursery rhymes saved the world from a Martian invasion.

Question 3.
What is Think-Tank’s opinion about the Earth?
Answer:
Think-Tank was the mighty captain of Mars Space Control. He did not have good opinion about the Earth and its people. He considered the Earth a ridiculous little planet. He thought that it was an insignificant place where ugly earthlings, with their tiny heads dwell.

Question 4.
How did Think-Tank interpret the rhymes of the book ‘Mother Goose’?
Answer:
Think-Tank was an arrogant fool ruling the planet Mars. After taking the vitamins they were able to read the rhymes in the book Mother Goose. He interpreted the rhymes in his own way. He concluded that the people on the Earth were more powerful and more advanced than he was.

Question 5.
How did the people on the Earth help the Martian people?
Answer:
After the departure of Think-Tank from the Mars, Noodle was elected as the ruler of the Mars. He was an intelligent and wonderful person. The earthlings resumed contact with the Martians. They became friends and taught the Martians how to read. The people on both the planets exchanged their views and values. They established a model library in the capital city of Marsopolis.

Question 6.
How does Think-Tank compare the Martians with the people on the Earth? What does he call the Earth mockingly?
Answer:
Think-Tank compares the Martians with the people on the Earth. He calls Martians more handsome race than that of the people on the Earth. He calls the Earth ‘a ridiculous little planet’ and ‘a primitive ball of mud’.

Question 7.
What ‘high levels of civilisation’ have earthlings reached, according to Think-Tank?
Answer:
According to Think-Tank, the people of the Earth have made advancement in all the fields of life. They have reached the ‘high levels of civilisation’. They have taught their domesticated animals musical culture and space techniques.

Question 8.
What was Oop’s opinion about the ‘sandwiches’ he had eaten?
Answer:
Oop found a book in the library. He thought it to be a sandwich. He was ordered to eat it. He found it absolutely tasteless and useless. He could not understand how such things could be eaten by the earthlings without water. They were as dry as Martian dust.

Question 9.
What did Noodle suggest about the book?
Answer:
Noodle was an intelligent person but he did not want to offend Think-Tank. He suggested that the book was not a sandwich, it was some device used for communication. Later on, he suggested that the team should eat vitamins to increase their intelligence so that they would read them.

Question 10.
Which book saved the Earth from Martian invasion and how?
Answer:
Mother Goose, a nursery rhymes book, saved the Earth from the Martian invasion. Think-Tank interpreted the rhymes in his own way. He got frightened and decided to vacate the planet.

Question 11.
Who was Think-Tank? What did he want?
Answer:
Think-Tank was an arrogant ruler of the Martian Planet. He wanted to expand his kingdom and rule over the Earth. So he decided to invade the Earth. He was top confident of his abilities.

Question 12.
Who was Noodle? What type of a person was he?
Answer:
Noodle was an apprentice in the kindgom of Think-Tank. He was an intelligent attendant of Think- Tank. He was a person who knew how to communicate his idea without offending the king. It was he who described the so-called sandwich as a means of communication.

Question 13.
How did Noodle address Think-Tank?
Answer:
Think-Tank is the ruler of Mars. Noodle addressed him, ‘O Great and Mighty Think-Tank, Ruler of Mars and her two moons, most powerful and intelligent creature in the whole universe.’

Question 14.
Why did Think-Tank send his crew on the Earth?
Answer:
Think-Tank intended to invade the Earth. He wanted to control the Earth and put it under his rulership. He was an arrogant ruler who was hungry for power. So he sent his crew on the Earth.

Question 15.
Where was the crew on the Earth? What did they find there?
Answer:
The crew led by captain Omega landed on the Earth with his team. They found themselves in the Centerville Public Library amidst thousands of books. They thought the books to be sandwiches.

Question 16.
Who was Omega? Why did he try to eat the book?
Answer:
Omega was the captain of the crew which was sent by Think-Tank to invade the Earth. He tried to eat the book because he was ordered by Think-Tank to do so. They all thought the book to be a sandwich.

Question 17.
What was the book about? How did Think-Tank interpret its content?
Answer:
The book was a popular book of nursery rhymes, Mother Goose. Think-Tank interpreted the rhymes in his own unique way. He concluded that the people on the Earth were more advanced and powerful. He decided to call his crew back. He was so frightened that he vacated the planet Mars too.

Question 18.
Why did Think-Tank decide to call the crew back?
Answer:
When Think-Tank listened the nursery rhymes read out by Noodle, he concluded that the people on the Earth were more powerful and advanced. He called his crew back and gave up the idea of invading the planet.

Question 19.
Why did Think-Tank decide to evacuate the Martian Planet?
Answer:
Think-Tank was so frightened after the wrong interpretation of the rhymes book that he not only called the crew back but decided to leave the Martian planet too. He concluded that the people on the Earth were more powerful and advanced. He thought that they might attack his planet and kill him. So, he decided to leave the Martian planet forever and shift to some far away galaxy.

The Book that Saved the Earth Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Compare the contrast the characters of Think-Tank and Noodle.
Answer:
Think-Tank and Noodles are the two main characters in the play. Think-Tank is an arrogant fool ruling the planet. He is very strict and cannot hear anything against himself. He thinks that he is the most intelligent and powerful person in the universe. He is an arrogant and stupid person. He has little knowledge about the things.Noodle, on the other hand, is an intelligent and sensible character. He knows how to tackle Think- Tank intelligently. He corrects him tactfully without offending him. Noodle is better than arrogant Think-Tank.

Question 2.
Noodle avoids offending Think-Tank but at the same time he corrects his mistakes. How does he manage to do that?
Answer:
This is a fiction which is anticipated. Time has gone five centuries ahead and the twentieth century’s period is being taken as history. The place is Mars and the Martians are speaking about the life on the Earth. In this very funny and interesting play, the character of captain Think-Tank has been depicted as a dictator or almighty who thinks himself to be on the top. He never spares his subordinates and mentions their mistakes immediately.

Every time Noodle avoids offending Think-Tank, he corrects his mistakes also. There are many instances to highlight the same. When the team of Martians on the Earth is oblivious about the object ‘Books’, captain Think-Tank claims that the books are sandwiches. At this Noodle corrects Think’ Tank with utter humility by mentioning that they were not sandwiches but a means of communication. Later also, he mentions the fact that the Martians on the Earth will attain extra intelligence if they eat the vitamins provided by the chemical department but Noodle modestly corrects him and gives him the right information.

At one place when Think-Tank declares that he is never wrong and tells them to eat the sandwiches, with all humility and humbleness, Noodle tells him that sandwiches are some sort of communication device. Thus, with subtle modesty and utter humility, Noodle corrects captain Think-Tank, though he avoided his best to do the same.

Question 3.
If you were in Noodle’s place, how would you have handled Think-Tank’s mistakes?
Answer:
Think-Tank was a proud and mighty captain. He enjoyed to be honoured by other captains and does not like his mistakes to be corrected. Noodle also avoids correcting his mistakes but he does his work very nicely and gracefully. If I were in Noodle’s place, I would also have handled the situation in the same way he did.

It is said that humility can move mountains. By being most humble, modest and with full respect, I would correct captain Think-Tank’s mistakes so that he should not get annoyed or irritated as he becomes in the beginning when Noodle misses some part of his salutation but pacifies him with his modest manner.

Question 4.
Do you think books are being replaced by the electronic media? Can we do away with books altogether?
Answer:
This is an era of machines. Machines have occupied almost all the fields of life. Yes, books are also being replaced by electronic media to some extent. Mobile phones, computers and TVs are slowly eating away books. Not only children but even adults prefer electronic media. With the world developing at such a rapid rate, the use of electronic media has become indispensable and the young generation finds more fantasy in playing games than reading books.

Also the concept of electronic books (Books on Computer) makes matter easier for adults and professionals. Books cannot be done away with. Our rich cultural heritage lies in these books that can be preserved for generations ‘ to come. Books are a treasure of history and one can learn a lot by inculcating the habit of reading. Thus, books can never be done away with totally, though electronic media has replaced the traditional books to some extent.

Question 5.
Why are books referred to as man’s best companion? Which is your favourite book and why? Write a paragraph about that book.
Answer:
It is said that books are the treasure of knowledge and information. The experiences of great scholars are transferred to us through books. Reading is not only a pleasant hobby but an excellent diversion. Our leisure is utilised and we don’t fall into bad company or habit. Books provide us with intellectual feast of knowledge and improve quality of our mind. Thus, books are the best companion of man. I have read many books and I have liked them too.

But my favourite book is ‘Angels and Demons’. It is written by Dan Brown and was the first in the series of four bestsellers, including ‘The Da Vinci Code’. The plot is based on an anti-matter bomb ticking in the core of Vatican City amidst the elections for the Pope. It is a perfect blend of history and modern science. The research involved with the book is stupendous. The scene where the Camerlango stands upon the roof of the church is etched in my memory forever. It is a must-read masterpiece and I enjoyed it thoroughly.

Question 6.
In what ways does Think-Tank misinterpret innocent nursery rhymes as threats to the Martians? Can you think of any incidents where you misinterpreted a word or an action? How did you resolve the misunderstanding?
Answer:
Think-Tank misinterprets innocent nursery rhymes as threats to the Martians. He interprets the rhymes in a complete verbal manner without understanding their contextual meanings. The rhyme mistress Mary makes him ponder over the discovery of the Earth. He understood that silver crops and high explosives could be grown on the Earth. When he listens to the rhyme “Hey diddle, diddle” The is alarmed and is surprised to find that the earthlings are more civilised.

He concluded that they had mastered space technique and were planning interplanetary attack. He screamed when heheard “Humpty Dumpty had a great fall” He interprets, “Had a great fall to the fall of Mars.”He was so scared that he changed his plan to capture the Earth planet. [The remaining part of the answer may differ from student to student as it is based on personal experience.]

In this page you can find A Question of Trust Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet, Extra Questions for Class 10 English will make your practice complete.

A Question of Trust Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet

A Question of Trust Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
How were flowers hindering Horace in his work?
Answer:
Horace suffered from hay fever and was allergic to some flowers. On smelling the flowers, he started sneezing and was caught red-handed by another thief.

Question 2.
Why was it not difficult for Horace to open the safe?
Answer:
It was not difficult for Horace to open the safe because he was a perfect and experienced locksmith. He had collected all the information about the safe before entering the house.

Question 3.
What advice did the lady give Horace regarding his hay fever? Was she really interested in his health?
Answer:
The lady advised Horace that he could find a cure to the hay fever by trying to find which plant gave the disease. She was not interested in his disease or its cure, but she was rather making fun of him.

Question 4.
Why did Horace Danby feel sure of his success in that year’s robbery?
Answer:
Horace Danby felt sure of his success in that year’s robbery too, because he had planned his work carefully. He studied every detail of the house. He had chosen an appropriate place and time for the robbery.

Question 5.
How did Horace manage the small dog when he attempted to rob the house at Shotover Grange?
Answer:
Horace Danby was an expert thief who planned his mission without any fault. When he tried to rob the house in Grange, he encountered a dog. But Horace Danby calmed the dog by calling him by his name.

Question 6.
What story did the lady tell Horace to get the jewels?
Answer:
The lady told Horace an interesting story. She told that her jewels were lying in the safe which she, needed at once. She also told that she had forgotten the numbers to open the safe.

Question 7.
Did Horace get the jewels from the Grange safe? If not, why did the police arrest him?
Answer:
Horace was not able to get any jewels though he stole them. The young lady in red befooled him. But the police arrested him due to his fingerprints on the Grange safe.

Question 8.
How can you say that Horace Danby was good and respectable but not completely honest?
Answer:
Horace Danby was not a typical thief. He used to rob every year enough money to last for twelve months to buy books which he loved to read. He is described as a good and respectable person but not completely honest because he could not curb his habit of stealing a safe every year.

Question 9.
Why did Horace rob every year? Was he a typical thief? If so, why? In what way could Horace’s arrest have helped the lady?
Answer:
He robbed every year enough money to last for twelve months to buy books which he loved to read. No, he was not a typical thief because he used to steal only to buy interesting books.

Question 10.
Did the young lady expect Horace to be caught after the theft?
Answer:
Yes, the young lady knew that Horace would be caught. As he forgot to put on his gloves. Naturally his finger prints would lead the police towards him. Horace’s arrest would not let anyone think that she was the thief. So she was to be benefitted by his arrest.

Question 11.
Was Horace a typical thief? Why/Why not?
Answer:
No, Horace was not a typical thief. He robbed only once in a year to have enough money to last for twelve months. He was fond of expensive books which he used to buy from the stolen money. Otherwise, he was considered as an honest and respectable person.

Question 12.
What do you think is the meaning of the phrase ‘honour among thieves’? Who lacked it?
Answer:
The phrase ‘honour among thieves’ means that even the thieves have some principles and they do not cheat each other. They trust other thieves and are honest in their dealings with each other. Obviously, it is the young lady in the Red, who lacked honour as she cheated and befooled another thief. She procured the booty whereas Horace went to the jail.

Question 13.
How did Horace get entry into the house?
Answer:
He was very keen in his observation. He was able to see that the housekeepef hung the keys to the kitchen door on a hook. He picked up the keys from there and opened the door.

Question 14.
How did Horace know about the safe behind the painting?
Answer:
A magazine article had described this house giving a plan of all the rooms and a picture of this room. Even the fact that the safe was hidden behind a picture was given there.

A Question of Trust Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Horace was a thief who planned his work carefully. He was in a way a successful thief. Should we call him a successful thief and appreciate his work? Why/Why not?
Answer:
Horace Danby was a good, honest citizen of about 50 years. He planned his work carefully. He was a meticulous planner. He used to observe and supervise the house to be burgled. He never acted in haste. He studied the map and other minute details of the house at Shotover Grange.

He had the details of electric wiring, dogs and servants of the house. He knew when it was the right time to strike. He did his work so well that there was no cause of his arrest. No doubt he was a successful thief but his act of theft can not be appreciated. Stealing is a vice which can not be appreciated. To fulfil our needs we should not resort to theft.

Question 2.
Do you think Horace Danby was unfairly punished or that he deserved what he got? Do you agree that honesty in wrong acts is not desirable?
Answer:
The story, A Question of Trust’ is a story of distrust. The lady in the red is the real culprit. She was a very clever lady and was successful in befooling Horace. She made him believe that she was the mistress of the house and told him a story with conviction. Horace had taken off his gloves, because he thought that the wife of the owner was with him. That was the biggest mistake of his life.

Horace Danby left his fingerprints and was arrested. He was not punished unfairly. He was not innocent as he entered the house with the intention to rob the house. Honesty in wrong acts can not be justified. It is not desirable at all.

Question 3.
Do intentions justify actions? Would you, like Horace Danby, do something wrong if you thought your ends justify the means? Do you think that there are situations in which it is excusable to act less than honest?
Answer:
Yes, intentions justify the actions. If any wrong act is committed unintentionally, it can be excused. But if the wrong act is done intentionally it is not excusable. Horace Danby had the intention to rob the house. This is an intentional crime. He helped the house lady by opening the safe, he had good intentions but that too, for his own motive of being free. I would not indulge in any wrong act even if it is justified. Mere justifcation of the wrong act does not serve the purpose. Yes, there are situations in which it is excusable to act less than honest. But the case of Horace Danby does not fall in that category.

Question 4.
Did you begin to suspect, before the end of the story, that the lady was not the person Horace Danby took her to be? If so, at what point did you realise this, and how? How will you appreciate the act of the lady?
Answer:
Yes, it is very natural to suspect that the lady was not the owner of the house as she did not express surprise on seeing a burglar in her house rather she promised him that she would not hand him over to the police. Secondly, she even did not know the number of the safe. But Horace was too nervous to notice all these things.

The lady in red was very clever. She was successful in befooling Horace Danby. She was a good actress and acted so smartly that Horace Danby was trapped in her scheme. She lacked honour. Her act cannot be appreciated as she trapped another person for her greed and bad intentions.

Question 5.
What are the subtle ways in which the lady manages to deceive Horace Danby into thinking she is the lady of the house? Why doesn’t Horace suspect that something is wrong? What are the negative aspects of her character?
Answer:
The lady is very smart and clever. She succeeds in befooling Horace Danby that she is the owner of the house. She is a well dressed, well planned and organised thief who drafted her trick so meticulously that a brilliant thief like Horace could not suspect her. The way she enters and talks to Horace Danby, he is unable to doubt her integrity. Even the dog did not bark on seeing her. The lady in red had some negative traits in her personality. She was not honest. She was a thief and befooled another thief. She lacked honesty, integrity and honour.

Question 6.
“Horace Danby was good and respectable – but not completely honest.” Why do you think this description is apt for Horace? Why can’t he be categorised as a typical thief? Should we call him a good human being?
Answer:
The statement is an apt statement for Danby. He was a respectable person, but he was a thief who in order to fulfil his desire used to rob once in a year. He had adopted a dishonest way to fulfil his desire. So he cannot be called an honest person.

Horace Danby is not a typical thief because he steals mainly to buy rare and expensive books. He planned his theft in such a manner that he could not be arrested so far. Being an introvert, he did not blurt about his theft to anybody. No, we can’t call him a good human being. He was a victim of the trick played on him. He is not completely honest. He entered the house with bad intention. He was a thief and a thief can not be called a good human being.

Question 7.
“Horace Danby was a meticulous planner but still he faltered.” Where did he go wrong and why? Negative values never pay in long run: Do you agree?
Answer:
Though Horace Danby was a brilliant thief, he was caught in the end. He faltered because he readily handed over jewellery to the so-called owner of the house. Horace Danby was befooled by the lady in red. She pretended to be the owner of the house and made him open the safe without gloves. Horace left his fingerprints. He failed in his plan and was caught for a crime that he did not commit.

Negative values never pay in the long run. Every criminal has his punishment. Sooner or later one is caught and punished. Horace Danby was no doubt a meticulous planner but he was on a wrong path. His intention had never been good. He planned to rob others and was ultimately paid for it.

Question 8.
The lady in red dress was a more professional thief than Horace Danby. Do you agree? Elaborate.
Answer:
The lady in red not only outsmarted Horace Danby rather she went one step forward to ensure that all the evidence went against Horace to establish him as the real culprit and the lady walked out freely and untraceably. The lady combined her female arrogance and confidence to prepare a perfect recipe to befool Horace as he could not suspect that she was not the real lady of house. The lady tricked Horace Danby to utilise his years of experience in theft for her own benefit and Horace on the basis of his fingerprints was put behind the bars.

Question 9.
How did Horace Danby plan his robbery of shot over Grange?
Answer:
Horace Danby was not a typical thief. He planned his act of burglary meticulously. He always studied his target carefully. He planned his robbery of Shotover Grange carefully. He studied the situation . of rooms, electric fittings and other aspects well in advance. He collected details from different magazines and articles. He was aware about the safe which had jewels worth fifteen thousand pounds.

He knew the family was on vacation in London. He also knew that all the servants had gone for a movie. He knew the place of the keys too. When the right time came he struck his plan but outwitted by the lady in red. His plan failed and he was arrested.

In this page you can find For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight, Extra Questions for Class 10 English will make your practice complete.

For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight

For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
What does the young man mean by “great honey-coloured / Ramparts at your ear?” Why does he say that young men are “thrown into despair” by them? ”
Answer:
The “great honey-colored / Ramparts at your ear” refers’to the beautiful yellow coloured hair that falls at the woman’s ear and cover it like a wall around a fort. He says that the young men are “thrown into despair” by them because they look so beautiful on the women that her beauty gets thoroughly enhanced. The young men fall in love with her and feel despair. He says that it is not possible that someone would love her alone and not her yellow hair.

Question 2.
What colour is the young woman’s hair? What does she say she can change it to? Why would she want to do so?
Answer:
The young woman’s hair is of yellow colour. She says that she could get her hair dyed to brown, black or carrot colour. She would change the colour of her hair so that the young men in despair would love her only and not her yellow hair. She wanted them to love her for what she was and not for her appearance such as her hair colour.

Question 3.
Why is the youth in despair in the poem “For Anne Gregory”?
Answer:
The young man loves Anne. He is attracted towards her external beauty. He feels that young men are in despair because of her exquisite beauty.

Question 4.
What did the religious man tell the poet?
Answer:
The religious man told the poet that he found a book to prove that only god could love her for her spiritual beauty and not for her physical beauty.

For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
The poet in the poem, ‘For Anne Gregory’ conveys that we should give importance to the inner beauty and not to the physical appearance. Elaborate with reference to the poem.
Answer:
The lady has attractive yellow hair, but shuns any suitor who falls for her hair rather than herself. The lady asserts that she can dye her hair into shades of brown, black, or carrot to ward off desperate men and assert that a genuine lover should love her for herself and not for her hair. The poet declares that human love is fickle and drawn to exterior appearances. The poet declares that loving a person for his true character rather than the external accouterments, is a godly quality. God loves a human being for their true selves and not for their yellow hair, proving that a gay coat does not make a person a gentleman.

Question 2.
Write a paragraph on the topic “All that Glitters is not Gold”. With reference to the poem “For Anne Gregory” written by W. B. Yeats.
Answer:
What we see through the naked eye might not always be the naked truth. Like shining pieces of glass that shine and glitter like diamonds, the way people appear on the outside can be very misleading. We must never judge a book by its cover as there is a possibility that we might be wrong.

Appearances should never be trusted. It can lead us to wrong conclusions. A person may be very handsome or beautiful outside but inside if the character is not good that person’s appearance is of no value. So always try to look beneath the skin because beauty is skin deep. The real beauty lies in the personality of the person, not in external appearances.

For Anne Gregory Extra Questions and Answers Reference-to-Context

Read the stanza given below and answer the questions that follow:

Question 1.
But I can get a hair-dye
And set such colour there,
Brown, or black, or carrot,
That young men in despair
May love me for myself alone
And not my yellow hair.

(a) Anne Gregory wants to argue on the point that a young man will love her alone.
Answer:
for herself

(b) Anne wants to change the …………. of her hair to make her lover love her and not her hair.
Answer:
colour

(c) Anne would give her hair orange, yellow or carrot colour. (True/False)
Answer:
False

(d) Find the antonym of ‘hope’ in the extract.
Answer:
despair.

Question 2.
“I heard an old religious man
But yesternight declare
That he had found a text to prove
That only God, my dear,
Could love you for yourself alone
And not your yellow hair.”

(a) The old religious man wants to give the from a religious text.
Answer:
evidence

(b) The yellow hair refers to the colour of the hair and the
Answer:
age

(c) Only God can love us for ourselves. (True/False)
Answer:
True

(d) Find the same meaning of ‘saintly’ in the extract.
Answer:
religious.

Chapter-wise CBSE Class 10 Science Important Questions PDF Download

Access all chapter-wise NCERT important questions for CBSE Class 10 Science by clicking on the particular chapter link available over here.

1. Chemical Reactions and Equations Class 10 Important Questions
2. Acids Bases and Salts Class 10 Important Questions
3. Metals and Non-metals Class 10 Important Questions
4. Carbon and its Compounds Class 10 Important Questions
5. Periodic Classification of Elements Class 10 Important Questions
6. Life Processes Class 10 Important Questions
7. Control and Coordination Class 10 Important Questions
8. How do Organisms Reproduce Class 10 Important Questions
9. Heredity and Evolution Class 10 Important Questions
10. Light Reflection and Refraction Class 10 Important Questions
11. Human Eye and Colourful World Class 10 Important Questions
12. Electricity Class 10 Important Questions
13. Magnetic Effects of Electric Current Class 10 Important Questions
14. Sources of Energy Class 10 Important Questions
15. Our Environment Class 10 Important Questions
16. Management of Natural Resources Class 10 Important Questions

In this page you can find Fog Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight, Extra Questions for Class 10 English will make your practice complete.

Fog Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English First Flight

Fog Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
How does the fog spread over the harbour and the city?
Answer:
The fog-comes to a city stealthily just like a cat. It makes no noise. It spreads over the harbour and the city and settles over them for sometimes. There, it rises high and moves away. In this way the fog arrives over a city, observes it and then leaves it to move away.

Question 2.
Difficulties come but they are not to stay forever. They come and go. Comment referring to the poem “Fog’.
Answer:
None can deny that fact that after every nightfall, there is sunshine. In other words sorrows follow happiness. Life has many ups and downs. We must all accept that problems as a part of life. We should strengthen ourselves so much that we are able to face them and stand up to solve these problems. We should not get carried away. We should learn that time and tide wait for none.

Fog is also symbolic of darkness but it comes quietly like a cat and goes away. It symbolises that if we are not disturbed by difficulties then life will itself move to lighter side and things will be easy to confront. We should always remember that, we must face all the problems boldly.

Question 3.
How is the fog like a cat?
Answer:
The poet finds the fog like a cat. The fog comes stealthily like a cat. It sits looking over the harbour and city as a cat does. Later, it moves on just like a cat to settle somewhere else. These things prove that the fog’s comparison to a cat is appropriate.

Fog Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
‘Nothing lasts forever’. How far does the poem ‘Fog’ depict this idiom?
Answer:
The fog in the poem makes a silent, but all-pervasive entry on the scene. It gives no indication of its temporary nature, at this stage. Its silent arrival, as if on cat feet, does not indicate its onward spread. It seems to be surrounding the entire countryside like a child sitting on its haunches, indicating a mysterious aura without exposing its next move.

The reader anticipates some dramatic outcome of this all-pervasive presence from the harbour, right down to the city. In the final outcome, the fog makes a silent exit, as secretively as its arrival. The entire drama seems to suggest that even in the most engulfing of circumstances, is but temporary in nature.

Question 2.
Write the central idea of the poem “Fog”.
Answer:
The poet Carl Sandburg in his poem ‘Fog’ describes fog as a cat. Fog is treated to be a living creature. Fog comes quietly and stealthily like a cat. Fog sits looking over the harbour like a cat does. Then it moves to settle somewhere else. Just as cat doesn’t settle at one place and in the same way fog keeps on moving and finally vanishes.

Question 3.
The poet is able to visualize the image of a cat in the fog. Similarly there is an inseparable connection between native and all creations in it. Based on the reading of the poem, write a paragraph on the topic—“God lives in His creations in native”.
Answer:
God is omnipresent and nature is a gift of God to us. Nature has both, the power to sanctify and power to destroy. He makes his presence which provides us with the vital oxygen, the food that grows beneath and above the ground, the water that satisfies out thirst etc. He has made everything and everyone with a purpose and he lives in all of them. Nature cannot exist on its own. It is because God’s reflection falls on each of his creation that we, mere mortals survive and thrive on this planet. Thus, we must always respect, love, and care for all of God’s creations.

Fog Extra Questions and Answers Reference-to-Context

Read the stanza given below and answer the questions that follow:

Question 1.
The fog comes on little cat feet.

(a) The poet thinks that the fog is like a
Answer:
cat

(b) ‘Cat’s feet’ refers to the softness of
Answer:
movement

(c) Fog is a symbol of
Answer:
sorrow.

(d) Give the meaning of the phrase ‘on little cat feet’ from the extract.
Answer:
silently/quickly

Question 2.
It sits looking
over harbour and city
on silent haunches
and then moves on.

(a) The fog spreads over the and city on silent haunches like a cat.
Answer:
harbour

(b) The fog ………. after some time just as a cat does.
Answer:
disappears

(c) The poetic device in the extract is personification.
Answer:
True

(d) Find the same meaning of ‘port’ in the extract.
Answer:
harbour

In this page you can find NCERT Extra Questions for Class 10 English First Flight, Footprints Without Feet, Literature Reader. Students can get Class 10 English NCERT Solutions, Chapter Wise CBSE Class 10 English Important Questions and Answers will make your practice complete.

Extra Questions for Class 10 English Beehive, Moments, Literature Reader Important Questions

Extra Questions for Class 10 English First Flight Prose

1. A Letter to God Extra Questions
2. Nelson Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom Extra Questions
3. Two Stories about Flying Extra Questions
4. From the Diary of Anne Frank Extra Questions
5. The Hundred Dresses Part 1 Extra Questions
6. The Hundred Dresses Part 2 Extra Questions
7. Glimpses of India Extra Questions
8. Mijbil the Otter Extra Questions
9. Madam Rides the Bus Extra Questions
10. The Sermon at Benares Extra Questions
11. The Proposal Extra Questions

Extra Questions for Class 10 English First Flight Poem

1. Dust of Snow Extra Questions
2. Fire and Ice Extra Questions
3. A Tiger in the Zoo Extra Questions
4. How to Tell Wild Animals Extra Questions
5. The Ball Poem Extra Questions
6. Amanda Extra Questions
7. Animals Extra Questions
8. The Trees Extra Questions
9. Fog Extra Questions
10. The Tale of Custard the Dragon Extra Questions
11. For Anne Gregory Extra Questions

Extra Questions for Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet

1. A Triumph of Surgery Extra Questions
2. The Thief’s Story Extra Questions
3. The Midnight Visitor Extra Questions
4. A Question of Trust Extra Questions
5. Footprints without Feet Extra Questions
6. The Making of a Scientist Extra Questions
7. The Necklace Extra Questions
8. The Hack Driver Extra Questions
9. Bholi Extra Questions
10. The Book that Saved the Earth Extra Questions

Extra Questions for Class 10 English Literature Reader

1. Two Gentlemen of Verona Extra Questions
2. Mrs. Packletide’s Tiger Extra Questions
3. The Letter Extra Questions
4. A Shady Plot Extra Questions
5. Patol Babu, Film Star Extra Questions
6. Virtually True Extra Questions
7. The Frog and the Nightingale Extra Questions
8. Mirror Extra Questions
9. Not Marble, Nor the Gilded Monuments Extra Questions
10. Ozymandias Extra Questions
11. The Rime of the Ancient Mariner Extra Questions
12. Snake Extra Questions
13. The Dear Departed Extra Questions
14. Julius Caesar Extra Questions
15. From the Diary of Anne Frank Extra Questions
16. The Story of My Life Extra Questions

If you have any queries related to NCERT Extra Questions for Class 10 English First Flight, Footprints Without Feet, Literature Reader, you can reach out to us in the comment section below, we will get back to you in no time.