Assembly Bomb Case of Shaheed Bhagat Singh

The Biography of Famous Personalities of India will tell you about the controversies, the dark sides of a person that you may have never heard of.

Assembly Bomb Case of Shaheed Bhagat Singh

Assembly Bomb Case

If the deaf are to hear, the sound has to be very loud.

In the face of actions by the revolutionaries, the British government enacted the Defence of India Act to give more power to the police. The purpose of the Act was to combat revolutionaries like Azad and Bhagat Singh. The Act was defeated in the council by one vote.
Assembly Bomb Case of Shaheed Bhagat Singh 1
However, the Act was then passed under the ordinance that claimed that it was in the best interest of the public. In response to this act, the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association planned to explode a bomb in the Central Legislative Assembly where the ordinance was going to be passed.

Initially, Chandra Shekhar Azad, attempted to stop Bhagat Singh from carrying out the bombing. However, the remainder of the party forced him to succumb to Bhagat Singh’s wishes. It was decided that Bhagat Singh and Batukeshwar Dutt would throw the bomb in the assembly.

Bhagat Singh wanted to use the British courts to publicize the cause of independence of India in the world through media by throwing a bomb which should not cause any damage to life and property but should make noise and smoke only and to surrender and face trial in the court to publicize.

On April 8, 1929, Bhagat Singh and Batukeshwar Dutt threw a bomb onto the corridors of the assembly and shouted “Inquilab Zindabad!” (Long Live the Revolution!). This was followed by a shower of leaflets stating that it takes a loud voice to make the deaf hear. The bomb neither killed nor injured anyone; Bhagat Singh and BK Dutt claimed that this was deliberate on their part, a claim substantiated both by British forensic investigators who found that the bomb was not powerful enough to cause injury, and by the fact that the bomb was thrown away from people.

A statement issued later said : “The Bomb was necessary to awaken England from her dreams. We dropped the bomb on the floor of the Assembly Chamber to register our protest on behalf of those who had no other means to give expression to their heart-rending agony. Our sole purpose was to make the deaf hear.”

The red leaflet was more expressive. It was signed by Balraj (assumed name of Azad) in his capacity as the Commander- in-Chief of the Hindustan Republican Army (The Auxiliary Wing). The leaflet read:

“In these extreme provocative circumstances, the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association, in all seriousness, realizing their full responsibility, has decided and ordered its Army to do this particular action, so that a stop be put to this humiliating force and to let the alien bureaucratic exploiters do what they wish, but they must be made to come before the public eye in their naked form.

Let the representatives of the people return to their constituencies and prepare the masses for the coming revolution, and let the Government know that while protesting against the Public Safety and Trade Disputes Bills and the callous murder of Lala Lajpat Rai, on behalf of the helpless Indian masses, we want to emphasize the lesson often repeated by history, that it is easy to kill individuals but you cannot kill the ideas.

Great empires crumbled while ideas survived. We are sorry to admit that we who attach so great a sanctity to human life, we who dream of a glorious future, when man will be enjoying perfect peace and full liberty, have been forced to shed human blood. But the sacrifices of individuals at the altar of ‘Great Revolution’ that will bring freedom to all, rendering the exploitation of man by man impossible, is inevitable.”

After the bomb explosion in the Assembly Bhagat Singh and BK Dutt surrendered to the police themselves as they had planned to publicize the cause of Indian Independence through media during court trial. They were also of the view that they will not be sentenced for long as the bomb they exploded was not a lethal one.
Assembly Bomb Case of Shaheed Bhagat Singh 2
The bombs thrown into the Assembly Hall killed no one. Four or five persons received minor injuries; that was all.

The dramatic demonstration of protest was met with widespread criticisms from the Congress. Bhagat Singh responded – “Force when aggressively applied is ‘violence’ and is, therefore, morally unjustifiable, but when it is used in the furtherance of a legitimate cause, it has its moral justification.”

It was not the revolutionaries’ object to kill anybody. The incident drew the attention of the entire world. The HSRA name became a household word. The British Government trembled to the core.

Trial proceedings commenced in May 1929 where Bhagat Singh sought to defend himself, while Batukeshwar Dutt was represented by Afsar Ali. The court ruled in favour of a life sentence citing malicious and unlawful intent of the explosions.

Shortly after the arrest of Bhagat Singh and trial for the Assembly bombing, the British came to know of his involvement in the murder of JP Saunders. Consequently, Bhagat Singh, Rajguru, and Sukhdev were charged with the murder. Bhagat Singh had decided to use the court as a tool to publicize his cause for the independence of India. He admitted to the murder and made statements against the British rule during the trial. The case was ordered to be carried out without members of the HSRA present at the hearing. This created an uproar amongst Bhagat Singh’s supporters as he could no longer publicise his views in the media.

Soon after the sentencing, the police raided the HSRA bomb factories in Lahore and arrested several prominent revolutionaries. Three individuals, Hans Raj Vohra, Jai Gopal and Phanindra Nath Ghosh turned approvers for the Government which led to a total of 21 arrests including those of Sukhdev, Jatin Das and Rajguru. Bhagat Singh was rearrested for the Lahore Conspiracy case, murder of Saunders and bomb manufacturing. Trial started against 28 accused in a special session court, on July 10, 1929.

Shaheed Bhagat Singh Avenging Lalaji’s Death

The Biography of Famous Personalities of India will tell you about the controversies, the dark sides of a person that you may have never heard of.

Shaheed Bhagat Singh Avenging Lalaji’s Death

Avenging Lalaji’s Death

The Sanctity of Law can be maintained only so tong as it is the expression of the will of the people.

The Dussehra Bomb case involving Bhagat Singh was still going on. At last he was released. He was not now on bail. At once Bhagat Singh closed the milk dairy. He returned to work for the revolution. After attending a meeting of revolutionaries in Delhi in 1928, he never returned home.

In Delhi, Chandra Shekhar Azad, a young revolutionary, was introduced to Bhagat Singh. It was as if fire and wind were united. The activities of the revolutionaries gained new strength. Bhagat Singh shaved his beard and had a closer crop, so that the police might not recognize him.

They joined a revolutionary party called The Hindustan Republican Association (HRA)’. The name was later changed to The Hindustan Socialist Republican Association (HSRA). Its aim was to establish a republic in India by means of an armed revolution. HRA was founded by Sachindra Nath Sanyal, Ram Prasad Bismil and Jogesh Chandra Chatterjee in 1924 and had executed the Kakori train robbery case.
Shaheed Bhagat Singh Avenging Lalaji’s Death 1
Chandara Shekhar Azad was elected the Commander-in-Chief of armed wing of the party. Plans to manufacture bombs to be used against the Simon Commission and to rob a bank at Bettiah were made.

To throw bombs at the Simon Commission was one of the decisions taken at Feroze Shah Kotla, Delhi meeting. Together, they planned and executed many revolutionary activities. Their group was supposed to be the greatest terror group for British government and police.

With the success of the Russian revolution in 1917, Azad and many other revolutionaries like Bhagat Singh were increasingly coming under the influence of socialist ideas.

Under Azad’s leadership, all young revolutionaries (Bejoy Kumar Sinha, Shiv Varma and Jaidev Kapur in UP, Bhagat Singh, Bhagwati Charan Vohra and Sukhdev in Punjab) met in Ferozshah Kotla Ground in Delhi on September 9 and 10, 1928 and re-organized Hindustan Republican Association into Hindustan Socialist Republican Association (HSRA).

The leadership of the new organization was collective and their goal was socialism. Chandra Shekhar was appointed the ‘Commander of the military Division of the Hindustan Socialist Republican Army’ whose aim was to free India from the British through an organized armed struggle. The leadership of HSRA decided to move away from individual heroic action towards mass politics. However, the death of Lala Lajpat Rai from a brutal lathi-charge on anti-Simon Commission demonstration on October 30, 1928 changed the course of HSRA.

In February 1928, a committee from England visited India. It came to be known as the Simon Commission. The purpose of its visit was to decide how much freedom and responsibility could be given to the people of India. But there was no Indian on the committee. Naturally Indians were very angry. They decided to make it impossible for the Commission to work and drive it back to England. Wherever the committee went, people protested with black flags, shouting “Simon, go back.”

As the Simon Commission reached Lahore on 30 October, 1928 it had to face a big procession opposed to it. Thousands of people took part in it. Its leader was the elderly patriot, Lala Lajpat Rai. Trouble started near the railway station itself. The revolutionaries did not allow the Simon Commission to proceed. The police could not protect the members. By that time, the Police Superintendent, one Scott by name, ordered a lathi charge. The police began to beat people with heavy sticks. People started running. But Lajpat Rai and his companions did not budge.

A police officer rushed forward and hit Lajpat Rai on the chest with his lathi. It was a powerful blow. Lajpat Rai was an old man. The blow proved fatal to him. He suffered for about three weeks and died on 17 November, 1928.

In his death, the revolutionaries suffered a heavy loss. They decided that they should take revenge and that they should kill Scott who ordered the lathi-charge. They thought of a plan. A revolutionary by name Jai Gopal was to observe Scott’s movements. Bhagat Singh and Rajguru were to shoot him. They had to plan carefully their escape. This was planned under the leadership of Chandra Shekhar Azad.

But in the beginning itself, a small mistake was committed. Jai Gopal mistook another police officer Saunders for Scott.

The appointed day came. That evening Saunders came out of the police station and got on his motorcycle. Jai Gopal who was hiding, gave a signal. Bhagat Singh and Rajguru were waiting on the way. As the motorcycle neared Rajguru shot at Saunders from his pistol. At once Bhagat Singh also fired. Saunders fell down dead. All the three fled the scene. The police chased them. They also killed a chasing police constable. They rushed into a lodge nearby. Then they escaped from the place.

The whole city was filled with the news of Saunders’ murder. The police spies began a search for the murderers all over the city.

A police officer rushed forward and hit Lajpat Rai on the chest with his lathi. It was a powerful blow. Lajpat Rai was an old man. The blow proved fatal to him. He suffered for about three weeks and died on 17 November, 1928.

In his death, the revolutionaries suffered a heavy loss. They decided that they should take revenge and that they should kill Scott who ordered the lathi-charge. They thought of a plan. A revolutionary by name Jai Gopal was to observe Scott’s movements. Bhagat Singh and Rajguru were to shoot him. They had to plan carefully their escape. This was planned under the leadership of Chandra Shekhar Azad.

But in the beginning itself, a small mistake was committed. Jai Gopal mistook another police officer Saunders for Scott.

The appointed day came. That evening Saunders came out of the police station and got on his motorcycle. Jai Gopal who was hiding, gave a signal. Bhagat Singh and Rajguru were waiting on the way. As the motorcycle neared Rajguru shot at Saunders from his pistol. At once Bhagat Singh also fired. Saunders fell down dead. All the three fled the scene. The police chased them. They also killed a chasing police constable. They rushed into a lodge nearby. Then they escaped from the place.

The whole city was filled with the news of Saunders’ murder. The police spies began a search for the murderers all over the city.

Next day posters appeared on the walls in all the streets of Lahore. They declared, “Lala Lajpat Rai’s death is avenged. Saunders has been murdered.” Besides, there were some words of caution addressed to the Government. The posters also contained the name of The Hindustan Socialist Republican Army in red letters. So everyone could know who were behind the murder of Saunders. The people’s respect for the Kranti Dal grew. Saunders’ murder shook the British Government.

Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Chandra Shekhar Azad—all three escaped from Lahore. Bhagat Singh dressed himself as a foreign youth and wore a hat. Durga Bhabhi, the wife of a revolutionary by name Bhagavaticharan, and their child accompanied Bhagat Singh, so that people would think they were Bhagat Singh’s wife and child. These three traveled by train in a first class compartment. Rajguru left the place disguised as an ordinary worker. Azad traveled as a Brahmin pundit with a pilgrim party for Mathura, with elderly ladies and other people. The railway station was filled with eagle-eyed spies; but all the three went away from Lahore.

The police extensively searched for Bhagat Singh and Rajguru, but could not find them. Three months passed.

The revolutionaries needed large number of bombs to drive out the British. Bhagat Singh met Phanendra on 25th becember at the Indian National Congress Session at Calcutta. They persuaded Jatin Das to help them in making bombs. Gun Poster—After Saunders’ Murder

“Notice”
By Hindustan Socialist Republican Army
‘Bureaucracy Beware’

With the death of J.P. Saunders the assassination of Lala Lajpat Rai has been avenged.

It is a matter of great regret that a respect leader of 30 crore of people was attacked by an ordinary police officer like J.P. Saunders and met with his death at his mean hands. This national insult was a challenge to young men.

Today the world has seen that the people of India are not lifeless; their blood has not become cold. They can lay down their lives for the country’s honour. The proof of this has been given by the youth who are ridiculed and insulted by the leaders of their own country.

‘Tyrant Government Beware’

Do not hurt the feelings of the oppressed suffering people of this country. Stop your devilish ways. Despite all your laws preventing us from keeping arms and despite all your watchfulness, people of this country would continue to get pistols and revolvers. Even if these arms are not adequate in numbers for an armed revolution, they would be sufficient for avenging the insult to the country’s honour. Even if our own people condemn us and ridicule us and if foreign government subjects us to any amount of repression, we shall all be ever ready to teach a lesson to foreign tyrants who insult our national honour. Despite all opposition and repression, we shall carry forward the call for revolution and even we go to the scaffold for being hanged, we shall continue to shout:

“Long Live Revolution!”

We are sorry to have killed a man. But this man was a part of cruel, despicable and unjust system and killing him was a necessity. This man has been killed as an employ of the British Government. This Government is the most oppressive government in the world.

We are sorry for shedding human blood but it becomes necessary to bathe the altar of Revolution with blood. Our aim is to bring about a revolution which would end all exploitation of man by man.

“Long live Revolution!”
Sd/- Balraj
Commander in Chief, HSRA
18th December, 1928.

Balraj was the pseudonym of Chandra Shekhar Azad. Both wings of the Hindustan Republican Association (HRA) were rechristened HSRA on September 8 and 9,1928, at Ferozeshah Kotla in Delhi.

Cotton was made at the Arya Samaj Mandir residence of Kanwal Nath Tiwari. The prepared material was then shifted to party headquarter at Agra.

The revolutionaries, sometimes for three days together, lived only on a cup of tea. They did not have beds or rugs though it was biting cold. They were starving. And all the while the thought of the police plagued them. In the midst of all this they went on with their sacred work. And, for money they would sometimes loot government offices.

Work of bomb making started at Hing Ki Mandi party headquarter on 14 February. Jatin Das prepared shells of bombs to fill in the material. Sukhdev went to the Punjab with a sample shell and got many more prepared. Bombs were filled on 24 February 1928. Bhagat Singh, Azad and Phanendra tested the bombs in the ravines of Jhansi.

The party headquarter was shifted to Saharanpur by the end of March 1928.

Bhagat Singh Entering Freedom Revolution and Revolutionary Activities

The Biography of Famous Personalities of India will tell you about the controversies, the dark sides of a person that you may have never heard of.

Bhagat Singh Entering Freedom Revolution and Revolutionary Activities

Entering Freedom Revolution

I emphasize that I am full of ambition and hope and of the full charm of life. But I can renounce all at the time of need, and that is real sacrifice.

Bhagat Singh did not confine himself to the study of books. The more he learned about revolution, the greater grew his desire to participate in it. He established contact with the revolutionary party of the province.

Every member of the party had to accept one condition. At the call of its leader, he had to be ready to quit home and join him. Bhagat Singh agreed to this condition. But his grandmother insisted that he should get married first. So a girl was chosen. A day was fixed for the formal decision to get him married.

The day was fast approaching. But just then the leader of the revolution called him. Bhagat Singh quitely left home and went to Lahore. For sometime thereafter, nobody knew where he went. Before leaving home, Bhagat Singh wrote a letter; he wrote, “The aim of my life is to fight for India’s freedom. I don’t wish for worldly pleasures. I have promised to sacrifice myself for the sake of the country. Accordingly I am now giving up my own happiness and going out to serve the country.”

Then Bhagat Singh reached Kanpur. First he earned his bread there by selling newspapers. Then he came to know a revolutionary Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi. He got a job in the office of his periodical The Pratap’. And he also learnt his first lessons as a revolutionary.

At home his parents were much worried about him. His grandmother, then seriously ill, was very eager to see him. His family searched for him everywhere and ultimately brought him back home on the promise of not to get him married.

Even at home, Bhagat Singh could not sit idle. At that time the Akali Dal arranged a procession. But in order to prevent it, the District Collector issued an order: Nobody should supply either food or drink to the members of the Akali Dal.

Bhagat Singh thought of helping the Akali Dal people visiting his village. He explained the situation to the villagers and arranged to supply food secretly to the Akali Dal people at night. Thus a week passed. The Dal’s program went on continuously and successfully. Throughout the day, there used to be talks on the country’s freedom and the duty of the people. Bhagat Singh also used to speak enthusiastically.

The Collector grew angry that the people had helped the Dal against his orders. He issued a warrant to arrest Bhagat Singh. But Bhagat Singh was only seventeen then. He was a minor and could not be arrested.

Revolutionary Activities

The people generally get accustomed to the established order of things and begin to tremble at the very idea of a change. It is this lethargical spirit that needs be replaced by the revolutionary spirit.

Initially, Bhagat Singh’s activities were limited to writing corrosive articles against the British Government, printing and distributing pamphlets outlining principles of a violent uprising, aimed at overthrowing the Government. Considering his influence on the youth, and his association with the Akali movement, he became a person of interest for the government.

Bhagat Singh had caught the eye of the police. His movements were carefully watched by spies.

Once, as he was just leaving by the train at Amritsar, the spies followed him. Trying to escape from them, he began to run. He rushed into a lawyer’s house and escaped from the police. Then he traveled to Lahore. When the train reached Lahore, he was caught by the police and sent to Lahore Jail.

But Bhagat Singh did not know why he was arrested. In fact, a few days earlier some rogues had thrown a bomb on procession during the Dussehra Festival. It killed some people. The police suspected the hand of revolutionaries in it. That was why they arrested Bhagat Singh and pushed him into jail. To find out the secrets of other revolutionaries, they tortured him in many ways. But Bhagat Singh did not admit his involvement in the bombing, and actually he was not involved in it.
Bhagat Singh Entering Freedom Revolution and Revolutionary Activities 1
Finally, a Magistrate decided that Bhagat Singh could be released only on a bail of sixty thousand rupees which was a large amount those days. Yet, out of sheer affection for Bhagat Singh, two rich persons came forward. They were Duneechand and Daulatram. On their surety, Bhagat Singh was set free on bail.

As per the conditions of bail, if Bhagat Singh participated in revolutionary activities during the period of bail, the two sureties would have to pay sixty thousand rupees to the Government. Bhagat Singh did not wish that others should be troubled on his account. That was why he decided to keep quiet during the period of bail. At this time his father built a cowshed in his native place, so that Bhagat Singh could run a small dairy. Bhagat Singh took up that work in earnest.

Every day he got up at four. Then he fed the cows, removed the cowdung and cleaned the shed. Next he milked the cows and sold the milk. It was all systematic, and tidily done. Whatever he undertook Bhagat Singh did a good job.

The entire day he was busy with his dairy, but the night brought thoughts of revolution. He joined his friends for discussions. At the same time, he got into touch with the newspapers, ‘Kirti’ and ‘Akali’. He wrote articles for them. A journal brought out a special issue to honour fighters who had been hanged; Bhagat Singh himself introduced some of the revolutionaries.

Bhagat Singh’s village was too small for his activities. He went to Lahore. Bhagat Singh returned to his home in Lahore after assurance from his parents that he would not be compelled to get married. He established contact with the members of the Kirti Kisan Party and started contributing regularly to its magazine, the ‘Kirti’. There a union of revolutionaries by name ‘Naujavan Bharat Sabha’ was founded. Bhagat Singh became its Secretary.

Like the Kranti Dal in Bengal, the new union started teaching lessons of revolution to the people of Punjab. Outwardly its objects were to spread Indian culture, to make the youth strong and so cn. But the real purpose was to bring about a revolution for the country’s freedom.

Within a few days, it started branches at different places. The celebration of the birthdays of revolutionaries became an important part of the program of the union. The members would take out pictures of revolutionaries, decorated with Khadi garlands, in processions. They would cut their own fingers and put a mark of blood on the foreheads of the heroes in the pictures. They would give lecture about them. It was in those days that Bhagat Singh gained good practice in public speaking. Within a few days he became a good speaker. He got into touch with the students’ unions of colleges. He spread the message of revolution everywhere.

As a student, Bhagat Singh was an avid reader and he would read up about European nationalist movements. Inspired by the writings of Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, his political ideologies took shape and he became more inclined towards a socialist approach. He also wrote in newspapers like ‘Veer Arjun’ under several pseudonyms.

Bhagat Singh Effect of Jallianwala Bagh and Departing Gandhian Path

The Biography of Famous Personalities of India will tell you about the controversies, the dark sides of a person that you may have never heard of.

Bhagat Singh Effect of Jallianwala Bagh and Departing Gandhian Path

Effect of Jallianwala Bagh

I am a man and all that concerns mankind concerns me.

On 13th April 1919 the Baisakhi day, a meeting was in progress at the Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar. The object of the meeting was to register protest against the Rowlett Act It was attended by around twenty thousand people, including children, youths, adults, the old, and men and women of all ages. Jallianwala Bagh had high walls on all four sides, with only one small, narrow passage.
Bhagat Singh Effect of Jallianwala Bagh and Departing Gandhian Path 1
The meeting was peaceful. Meanwhile General Dyer reached there with his battalion. He ordered his soldiers to stand on one side and fire on the unarmed people. People ran helter-skelter but the escape route was unusually narrow. Many people jumped into the well to save their lives, but perished there.

They shot dead a thousand people just in no time. General Dyer saw that the firing continued till his anger cooled off.

In this massacre in all one thousand six hundred shots were fired. As per the Government report, 400 persons died and nearly two thousand were wounded. Later on, the Congress constituted a Commission of Enquiry to go into it. According to its report the number of the dead and the wounded was nearly double of what the government report stated.

The whole India was plunged into deep anguish due to this incident in Punjab.

Bhagat Singh was then only twelve years old; but his mind was deeply disturbed by this event. The next day he did not return home after the school hours. His family at home waited for him very anxiously.

After the school, Bhagat Singh went straight to the place of the tragedy. Somehow managing to push through the police on guard, he went in. He collected a bottle of mud wet with the blood of the innocent Indians killed, and returned home. Seeing that he was late, his younger sister said, “Where were you all this time? Mother has been waiting for you with food ready”. But Bhagat Singh was not at all thinking of food. Showing the bottle in his hand, he said, “Look here. This is the blood of our people killed by the British. Salute this.”

Then young Bhagat Singh put the bottle in a niche and worshipped it with flowers.

The common people who had assembled in Jallianwala Bagh carried no weapons. Nor was there a way to escape from the place. And these innocent people were killed by the British police! Such were the thoughts working in the mind of young Bhagat Singh. The feeling that somehow the British must be driven out of India became firmer in his mind.

That was the time when the Indian National Congress was fighting for the country’s freedom. It awakened the people’s love for their country and was uniting the people. Even before entering the ninth class, Bhagat Singh decided to participate in this work. He was only thirteen then.

Young Bhagat Singh told his father of his decision and asked for his permission. Himself a revolutionary, Sardar Kishan Singh willingly gave his consent. Bhagat Singh joined the freedom movement.

At that time, there was running a powerful “Swadeshi” anti-foreign cloth movement in the country. “If the foreign cloth was bought, other countries were benefited. In order to end this, all ought to wear cloth made in our country. Foreign cloth must be burnt”—so the leaders taught. Bhagat Singh took part in this movement with great zeal. Right from his early days, he used to wear only Khadi. Every week he would collect foreign clothes, heap them up and burn them.

Patriotism flowed in his veins from the days of his childhood. By the time he completed his secondary education, Bhagat Singh knew everything about the revolutionaries of his family. He had learnt all the details about them at home. And the desire to fight for the country’s freedom grew strong in him.

Bhagat Singh’s eldest brother Jagat Singh died at the age of 11. After this Sardar Kishan Singh shifted to Nawankot near Lahore where he had some land. Bhagat Singh was admitted to DAV School, Lahore. He passed the matriculation examination from there only.

When Bhagat Singh was in 9th standard he had the opportunity to attend the meeting of Congress. His father took him to Belgaum Congress held in 1924 which was presided over by Mahatma Gandhi.

Departing Gandhian Path

Any man who stands for progress has to criticize, disbelieve and challenge every item of the old faith.

To continue his studies, Bhagat Singh joined the National College. This college had been started by great patriots like Lala Lajpat Rai. Though he had not been to school for some time, Bhagat Singh had a good knowledge of history and politics. The Principal was astonished and permitted him to join the college straight away.

During the day he would listen to the lessons in the class. In the evening he would collect several friends and discuss the coming revolution. This became his daily routine. While in the college he was very intimate with Sukhdev and Yashpal.

At college, Bhagat Singh took part in several plays. A teacher who saw him in the leading roles in ‘Rana Pratap’ and ‘Samrat Chandragupta1 remarked, “This boy will become a great man.”

In the beginning Bhagat Singh was a devout Gandhian. But the Chauri Chaura backlash dismayed not only Gandhiji but also Bhagat Singh, a lad of only fifteen years. Then the heroic martyrdom of Khudi Ram, Kanailal and Kartar Singh made him pin his faith on armed revolution.
Bhagat Singh Effect of Jallianwala Bagh and Departing Gandhian Path 2
In 1922, the Congress organized a procession in the town of Chauri Chaura in Gorakhpur District. Then some rogues locked up twenty-two policemen together in a house, set fire to the house and burnt them. Before this, similar acts of violence had occurred even in Bombay and Madras. Mahatma Gandhi felt very sad at all this. He asked the people to end the non-cooperation movement which was then going on in the country.

That was a great disappointment to young Bhagat Singh, a lad of fifteen. Should an important movement be given up, just because 22 persons died? Before that, a nineteen-year-old revolutionary by name Kartar Singh had been hanged by the British Government. Then none of these supporters of non-violence raised any objection. How could non-violence become so important now? Such thoughts weakened Bhagat Singh’s faith in non-violence and non-cooperation movements. He went on firmly believing that armed revolution was the only practical way of winning freedom.

Young Bhagat Singh and contemporaries like Azad were deeply and emotionally influenced by that tragedy. Azad, Bhagat Singh and many others then distanced themselves from the path of Gandhi. They were more attracted by the aggressive and violent revolutionary ideals and means to achieve the freedom of India.

Bhagat Singh made a deep study of the lives of the revolutionaries of Ireland, Italy and Russia. The more he read, the deeper grew his belief that war alone could bring freedom. The youth of the land should be inspired to turn to revolution. The very thought of fighting for freedom should thrill the young men. So thinking, Bhagat Singh began to organize the youth.

He was also deeply moved by the activities of the European anarchists like Proudhan, Bakunin and Kropotkin. He was sensitized by the exploits of the Russian nihilists, of the young Turks in Turkey and the Afro-American Negroes over their racialist tormentors. He subscribed to the theories of the anti-Italy and anti-Russia radicalists. Thus Bhagat Singh, the manque-radicalist grew up on the balanced diet of the European radicalism.

Childhood and Early Life of Shaheed Bhagat Singh

The Biography of Famous Personalities of India will tell you about the controversies, the dark sides of a person that you may have never heard of.

Childhood and Early Life of Shaheed Bhagat Singh

Childhood and Early Life

I shall grow guns all over the field and drive the British out of India.

Bhagat Singh was born on 28 September 1907 at village Banga in Lyallpur district of Punjab (now in Pakistan) to Sardar Kishan Singh and Vidyawati. At the time of his birth, his father Kishan Singh, uncles Ajit Singh and Swaran Singh were in jail for demonstrations against the Colonization Bill implemented in 1906.
Childhood and Early Life of Shaheed Bhagat Singh 1
His uncle, Sardar Ajit Singh, was a proponent of the movement and established the Indian Patriots’ Association. He was well-supported by his friend Syed Haidar Raza in organizing the peasants against the Chenab Canal Colony Bill. Ajit Singh had 22 cases against him and was forced to flee to Iran. his family was the supporter of the Ghadar party and the politically aware environment at home helped incite a sense of patriotism in the heart of Bhagat Singh in his childhood itself.
Childhood and Early Life of Shaheed Bhagat Singh 2
One evening child Bhagat Singh was out for a walk with his father. There was also an elderly man with the father. Chatting they walked on and went beyond the village. Green crop delighted their eyes. The elders were walking along the edge of a field. Not hearing the footsteps of the boy, the father looked back. Bhagat Singh was sitting on the ground and seemed to be planting something. The father became curious.

“What are you doing?” asked he.

“I shall grow guns all over the field” was the innocent reply of Bhagat Singh. His eyes shone with the strong faith that guns would grow in the field to drive British out of India. Both the elders were struck with wonder at the little boy’s words. Truly, Bhagat Singh later fought like a hero for India’s freedom and sacrificed his life to drive British out of India.

Bhagat Singh was a lovely child. His smile was charming. People used to say that he would become very famous some day. His mother Vidyawati’s life had been full of sorrow right from the beginning, the revolutionary husband would always be away. Always lurking in Vidyavati’s mind was the fear that he might at any time be sent to jail. It was a family of freedom fighters and one or the other would always be in jail. Vidyawati herself had to look after the affairs of the family. At such anxious times, her children were her only comfort. They were intelligent and brave and this made her forget her misery.

Child Bhagat Singh was admitted to the primary school. From his childhood he was highly interested in studies. He was ahead of the others in his class. He used to write in beautiful hand. He was the favourite pupil of his teachers. Very much liked by his class-mates, he was their leader. Big boys used to carry child Bhagat Singh on their shoulders to the school and back home. His childhood itself indicated that later he would become a leader of some sort.

Child Bhagat Singh easily made friends with one and all. His companions were naturally his friends. But ordinary cartmen and coolies, and the very men who swept the streets were also his friends.

“Every one in the village is my friend,” Bhagat Singh used to say. The ability to win the hearts of men grew in Bhagat Singh right from his childhood. Bhagat Singh had two uncles — Swarn Singh and Ajit Singh. They had been sent to prison by the British. Life in prison was wretched and Swarn Singh fell ill. His health did not improve even after his release and he died. When Ajit Singh came out of the jail, he left the country.
Childhood and Early Life of Shaheed Bhagat Singh 3
Bhagat Singh’s aunts would often recall their husbands’ misery, and lament over it. Seeing this, Bhagat Singh would bravely say, “Don’t weep, aunt. When I grow up, I will drive out the British and bring back my uncle. I will take revenge upon the British who are the cause for my uncle’s illness.” On hearing the heroic words of the little boy, the weeping women would often forget their sorrow for the moment.

Once, when he was in the fourth class, Bhagat Singh asked his friends, “What do you wish to become when you grow up?” The boys started thinking.

Then each boy gave a different answer. “I wish to become a doctor,” said one. Another said, “I will become a government officer.” Still another said he would become a merchant; while another said he ‘would marry’. Bhagat Singh then remarked, “Is marriage a big achievement? Anyone can marry. I will become someone to drive the British out of India.”

Bhagat Singh finished his primary education at Banga. Next he went to Lahore to join a secondary school. The patriot Sardar Kishan Singh did not want to admit his son to a school run by the followers of the British. So Bhagat Singh continued his studies in a private school.

Bhagat Singh was a village boy. His father was afraid he would lag behind in his studies. So he engaged a teacher to teach him at home. But within two days the teacher saw how intelligent the boy was. “What can I teach this boy? He has already learnt everything,” said the teacher to Kishan Singh.

Bhagat Singh took to his studies with great zeal. His teachers wondered at his intelligence. He scored good marks in subjects like history, geography and arithmetic. But he had a bad score in English. It must have been because he had always hated the British (English People)!

Liberal Political Thinker, Humanism and Universal Religion of Mohan

The Biography of Famous Personalities of India will tell you about the controversies, the dark sides of a person that you may have never heard of.

Liberal Political Thinker, Humanism and Universal Religion of Mohan

A Liberal Political Thinker

Early political life of Raja Ram Mohan Roy had immense impact on modern Indian history. It actually led to the complete revival of ethical principle of Vedanta school of philosophy as found in Upanishads. He preached about the oneness of God and also made translation of Vedic scriptures into English and co-founded Calcutta Unitarian Society, founded the Brahmo Samaj and also campaigned against Sati. He also sought to integrate Western culture with features of Indian traditions. He also set up schools to modernize education in India.

During this period Roy also worked as political agitator and agent while also being employed by British East India Company and simultaneously pursuing his vocation as a Pandit. In the years spanning from 1796 and 1797 the troika of Carey, Vidyavagish and Roy made-up a religious work known as the Maha Nirvana Tantra (or “Book of the Great Liberation”) and tried to depict it as an antique religious manuscript to “the One True God”.

The judicial section of the document was used in the law courts of the English settlements in Bengal as Hindu Law for adjudicating upon property disputes of zamindari. However, British magistrates and collectors began to suspect it as forgery and its usage as well as the dependence on pundits as sources of Hindu Law was quickly denounced. Vidyavagish had a nasty fall-out with Carey and separated from the group but also maintained ties to Ram Mohan Roy. The importance of Maha Nirvana Tantra for Brahmoism lay in the riches that accumulated to Dwarkanath Tagore and Ram Mohan Roy by its judicial use, and not due to any religious wisdom within.

In 1799, Carey was joined by missionary Joshua Marshman and the printer William Ward at the Danish settlement of Serampore. From 1803 to 1814 Ram Mohan worked in the British East India Company and provided writing service, commencing as private clerk “munshi” to Thomas Woodforde, Registrar of the Appellate Court at Murshidabad, whose distant nephew, also a Magistrate, later made a living off the spurious Maha Nirvana Tantra under the pseudonym Arthur Avalon.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy, in 1815 formed “Atmiya Sabha”, and spent many years at Rangpur and elsewhere with Digby, where he renewed his contacts with Hariharananda. William Carey had, by this time, settled at Serampore and the trio renewed their association with one another.

British East India Company was extracting money from India at a very high rate (about three million pounds a year) in 1838. Raja Ram Mohan Roy estimated how much money was laundered with and what is the exact amount that is driven out of the country. He also predicted that around half of the total revenue collected in India was sent out to England, leaving India to fill taxes with the remaining money.

In the beginning of 19th century, after the Battle of Plassey and Buxar (population of the Muslim community decreased considerably) posed a political threat to the Company. Ram Mohan Roy was now chosen by Carey to be the agitator among them. In the next two decade, after Carey’s secrete tutelage, Ram Mohan Roy started his attack against the citadels of Hinduism of Bengal, namely his own Kulin Brahmin priestly clan (then in control of the many temples of Bengal) and their priestly excesses.

The theological and social issues Carey chose for Ram Mohan Roy were also calculated to weaken the hold of dominant Kulin class most importantly for younger disinherited sons forced into service who formed the mobile gentry or “bhadralok” of Bengal, from the Mughal zamindari system and align them to their new overlords of Company. The Kulin excesses targeted included child marriage and dowry. In fact, Carey tried to convert Roy to Christianity and appointed a religious priest to try to convert him, although the priest himself later accepted Hinduism.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy had a passionate attachment to the concept of liberty. He urged the necessity of personal freedom. Liberty is a priceless possession of the human being and, hence, he was a champion of personal freedom. But liberty is also needed for the nation. Roy had a passion for liberty and equality, yet he showed his respect for property and believed in the freedom of contract. Indeed, he pleaded for state intervention in suppressing evil practices in society and held that it was the duty of the state to protect tenants against the oppression of the landlords.

Ram Mohan Roy accepted the immutable sanctity of natural rights. He believed not only in the natural rights of life, liberty, and pursuit of property, but also championed the moral rights of the individual. His theory of natural rights, however, was constructed in the prevailing Indian conditions. Thus although an exponent of the theory of Natural Rights and freedom, he also advocated state legislation for social reform and educational reconstruction.

As a champion of freedom and democratic rights and a believer in parliamentary democracy, Roy whole-heartedly supported the reform Bill agitation in England. In his opinion, the struggle between the reformers and anti-reformers was nothing but a struggle between liberty and tyranny throughout the world, between justice and injustice and between right and wrong. It should be remembered that Ram Mohan Roy championed the struggle for freedom and democratic rights, not for Indians alone but for the entire human beings in the world.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy had a keen appreciation of the uncompromising freedom of the creative spirit. He wanted the people of India to develop a sense of self confidence, and was a crusader against unreason and superstition. He admired the English people who not only enjoyed civil and political liberty but were interested in promoting freedom, social happiness and rationalism in the areas where their influence extended.

Bipin Chandra Pal while assessing the contribution of Raja Ram Mohan Roy to Indian freedom wrote :

“Raja was the first to deliver the message of political freedom to India. He so keenly felt the loss of this freedom by his people that even as a boy, yet within his teens, he left his country and travelled to Tibet, because he found it difficult to tolerate the domination of his country by another nation, though, subsequently, with close acquaintance with culture and character of the British people, who seemed to him to have been more intelligent, more steady and moderate in their conduct…”

Similarly, Raja Ram Mohan Roy felt quite happy to hear the news of the introduction of constitutional government in Portugal. He supported the struggle for freedom of the Greeks against the Turks. Again, Roy was opposed to the British occupation of Ireland. He collected funds for the relief of the famine stricken people of Ireland.

Humanism and Universal Religion

Being a champion of freedom and rights, Ram Mohan Roy was a great humanist and believed in cooperation, tolerance and fellowship. Roy established the ethical concept of universal love on the basis of the doctrine of ethical personality of God. He was also the exponent of cosmopolitanism and stood for brotherhood and independence.

He had begun with the study of comparative religion but later come to visualize the necessity of a universal religion. Finally, he formulated the scheme of a fundamental spiritual synthesis stressing the unity of religious experience based on the worship of a monotheistic God. Thus he carried forward the traditions of social and spiritual synthesis stressed by Guru Nanak, Kabir and other saints.

Roy believed in universalism and regarded humanity as one family with the different nations and tribes as its branches. In his famous letter written to the French Foreign Minister in 1832, he suggested the establishment of a ‘Congress’ for the settlement of commercial and political disputes. He was a humanitarian and universalist, and like David Hume he also subscribed to the doctrine of universal sympathy. Jeremy Bentham admired Ram Mohan’s Universalism and humanitarianism, and in a letter to him, he said :

” Your works are made known to me by a book in which I read a style which but for the name of the Hindu I should certainly have ascribed to the pen of a superiorily educated and instructed English man.”

Ram Mohan Roy advocated liberal humanitarian nationalism. Emancipation of man from the bondage for ignorance, and social tyranny, his freedom of thought and conscience and his equality with other fellow men were considered as the fundamentals of liberalism. Such free and emancipated individuals, with feeling towards their mother land, could create national unity.

It was through a spiritual and mental revival that Ram Mohan Roy wanted to regenerate the Indian people and unite them into a national fraternity.

Timeline

  • 1772 : Born on 22nd May at Hooghly, West Bengal
  • 1803-1809 : Served with Revenue Deptt. at Calcutta
  • 1809-1814 : Served East India Company as Dewan
  • 1815 : Formed Atmiya Sabha
  • 1817 : Set up Hindu College at Calcutta
  • 1821 : Published Sambad Kaumudi
  • 1822 : Founded first English School & Vedanta College
  • 1828 : Founded Brahmo Samaj
  • 1828 : A Collection of Hymns composed by him
  • 1829-30 : Composed two memorials against muzzling the press by East India Company
  • 1829 : Petition against Sati rite
  • 1830 : Helped establish General Assembly Institution
  • 1830 : Travelled to United Kingdom as an ambassador of Mughal Empire and to ensure the success of Bengal Sati Regulation, 1829
  • 1833 : Died of meningitis on 27th September at Stapleton, northeast of Bristol, England

Ram Mohan is The Maker of Modern India and A Unitarian Journalist

The Biography of Famous Personalities of India will tell you about the controversies, the dark sides of a person that you may have never heard of.

Ram Mohan is The Maker of Modern India and A Unitarian Journalist

Maker of Modern India

Raja Ram Mohan Roy was a great social reformer. His basic approach was to social reforms as for religion and culture. He opposed the barrier of caste system which was most prevalent in the society. He felt piety on this heinous social evil. He took more care on the divisive nature of the caste system and its harmful effect on the social and political life in India.

According to Raja Ram Mohan Roy, social and political problem were inter-linked. He believed that caste barrier was responsible for many social evils. It divided community and also stagnated the country’s development. He argued that if a Brahmin, however ill educated or immoral, would receive the respects of the people, but a Shudra would always remain in the bottom, although he was well educated, highly cultured and has a very good character.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy felt that India has been the foot stool of foreign invaders on account of the existence of the caste system. He wrote in his Brahmanical Magazine, “We have been subjected to such insults for about nine centuries and causes of such degradation has been over excess in civilization and abstinence from the slaughter even of animals, as well our division into caste, which has been the source of want of unity, among us”.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy always opposed caste system and never feared to argue against it. He wrote a tract in 1827, it contained the basic principles and arguments to the institution of caste system. He said that “a Brahmin was he who had the experience of God or had felt God at any moment of his life. A non-Brahmin could also be a Brahmin if experiences God”. According to, him the quality of man was resolved by his character and attainments.

He felt it very much that Indian progress was so slow because of the rigid caste system which kept man separate from man, sect from sect, province from province. He clearly saw that with a rigid caste system, national unity could not be achieved and political emancipation would always remain distant. Raja Ram Mohan Roy was fully against this vital evil and was the first man to destroy the roots of caste system. He wanted to form caste and creed and those ills of recent growth, which he wanted to counter by means of synthesis of the Eastern and Western Idealism.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy touched and influenced every aspect of human life. He worked hard and dedicated his whole life for betterment of the society and country also. Bengal was one of the provinces groaning under the curse of Sati, child marriage and polygamy. The system of polygamy was spread specially in the higher class of the society. Due to system of polygamy, position of women in the society was poor. Raja Ram Mohan Roy also faught incessantly against child marriages and for female education, attacked polygamy and advocated re¬marriage of widows.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy said in his own words, “The accusation of the want of virtues knowledge is an injustice, observe what pain, what slighting, what contempt and what afflictions their virtue enable them to support ! How many Kulin Brahmins are there who marry ten or fifteen wives for the sake of money that never see the greater number of them after the day of marriage, visit others only three or four times, in the course of their life.

Still amongst those women, most, even without seeing of receiving any support from their husbands, living dependent on their fathers or brothers, and suffering much distress, continue to preserve their virtue and when Brahmins or those of other tribes, bring their wives to live with them what misery do the women not suffer? At marriage the wife is recognized as half of her husband, but in after-conduct they are treated worse than inferior animals. For the woman is employed to do the work of a slave in the house, such as, in her turn, to clean the peace very early morning, whether cold or wet, to scour the dishes to wash the floor, to cook night and day, to prepare and serve food for her husband, father, mother in law, sister in law, brother in law and friends and relatives.

Where Brahmins and Kayasthas are not wealthy, their women are obliged to attend to their in laws and to prepare cowdung cakes to burn. In afternoons they fetch water from the river or tank and at night perform the duty of menial servants in making the beds. In case of any fault or omission in performing of those jobs they receive injuries treatment. Should the husband acquire wealth he indulges in criminal amours to her perfect knowledge, and almost under her eyes, and does not see her perhaps once in a month. As long as the husband is poor, she suffers every kind of trouble, and when he becomes rich, she is altogether heart-broken. All this pain and affection their virtue along enable them to support.”

Raja Ram Mohan Roy criticized bitterly the practice of evils of polygamy. According to him, “The consequences that a woman, who is looked up to as the sole mistress by the rest of the family, on day, on the next, becomes dependent on her sons and subject to the slights of her daughter in law”.

He had also encouraged intercast marriage. Caste system was prevalent in the entire society of Bengal. And also casteism was in its worst position.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy had much more regard of women. He always did better for the upliftment of women in the society. He totally criticized caste based marriage. He suggested that “Inter-caste marriage would remove the system of polygamy and other social evils. It could also stop selling of daughters and sisters by the Brahmins. He felt that by the introduction of intercast marriage the crusade of Sati would also be besotted”. He also supported the ‘Shiva marriage’ and said; “There is no discrimination of age and caste or race in Shiva marriage”. Raja Ram Mohan Roy also opposed the child marriage.

In the economic sphere Raja Ram Mohan Roy espoused the cause of the cultivators who, he felt, had been placed at the mercy of the Zamindars under the permanent settlement. He was the first to draw attention to the economic drain of India carried on systematically by the British rulers. He supported the setting up of industries by the English in Bengali countryside so that peasants groaning under the constant tyranny of the Zamindars could get employment.

He felt that socio-religions reforms would lead to the political advancement of India. The path he showed was the constitutional method that was initially followed half a century later by the India National Congress. He was the first in India to take note of world officers and took keen interest in international events. He championed the struggle for freedom and democratic rights like liberty, nationalism and free expression and was vehemently opposed to tyranny and injustice. More over he was the only person in his time in the whole world of man to realize the significance of modern age.

Nehru describes Roy as a “new type” of thinker “combining in himself the old learning and the new.” “Deeply versed,” wrote Nehru, “in Indian thought and philosophy, a scholar of Sanksrit, Persian and Arabic, he was a product of the mixed Hindu-Muslim culture” of that part of India.

To Frederick Max Muller “he was an unselfish, an honest and a bold man—a great man in the highest-sense of the word.”

Rabindranath Tagore described him as “the great path- maker of this century.

It is undouted that he was a great and noble son of India. There was perhaps hardly any field of activity which he did not touch upon in order to elevate the life of the people – religious, social, educational, literary and political aspects.

In several respect his work was that of a pioneer, though in certain others he was a continuer or reformer. Some of his ideas and activities might have been sponsored or suggested by individual predecessors. But what is really significant is that in that transitional age he, amongst our country men, endeavoured almost single handedly to renovate so many different facades of the life of people during a short span of mere fifteen years or so. In this sense he was not only a herald of new age but one of the architects of modern India.

A Unitarian Journalist

Ram Mohan Roy established the Unitarian Mission Press in 1824 in Calcutta. At this time, he came into conflict with the Christian Missionaries and published a series of pamphlets—The Precepts of Jesus’, ‘Appeal to the Christian Public’, The Ideal Humanity of Jesus’. He argued against the doctrine of Atonement. He also opposed the doctrine of Trinity. He said that Christ was not God and he did not claim himself equal with God. Jesus was a manifestation of God’s love and showed us that love was the way of life and happiness. These writings resulted great controversy with the Christian missionaries of Serampore.

Ram Mohan Roy published his Brahmanical magazine at this time and the Calcutta Unitarian Committee was formed by him in 1821 as protest against the Christian Missionaries. This did not get sufficient response from the public and soon Roy thought of establishing an institution in the light of Unitarianism and on August 20,1828, he founded the Brahmo Samaj which meant to be an assembly of all who believed in the unity of God and discarded the worship of idols.

Ram Mohan Roy was not against Christianity or Hinduism. He was only against the corrupt and degenerated forms of religions and customs. The establishment of Brahmo Sabha was the most important effort of Ram Mohan Roy for the practice of a purified religion, specially Hinduism. Although he lived for only four more years, the ideas and ideals of Brahmo Sabha became most influential institution of liberation, rationalism and modernity which revolutionised Indian thought.

Among the other measures advocated by him that may be mentioned are the Indianisation of the British-Indian army, trial by Jury, separation of the offices of judge and magistrate, codification of civil and criminal laws, consultation with the Indian leaders before enactment of new laws, and the substitution of English for Persian as the official language of the courts of law in India.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy was one of the earliest champions of the freedom of the press. Like Milton and other scholars who fought for freedom of press, Roy championed the concept of freedom of written expression. Along with Dwarakanath Tagore, Harchandra Gosh, Gouri Charan Banerjee, Ram Mohan Roy had written a petition in 1823, addressed to the Supreme Court, for the freedom of the press.

He strongly believed that not only would the freedom of press provide a device for ventilation of grievances it would also enable the government to adopt steps for their redressal before they caused damage to the administration.

Roy also felt that the uncritical acceptance of British liberal values was probably the best possible means of creating democratic institutions in India. He appreciated the British rule as ‘a boon in disguise’ because it would eventually transplant democratised governance in India.

In the early 1820s, Roy assisted the Baptists at Serampore in their work of Bible translation. He worked closely with several missionaries, including a missionary from Scotland, William Adam (1796-1881), who had arrived in India in 1818 and had studied Bengali and Sanskrit in order to join the translation team. He was already making common cause with them in their campaign against Sati, since his own sister-in-law committed Sati in 1812. From this period, Roy also championed gender-equality.

In 1920, Roy published his book on Jesus, The Precepts of Jesus. He depicted Jesus as a great teacher of ethics, whose will was in harmony with the will of God. However, he denied Jesus’ divinity, just as he denied the existence of avatars or human manifestation of the divine in Hinduism. He also extracted miracles from the gospels, since these contravened reason.

In 1822, William Adam, with financial help from Roy and later from Unitarian in the United States and Britain, formed the Calcutta Unitarian Society. Roy also funded the Society’s printing press. However, although he identified Unitarianism as closer to the ethical-monotheism he espoused, he wanted to ground his religious ideas in the cultural context of India. Roy corresponded with some eminent Unitarians in this period.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy is A Great Reformer

The Biography of Famous Personalities of India will tell you about the controversies, the dark sides of a person that you may have never heard of.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy is A Great Reformer

A Great Reformer

Fondly called the ‘Maker of Modern India’, Religious, Social and Educational reformer Raja Ram Mohan Roy was a visionary who lived during one of India’s darkest social phases but strived hard to make India a better place for the future generations to come.

Religious Reforms

Religious reforms introduced by him have helped India to attain freedom of expression in many ways. In the initial days, his differences with his father regarding the concept of idol- worship took a serious turn. He was a man who thought-free. In the Upanishads and Vedas, there are writings on freedom of thought. Ram Mohan admired this spirit of freedom. He proclaimed that simple living and high thinking should be a man’s motto in life. And he lived accordingly. Ram Mohan always believed that God does not reside in any idol and vehemently opposed idol worship.

After finishing his studies Ram Mohan Roy worked for British East India Company at many places in Bengal, before finally settling in Calcutta in 1815. He had already published several books by then. First among his books were written in Persian language with the preface written in Arabic. It was a direct attack on idol worship.

After he moved to Calcutta, Ram Mohan Roy became very much involved in social and literary works. He, even translated the Upanishads written in Sanskrit language into Bengali language. He also published several works in English condemning the Sati, and also indulged in debates with traditional scholars on the rights of Hindu women.

He also contested the assertions of Christian missionaries that their religion was better to all others. He, in the year 1815, founded the Atmiya Sabha or Friendship Association, as it is also known as, among other things, he went in search for elements common to various religious traditions.

By this time, Ram Mohan Roy himself came to believe in the concept of omnipresence of God, who is the only proper object of religious veneration, is one and undivided in person. He also stated that this was the very message of Vedic literature and of the Bible and Holy Quran as well. He started to promote messages about inter-religious understandings and in the process wrote a book on precepts of Jesus Christ and began to work on life of Prophet Muhammad.

While he was involved in the process of revolution, he was soundly abused by traditional Hindus, who derided them as sinful atheists and moderns blinded by passions. He was not supported by the British as well. They criticized that he resisted conversion and that his high regard for Jesus did not expand to acknowledging his religion.

Roy in the year 1816 opened a school for boys, whose medium of instruction was English. In 1821 he started a weekly newspaper in Bengali language (first of its kind in any Indian language). Thereafter he started a paper in Persian as well (of which, as with its Bengali predecessor, he wrote all the contents). He founded the Brahmo Samaj (the Society of God), 1828 which sermonized the love and worship of the One God on the basis of what its creator claimed were the innovative wisdom of Vedas.

There were, however, some Christian priests who were happy at Roy’s enthusiasm and interest for doctrines of Christianity. They even suggested that he should convert to Christianity. These priests could not understand the mind of Ram Mohan Roy who was staunch believer of Hinduism. He had immense admiration and respect for Vedas and Upanishads in Hinduism religion, which he had studied deeply.

Some men spoke lightly of the Vedas and the Upanishads. Ram Mohan Roy gave them a very clear answer:

“There is only one God in the universe. He has no form and qualities which men can describe. He is full of joy. Every living being has an element of God. These noble ideas sparkle in the Upanishads. Moreover, these books support people to reflect for themselves, they strike out original paths. They do not chain man’s intelligence.”

Just as he damned the dreadful customs of the Hindus he condemned the superstitions of the followers of other religions also.

Ram Mohan Roy’s career as an active religious reformer began only after he had settled permanently in Calcutta in his mid-thirties, though the ‘Tuhfat-ul-Muwahhiddin’ was written in 1804. The year 1815 is the most remarkable period in his life. His many sided attack against prevailing practices was launched at this period as by this time, he had studied the ancient classical literature of Sanskrit and Arabic and became acquainted with new forces that were emerging in the West.

Roy established the ‘Atmiya Sabha’ in which verses from the Upanishads were discussed and hymns composed by him and his friends were sung. They held debate on subjects like Sati, idol worship and polygamy related to kulinism. He had to use his powerful pen to make the people realise about the faults and weak points of old customs and prevailing practices. He wanted to take the knowledge of scriptures to the masses so that they could come to know that the teachings of the sacred books were very different from what were practiced by the people.

Between 1815 and 1819, Roy translated the original works of the Vedanta and the Upanishads in Bengali. A Bengali translation of the Vedantasutra of Badarayana according to Sankara’s commentary was published in 1815. The Vedantasara in Bengali, the abridgment of Vedanta in English and Bengali and the English translation of Kena Upanishad were published in 1817. He wrote against idolatry and priesthood and in favour of monotheism. At that same time, he started publishing a Bengali weekly ‘Sambad Kaumudi’ which was followed in 1822 by a Persian weekly—the ’Mirat-ul-Akbar’.

In Sambad Kaumudi Ram Mohan Roy wrote tracts in Bengali and also translated them in English in order to make the people understand that the practice of ‘Sati’ was not sanctioned by the Shastras. Lord William Bentinck, with the help of Ram Mohan Roy declared the rite of Sati as ‘illegal and punishable by the Criminal Courts’ in India by Regulation XVII on 4th December, 1829.

Educational Reforms

Further to religion and Sati practice, Ram Mohan Roy’s attention was caught by education. He laid stress on education as instrument for the liberation of man from all kinds of evils and degenerating influence in life. He was a pioneer of modern education in India. Himself a great scholar of Sanskrit, Arabic, Persian and English, he advocated the learnings of Western knowledge and science. He founded the first English School ‘Anglo-Indian (Hindu) School’ in Calcutta in 1822. He was also behind the setting up of Hindu College in the same year. He established the Vedanta college for inculcating the principle of monotheism of Vedanta along with Western science and philosophy.

Educational reforms of Ram Mohan Roy improved the learning system in the country. The socio-economic and the political condition of the 19th century India made the learning and education necessary in India. The learning of English and Western education became indispensable. However, the historians have opined that primarily the economic factor was responsible for the introduction of the English language and the western literature. In British India, a system of education was necessary which could help to earn livelihood. Due to these circumstances, the aspects of education became wider in India.

The Western education in India spread mainly due to the efforts of the progressive Indian elements that promoted the social reforms. Social reforms of Ram Mohan Roy not only liberated India from the shackles of superstitions but also introduced a new system of education in India. Ram Mohan Roy believed education to be an implement for social reform. He protested against the government’s policy to strengthen the Sanskrit Colleges in the Presidency Towns of Kolkata, Varanasi and Chennai and urged for the establishment of more oriental colleges.

He wrote to Lord Amherst that education of Sanskrit language and Sanskrit literature would do nothing and had no practical use. Rather he requested him to promote the Western education in India. He felt that the youths could not adapt themselves according to the changing societies if they cling to the age-old Vedantic philosophy or doctrines. Ram Mohan Roy was the chief advocate of the modern process of education and the scientific learning. The improvement of native people was the chief motive of Ram Mohan Roy.

Therefore, he helped the British government to promote a more liberal and enlightened system in learning. In the new system of education he introduced the subjects of practical use like Mathematics, Natural Philosophy, Chemistry, and Anatomy with other useful sciences. The protests of Ram Mohan Roy found expression when the Government was agreed to encourage the study of English as well as the other oriental languages.

A grant was sanctioned for the Calcutta Hindu College, which was set up in the year 1817 by the enlightened Bengalis. The Hindu College was set up with the intention of imparting education in English. The system of education of the Hindu College also emphasized the study of Western Humanities and the Sciences.

Ram Mohan Roy formed an association of English and Hindu scholars. He started a college also and arranged for the teaching of modern subjects like English, Science, Mathematics, and Political Science. Not only had the introduction of Western education, Ram Mohan Roy also promoted the growth and prosperity of the women education. He strongly believed that unless the womenfolk were educated, the society would not be liberated from the evils. Thus Raja Ram Mohan Roy promoted the Western education, and India during that time witnessed a great progress in the field of education.

Social Reforms

Social Reforms by Raja Ram Mohan Roy have helped India to come out of the jinx of social taboo and malpractices. He was brought up in a wealthy family, and was witness to all the aspects of Brahmin culture that was prevalent in Bengal during that time. Moderately prosperous landowners, Ram Mohan’s ancestors had served for several generations as revenue officials under the Mughals. Ram Mohan Roy was married twice before he entered his teens, this being customary among high-caste families, among whom child marriage and polygamy were both very common.

When the practice of sati was legally abolished in 1829, the credit for its abolition was given to the Governor General, Lord William Bentinck. However, as a contemporary English observer, herself a woman, pointed out—the legislation could not have been brought about but for the powerful though unacknowledged aid of the great Hindu philosopher Ram Mohan Roy. Roy’s great contribution towards this reform was to demonstrate that sati was not a religious duty sanctioned or upheld by Hindu scriptural tradition.

Through the 1820s, Roy’s ideas were being propagated through his Bengali newspaper, which was called the Sambad Kaumudi, or the ’Moon of Intelligence’.

In December 1921, the Calcutta Journal, a periodical of (and for) the English in India, wrote of Roy’s newspaper that ’she will be the means of the moral and intellectual renovation of India’. Nine years later, a London magazine described the Sambad Kaumudi as ‘the Morning Chronicle of India, advocating freedom, civil and religious, opposed to corruption and tyranny, and labouring, we are happy to say effectively and extensively, to eradicate the idolatrous rites of the Brahmins, and awaken the Hindus to a sense of the degradation and misery into which they have been plunged’.

In 1830 Ram Mohan Roy was sent by the then much- weakened Mughal emperor to England, to petition the King to increase his allowance and perquisites. Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s visit to England made a lot of difference in the social structure of India. There he met with officials of the East India Company, lobbied with members of Parliament, was granted an audience with the King and wrote and published books on Indian economics and law.

He exchanged views with British Utilitarians and English Socialists and also travelled to Paris. His biographer Sophia Dobson Collet remarks that ‘as he had interpreted England to India, so now he interpreted India to England’. In London, he watched with interest from the sidelines as Parliament passed the Reform Bill of 1831, which extended the franchise to a greater number of British men.

Success at England and Untimely Death of Ram Mohan Roy

The Biography of Famous Personalities of India will tell you about the controversies, the dark sides of a person that you may have never heard of.

Success at England and Untimely Death of Ram Mohan Roy

Success at England

The time when Raja Ram Mohan Roy reached England the political life of the country was in a state of convulsion due, to the Reform Bill agitation. The first Bill was introduced in 1831 but was defeated. The second Bill introduced the same year was also defeated in the House of Lords. But finally the third Reform Bill was again placed before the House of Commons and passed by it in March 1832, and was then sent to the House of Lords.

The people of England were greatly agitated and awaited the decision of the Lords in a wild fever of excitement. This ‘ time the Lords yielded to the popular pressure and the Reform Bill was passed in June 1832. Similar measures were enacted * for Ireland and Scotland also. Raja Ram Mohan Roy was greatly delighted with the passing of the Reform Bill in England.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy had a great admiration for France, the land which had given the inspiring call for liberty, fraternity, and equality, and which in his own words was ‘so richly adorned by the cultivation of the arts and sciences, and above all, blessed by the possession of a free constitution’. His name was well-known in the cultured circles of France, as some of his writings had already reached the shores of France as early as 1818.

In 1818 when Raja Ram Mohan Roy was in France, he became famous through the writings of Bishop of Blois.

Bishop wrote :
“The moderation with which he repels the attacks on his writings, the force of his arguments, and his profound knowledge of the sacred books of the Hindus, are proofs of his fitness for the work he has undertaken; and the pecuniary sacrifices he has made show disinterestedness which cannot be encouraged or admired too warmly.”

Raja Ram Mohan Roy had an audience with the King of France on 14 October 1832. In 1832, an article by Monsieur Pauthier in Paris elaborated various aspects of Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s works.

In course of time the British government recognized the right of Raja Ram Mohan Roy to represent the emperor of Delhi as his special emissary and also recognized the title of ‘Raja’ conferred on him by the latter. At a levee held at the St James Palace Raja Ram Mohan Roy was granted an audience by King William IV on 7 September, 1831 and was later invited by the King to a banquet on the occasion of the opening of the London Bridge. The occasion was also graced by men of eminence such as Jeremy Bentham, and many others.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy replied to these felicitations in a speech which ended with these memorable words :

“There is a battle going on between Reason and Scriptures, common sense and wealth, power and prejudice. These three . have been struggling with the other three; but I am convinced that your success sooner or later is certain. Honour, that you have from time to time conferred on me, I shall never forget to the last moment of my existence.”

As the allowances of the Indian Emperor were ultimately not settled, it was then decided that he would be given rupees three lakhs annually. Roy’s efforts to abolish the Sati were also very successful. So when the bill was finally passed in the Parliament, happiness of Raja Ram Mohan Roy knew no bounds.

Untimely Death

Pecuniary anxieties and the strain of overwork had wrought havoc with the otherwise superb constitution of Raja Ram Mohan Roy. After a point of time he fell ill and became bed-ridden. There were some who respected and loved him, actually took care of him during his bad days, like relatives. Doctors with great reputation treated him but his health did not improve.

He was persuaded by his friends to leave London and go to Bristol in early September, 1833, for change and rest in the house of Miss Castle who was a ward of his friend, Dr. Lant Carpenter, Pastor of Bristol’s Lewin’s Mead Chapel.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy was greatly relieved in the company of this friend, but on 19 September, he suddenly fell ill with meningitis. He had high fever with severe headache. In the following days his condition worsened. Miss Hare, a sister of David Hare, nursed him during his illness. A number of eminent physicians attended on him, but all to no avail. His condition deteriorated rapidly. On the 27 September 1833, Raja Ram Mohan Roy passed away there only. He was buried at the Arnos Vale Cemetery in Bristol.
Success at England and Untimely Death of Ram Mohan Roy 1
‘His utterance of the sacred “AUM”—one of the last words he was heard to utter—suggested that the solitary gate of death as well as in the crowded thoroughfare of life, the contemplation of Deity was the chief pre-occupation of his soul.’

Many years after, in 1842, when Dwarkanath Tagore, the friend and disciple of Raja Ram Mohan Roy, was in England, he had the coffin removed from Stapieton Grove to Arno’s Vale, the cemetery on the outskirts of Bristol where on 29 May, 1843, Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s mortal remains were interred and, in 1844, a beautiful structure in Indian style was erected over it.

There is also a blue plaque commemorating him on his house in Bedford Square, London.

In September 2006 representatives from the Indian High Commission visited Bristol to mark the anniversary of Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s death, during the ceremony Hindu, Muslim and Sikh women sang Sanskrit prayers of thanks.

Following on from this visit the Mayor of Kolkata, Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, who was-amongst the representatives from the India High Commission, decided to raise funds to restore the tomb which was in need of restoration and repair.

In June 2007 businessman Aditya Poddar donated ₹ 50,000 towards the restoration of his grave after being approached by the Mayor of Kolkata for funding.

The epitaph on the late nineteenth century stone at the tomb reads:
“Beneath this stone rest the remains of Raja Ram Mohan Roy Bahadur, a conscientious and steadfast believer in the unity of Godhead, he consecrated his life with entire devotion to the worship of the Divine Spirit alone.”

“To great natural talents, he united through mastery of many languages and distinguished himself as one of the greatest scholars of his day. His unwearied labour to promote the social, moral and physical condition of the people of India, his earnest endeavours to suppress idolatry and the rite of Sati and his constant zealous advocacy of whatever tended to advance the glory of God and the welfare of man live in the grateful remembrance of his countrymen.”

Success at England and Untimely Death of Ram Mohan Roy 2
Raja Ram Mohan Roy was a major shaper of modern India. Consciously influenced by Christianity and by the social agenda of many missionaries as much if not more than by their religious ideas, he was convinced that India’s culture and religious tradition was rational and of profound spiritual value.

While he remained rooted in Hinduism, Roy admired much of what he saw in Islam, Christianity and in other religions which he studied, and believed that the same fundamental truths inform all of them. He held that the first principle of all religions is the “Absolute Originator.”
Success at England and Untimely Death of Ram Mohan Roy 3

Against the criticism that it contained very little of lasting worth, he set out to retrieve from India’s heritage what could withstand the scrutiny of a rational mind. He went further than others in what he was prepared to abandon, which for him included the Vedas. For other reformers, such as Dayananda Saraswati, the Vedas contained all religious truth as well as ancient scientific knowledge, and were not to be thrown away.

The organization he founded, the Brahmo Samaj, was a pioneer of social reform, an important promoter of education and of India’s autonomy and eventual independence. Its basic ideals, including gender-equality and its rejection of class- based privilege, have become part of the social framework of Indian society, at least in theory.

It is around two hundred years since Raja Ram Mohan Roy died. But his memory is still green in the minds of Indians. He was an intellectual who tried to lead India to modernity. He taught the Hindus to give up meaningless beliefs and customs. He was the lamp that led Hindus to the essence of origin of Hinduism. His memory itself guides us to a noble life.

Abolition of Sati and England Visit of Ram Mohan Roy

The Biography of Famous Personalities of India will tell you about the controversies, the dark sides of a person that you may have never heard of.

Abolition of Sati and England Visit of Ram Mohan Roy

Abolition of Sati

Ram Mohan Roy played a major role towards abolition of sati system. When Ram Mohan’s brother—Jagmohan Roy died, his wife Alakamanjari had to observe ‘Sahagamana’ (that is, she was to be burnt alive with the dead body). All arrangements were made for cremation. Ram Mohan objected and begged his sister-in-law not to observe “Sati”. All people were against Ram Mohan Roy, A and Alakamanjari was forced to the funeral pyre with the corpse. The pyre was set on fire.
Abolition of Sati and England Visit of Ram Mohan Roy 1
This scene touched Ram Mohan Roy and thus instigated him to fight again? the system of Sati. Many people opposed Roy, but he did not flinch. Even the people of the West, who saw all this wondered, when even the government was afraid to interfere in this matter, Ram Mohan Roy risked his life and fought against this evil practice. In the end, he won and the government made ‘Sati’ ritual a crime. Along with the fight against Sati, Ram Mohan Roy started a strong movement in favour of women education and women’s right to property. He showed that woman enjoyed equal freedom with man according to Hinduism.

Ram Mohan Roy submitted a petition to the governor general in 1818 to stop this inhuman practice. And he appealed to the British government to treat Sati as murders and urged the punishment for compelling widows to burn themselves. He requested the government to stop it.

He argued : “Those who have no reliance on the Shastras and those who take delight in the self-destruction of women may well wonder that we should oppose that suicide which is forbidden by all Shastras and by every race of man”.

He also organized vigilance committees to keep a check on people who encouraged widows to commit Sati and himself tried to persuade the relatives of widows to give up their plan of self immolation. In this way he created an atmosphere and aroused enlightened public opinion for the abolition of the barbarous practice.

Ultimately Lord William Bentinck, the Governor-General, declared ‘Sati’ as illegal and punishable by court on 4th December 1829. The law provided that persons who were even associated in any way with the commission of Sati to be regarded as criminals.

When the orthodox Hindus protested and sent a petition to the British authorities in England against abolition, Raja Ram Mohan Roy submitted a counter petition approving of measure and appealing for its approval, and new regulation was approved. He was also present in England when case was taken up by the Privy council in 1832.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy gave before the people a correct interpretation of the Hindu scriptures. He was also the best admirer of community development. He always tried to do the best for the upliftment of this community. He emphasized more on women’s Education and worked for their progress. He also took care on the right of women to the property of her father.

It was the custom especially in Bengal that if a man died, his widow if she had borne sons, was not entailed to any share. Raja Ram Mohan Roy made a humble appeal for the defence of women’s right.

England Visit

Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s visit to England was crucial in the perspective of breaking the taboo in the then Indian society. There was a time when an Indian going to the foreign lands was considered wrong, and there was religious connotation as well. Those days, it was considered a sin and irreligious for a Hindu to cross the sea.

It was Raja Ram Mohan Roy who actually rejected this very idea and went to England. The British government granted the allowances to Akbar the Second, the Mughal King of Delhi. But it was really a very small amount. The King Akbar-II decided to send Ram Mohan Roy to England at his own expense to submit a representation to the King of England to increase the same. Before Roy left for England, the King conferred him to the title of “Raja”. Thus Ram Mohan Roy was called Raja Ram Mohan Roy thereafter.

Another crucial reason for Raja Ram Mohan Roy to visit England was to plead before the British parliament for the complete abolition of ’Sati’ in India.

There were many people, during that time, who objected vehemently to the visit of Ram Mohan Roy to England. There were people from the British government who also strongly opposed him visiting England. But by that time, he was very popular and his fame had already reached England.

On 15 November, 1830, Raja Ram Mohan Roy sailed for England by the steamer Albion, arriving there on 8 April, 1831. However, his fame had preceded him. In 1816 when his first English work on the Vedanta, An Abridgment of the Vedant, came out, it was reviewed at length by the Monthly Repository of Theology and General Literature of England. When his arrival in Liverpool was made known, almost all the celebrities of the town called on him.

William Roscoe, the famous historian of the Medcis, who was seriously ill at that time, sent his son requesting Raja Ram Mohan Roy to visit him. Raja Ram Mohan Roy visited Roscoe in his sick-room and both of them held a most intimate and warm conversation. Roscoe’s son, who was present during this interview, has left a memorable account of it:

“The interview will never be forgotten … after his usual gesture of Eastern salutation, Raja Ram Mohan Roy said, “Happy and proud am I, proud and happy to behold a man whose fame has extended not only over Europe but over every part of the world.” “I bless God”, replied Roscoe, “that I have been permitted to live to see this day.” Roscoe who was in a state of paralysis for years, died soon after.

The object of Raja Ram Mohan Roy’s visit to England was threefold. First, he wanted to submit a memorandum to the king of Great Britain on behalf of Akbar the Second the then Emperor of Delhi. Secondly, to present a memorial to the House of Commons for the abolition of Sati, and thirdly, to be present in England during the approaching discussion in the House of Commons on ‘the Renewal of the East India Company’s Charter.

From Liverpool Raja Ram Mohan Roy went to London without any delay so that he might be present in the House of Commons at the second reading of the Reform Bill. He reached London late in the evening and being tired he had turned in. When he was in London Jeremy Bentham the great British philosopher, called on him at a Hotel. Finding that Raja Ram Mohan Roy had already retired, Bentham left a note for him :

‘Jeremy Bentham to his friend, Raja Ram Mohan Roy’. Bentham admired Raja Ram Mohan Roy so deeply that on another occasion he left a note addressing Raja Ram Mohan Roy as his “intensely-admired and dearly-beloved collaborator in the service of mankind”.

In London, Raja Ram Mohan Roy was busily engaged meeting the distinguished men of England and holding political discussion with them. The Duke of Cumberland, the brother of the King of England, introduced him to the House of Lords. And as per James Sutherland ‘it was the Raja’s urgent solicitations which prevented the Tory Peers voting against the Indian Jury Bill.’

Raja Ram Mohan Roy developed an intimate friendship with Lord Brougham, the champion of the abolition of slavery and the great upholder of popular education. The Directors of the East India Company entertained Raja Ram Mohan Roy on 6 July, 1831, at a dinner at the city of London tavern. The Chairman of the East India Company presided and proposed the health of Raja Ram Mohan Roy, complimenting him for the vast services he had rendered to the Indian community.

Raja Ram Mohan Roy was assigned a seat at the coronation of William IV among the ambassadors of the crowned heads of Europe. The royal Asiatic society of London invited him to take part in its annual meeting where Raja Ram Mohan Roy proposed a vote of thanks to Henry Thomas Colebrooke, the great Orientalist. Raja Ram Mohan Roy also met Robert Owen, the humanitarian socialist, who tried his best to win over him to his point of view.