How Many Muscles Are In The Human Body?

Total 35%-40% of weight in our body is because of muscles. Muscles mainly are important in the movement of the body. Nearly 700 muscles are present in our body, which are divided amongst three main categories:-

  • Visceral muscle is the weakest muscle also known as involuntary muscle that is controlled by the unconscious part of mind. Its main function is to make muscles contract in order to make easier substances to move through the organs.
  • Cardiac muscle is the muscle which is found only in the heart. Cardiac muscle cannot be controlled by our mind hence it is also referred to as involuntary. Its main function is to help pumping of heart in order to pump blood throughout the body.
  • Skeletal muscle is the only muscle that our mind can control. It is directly related to our body’s physical movement.
  • It simply controls whatever we do like walking, talking, moving etc. i.e. every physical action that we do consciously is due to skeletal muscle.

The Bet Short Story Summary

The Bet Short Story Summary

“The Bet” proves that if a person achieved the highest wisdom he wouldn’t care about money or material things at all. He would be like Buddha or Jesus, both of whom owned nothing and wanted nothing. This moral seems to be enhanced by the fact that the banker, whose whole life is devoted to handling money and accumulating wealth, is not happy or enviable but has deteriorated morally over the years.

When it comes time for him to pay the two million roubles, he is so attached to his dwindling capital that he is actually contemplating murdering the prisoner to get out of paying him for enduring fifteen years of solitary confinement. The story is told from the banker’s point of view, so he may not realize how low he has sunk in that period of time, even though he was rich and had complete freedom.

Desperate gambling on the Stock Exchange, wild speculation and the excitability which he could not get over even in advancing years, had by degrees led to the decline of his fortune and the proud, fearless, self-confident millionaire had become a banker of middling rank, trembling at every rise and fall in his investments. “Cursed bet!” muttered the old man, clutching his head in despair. “Why didn’t the man die? He is only forty now. He will take my last penny from me, he will marry, will enjoy life, will gamble on the Exchange; while I shall look at him with envy like a beggar, and hear from him every day the same sentence: ‘I am indebted to you for the happiness of my life, let me help you!’ No, it is too much! The one means of being saved from bankruptcy and disgrace is the death of that man!”

Not only is the banker seriously thinking of killing his prisoner, but he is actually considering having the watchman implicated in the crime and possibly executed for it or sent to Siberia.

“If I had the pluck to carry out my intention,” thought the old man, “suspicion would fall first upon the watchman.”

Fortunately for the banker, he finds a note describing what his prisoner has learned in studying books in solitary confinement, as well as what conclusions he has arrived at through his own meditations. Part of the note contains this indictment:

“You have lost your reason and taken the wrong path. You have taken lies for truth, and hideousness for beauty.”

The most important part of the note, as far as the banker is concerned, comes at the end:

“To prove to you in action how I despise all that you live by, I renounce the two million of which I once dreamed as of paradise and which I now despise. To deprive myself of the right to the money I shall go out from here five hours before the time fixed, and so break the compact …”

A complementary moral to the principal moral regarding the vanity of materialism is that life imprisonment is a more humane form of punishment than the death sentence. It was the young lawyer who argued in favor of life imprisonment fifteen years earlier and the banker who said:

“I don’t agree with you. . . . I have not tried either the death penalry or imprisonment for life, but if one may judge a priori, the death penalty is more moral and more humane than imprisonment for life.”

The lawyer has not only proved that he could endure fifteen years of solitary confinement, but he has proved that life imprisonment is indeed more humane because it permits study and meditation, thereby enabling at least some criminals to develop completely new characters.

Product Line Examples

Product Line Examples

Please tell me the example of product line, product mix, product extension and product filling of the particular company.
In any given company, a product line refers to a variety of different products that are related and grouped together by the same company. Product lines are used as a means to enlarge the consumer base by appealing to consumer demand through the introduction of a diverse range of products.

For example, a consumer may not like Starbucks coffee, but maybe they will like Starbucks ice cream. Both products are grouped under the Starbucks product line, so Starbucks profits from the sale of both. More broadly, a product mix refers to the total number of product lines that a company owns.

This includes the width, length, depth, and consistency of the company’s product mix. Width is the total number of product lines a company owns, length is the total number of products, depth is the total number of alternate versions of the product, and consistency is the degree of similarity between each product line in relation to each other.

An example of product mix would be Starbucks’s inclusion of both whole bean and dark roast coffee. In contrast, product extension simply refers to the expansion of the product line to include product alterations that meet market demand. This extension could include introducing lower-priced products (down-market), higher-priced products (up-market), or both (two-way).

Starbucks would be an “up-market” stretch. Finally, product filling refers to the increase in the number of products within a given product line in order to meet market demand. An example would be Starbucks introducing Pumpkin Spice Lattes in order to meet seasonal demands.

Difference Between Verbal And Nonverbal Communication

Difference Between Verbal And Nonverbal Communication

Verbal communication includes both face-to-face conversation between people and written communication. It includes sounds, words, or speaking.

Nonverbal communication includes gestures, facial expressions, body movement, timing, touch, and anything else done without speaking. People seem to notice nonverbal communication more than verbal. For this reason, it’s important to control yourself nonverbally. Tone of voice, volume, and pitch are all ways to effectively communicate nonverbally.

Language barriers sometimes affect communication. American gestures mean different things in different countries. It’s important to be aware of these different meanings when traveling or working with people from a different culture.

Nonverbal combined with verbal communication can be interpreted in different ways. People may seem very confused if someone is speaking in a polite tone while swearing at them. Usually people’s nonverbal communication signals their mood. Communication can either be seen as passive or aggressive depending on both verbal and nonverbal clues.

The combination of both verbal and nonverbal communication is key to effectively communicating with other people.

The four pillars of the National Honor Society

The four pillars of the national honor society

The four pillars of the national honor society are character,scholarship,leadership and service.

Because this is an essay for National Honor Society, you probably want to reveal a little bit about yourself within it, rather than writing a dry and objective essay. (I assume this essay is part of your application.)

The “dominant” pilar to me would suggest the one I most easily excelled in. Then I would talk about why that pilar was my strength, and how the others were either byproducts of such a strength, or characteristics necessary to have this strength.

So I would probably choose leadership. I happen to be a pretty natural leader and always have been. I would write one paragraph about how my character affected my leadership ability, one paragraph about how my grades were affected by my leadership, and vice versa, and finally, a paragraph about how service is a natural by-product of being a good leader.

Do you see where you have a lot of room to make this essay personal, and that there isn’t really one correct way to write it?

Why did the Articles of Confederation fail?

Why did the Articles of Confederation fail?

There were several reasons why the government created by the Articles of Confederation failed. This plan of government was designed to create a weak federal government. This caused many problems.

There were financial problems. Because the federal government did not have the power to tax, it had trouble raising money. As a result, the US had difficulty repaying its debts. When too much paper money was printed, inflation occurred.

The US also had difficulty dealing with the aggressive actions of other countries toward it. Great Britain would not leave the western lands. Additionally, countries such as Spain and Great Britain interfered with trade. Since the government could not force people to join the military, the military was very small. With little money available for supplies, the military was poorly equipped. As a result, the US was in no position to fight against these countries that were causing problems for it.

The government created by the Articles of Confederation had other issues. Because there were no federal courts, the states had no place where they could resolve disputes. Additionally, it took nine of the thirteen states to pass a law and thirteen of the thirteen states to change the Articles of Confederation. Finally, Shays’ Rebellion showed that, at times, the federal government had trouble keeping order.

Eventually, a decision was made to attempt to write a new plan of government. The Constitution was eventually created and adopted.

They failed because they did not manage to convince the elites of society that their interests would be protected by the sorts of governments that sprang up under the Articles.

During the time that the US was under the Articles, there were various kinds of economic problems. The state governments’ responses to the problems (spurred by the demands of the common people who were being hurt most by the problems) hurt the interests of the elites. They also convinced the elites that the nation would not be able to prosper economically under the sorts of governments that would take those steps.

So, the Articles failed because the elites who took the most interest in government felt that the governments were acting in ways that were bad for a) the interests of the elites and b) the long-term interests of the country as a whole.

Pride And Prejudice Summary

Pride And Prejudice Summary

A short summary of Pride and Prejudice may cause Jane Austen to groan aloud, but I’ll try. Five daughters of a country gentleman who married for beauty and lived to regret it, are enticed by their foolish (though a gentlewoman) mother’s announcement of two eligible bachelors in the neighborhood who are newly come down from London. The meetings between the five daughters and these two, as well as other eligible bachelors, at balls result in hoped for love for one sister, disdain and infatuation and irritation from three separate bachelors for another sister, a dangerous elopement for a third sister, and nothing much more than scoldings for the other two sisters.

Jane hopes for marriage with Mr. Bingley but her evenly bestowed smiles lead Darcy to convince Bingley that his love is not returned, while Darcy finds greater and greater attraction in Elizabeth whom he thought too unexceptional to dance with at the Meryton ball. Darcy’s old enemy, Wickham, accidentally arrives on the scene and turns Elizabeth’s head–and heart–with gossip about Darcy that steels Elizabeth’s negative opinion against Darcy. When a visit to Rosings Park to visit Charlotte–Elizabeth’s best friend who shocked her by marrying the cousin whom Elizabeth had strongly rejected–exposes Elizabeth to a proposal of marriage form Mr. Darcy, Elizabeth begins a journey of self-discovery.

When a holiday with her Aunt and Uncle surprises Elizabeth with a tour of Pemberley, Darcy’s estate and manor house, and then surprises her with the unannounced presence of Darcy himself, Elizabeth’s future begins to look brighter as Darcy seems to have taken some of her scathing insults to heart when she rejected his proposal and made himself into a kinder person. But news of Lydia’s strange elopement with Darcy’s enemy, Wickham, throws Elizabeth on Darcy’s mercy and ends her newly sprung hopes of a renewal of his affections. Darcy recognizes his fault of prideful silence in Wickham’s being allowed to socialize with respectable families and immediately goes to set things right.

After making amends for the harm his pride and ill-judged decisions had caused, Darcy and Bingley return to Netherfield Park and visit the Bennet home. This time Bingley knows his affection is returned and Darcy knows, because of the outcome of Elizabeth’s interview with Darcy’s meddling aunt, Lady de Bourgh, that Elizabeth may no longer despise him. Both ladies and men receive their heart’s desires when each couple finds a moment to be alone and two weddings are joyously celebrated.

War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength

War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength what do these 3 slogans mean?

This 1984 novel is constructed through paradox and contrasts. These three slogans of the Party reflect these aspects, in that the way the Party controls Oceania is actually the opposite of the propaganda it produces. Thus, according to the Party, “war is peace” means that they continually “fight” wars in order to keep peace at home.

During times of war, nations generally unite. Of course, if the people are focused on a common enemy, they are much less inclined to notice how unhappy they are in their own lives. So they make less trouble for their government. “Freedom is slavery” can be thought of in the same way: the slavery of Party members equals freedom for Party leaders. Finally, “Ignorance is strength” can be read “Your ignorance is our strength”, again meaning that the ignorance of the people translates into the strength of the government.

It goes directly into the concept of doublethink, which Emmanuel Goldstein explains through the word “blackwhite”:

But it means also the ability to believe that black is white, and more, to know that black is white, and to forget that one has ever believed the contrary. This demands a continuous alteration of the past, made possible by the system of thought which really embraces all the rest, and which is known in Newspeak as doublethink.

Doublethink is basically the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.

“Doublethink” is the epitome of paradox, and is the key to the Party’s control. Through this concept, people can essentially “forget” the past, even when the Party changes that past weekly.

Coupled with their propaganda, it makes it nearly impossible for anyone to verify their thought…or even want to. If you can’t look up the story you thought you heard last week, how can you be sure what the truth truly is?

“Goodnight Sweet Prince” What is the meaning behind this quote from Hamlet

“Goodnight Sweet Prince” What is the meaning behind this quote from Hamlet

Horatio certainly does not die at the end of the play, although he does attempt to commit suicide by drinking the last of the poisoned wine in the cup. He tells Hamlet:

I am more an antique Roman than a Dane.
Here’s yet some liquor left.

But Hamlet takes the cup away from him, saying:

Give me the cup. Let go. By heaven, I’ll ha’t!
O God, Horatio, what a wounded name,
“Things standing thus unknown, shall live behind me!
If thou didst ever hold me in thy heart
Absent thee from felicity awhile,
And in this harsh world draw thy breath in pain,
To tell my story.

Shakespeare is really mainly concerned about the impression that will be left with his audience. If Hamlet died without leaving someone behind who could explain what had happened from start to finish, the audience would feel somewhat dissatisfied with the conclusion.

All the principals would be dead–Claudius, Gertrude, Polonius, Ophelia, Rosencrantz, Guildenstern, and Hamlet. It would look to the courtiers as if Hamlet murdered Claudius and also murdered Laertes with a poison-tipped foil in their duel. But if Horatio remained alive, he could explain everything to the people in the court, to the commoners, and to the new king Fortinbras.

Horatio knows everything that happened, including Hamlet’s meeting with his father’s ghost, which he personally observed. Horatio knows that Claudius was guilty of murdering his brother and seizing his crown and his wife. Horatio witnessed Claudius’ behavior at the play within a play, where the king revealed his guilt. What Horatio has not personally observed, he has learned directly from his friend Hamlet. It was therefore essential that Horatio remain alive to leave Shakespeare’s audience with a feeling that there was a full and proper closure.

He is merely saying goodbye to his friend. Horatio is the only person in the play who understands Hamlet’s “noble heart,” so it is fitting that he is the person who sends him to heaven in eloquence.

How do you Calculate the Number of Neutrons from Periodic Table?

To calculate the number of neutrons in an atom, you have to either memorize the formula, or better yet, understand how different numbers on the periodic table are derived so you can calculate it from there.

The formula for finding out the number of neutrons in an atom is atomic mass – atomic number. The intuition behind this hinges on how the atomic mass presented on the periodic table is calculated. The atomic mass of an atom is determined by only the number of protons and neutrons. Even though subatomic particles includes electrons as well, the mass of electrons is so insignificant that they are essentially negligible in this calculation. You also have to know that the atomic number of an element on the periodic table to equal to the number of protons that atom contains. It then makes perfect sense why the number of neutrons is equal to the atomic mass (protons + neutrons) minus the atomic number (protons only).

On the periodic table you are given the atomic number (top number) and the mass number (bottom number) of each element. The mass number is the sum of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. The atomic number is the number of protons. Therefore, you can subtract the atomic number from the mass number to find the number of neutrons.

For example, Carbon’s atomic number/number of protons is 6 and the mass number is 12.011. This means there are 6 neutrons (approximately).

The number of neutrons can be calculated by simply looking at the Periodic Table of Elements.

The number of neutrons= mass number – atomic number

Each element in the table has the mass number (atomic weight) located directly under the Element name and the atomic number is located at the top left hand corner of an element in the table.

Don’t forget to round the mass number (atomic weight) to the nearest whole number.