Allegory of the Cave Summary

What is the main theme of Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” in the Republic?

The main theme of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave in the Republic is that human perception cannot derive true knowledge, and instead, real knowledge can only come via philosophical reasoning.

In Plato’s example, prisoners live their entire lives in a cave, only able to see shadows. To them, these shadows are reality. When a prisoner randomly guesses the next shadow to appear, that prisoner will be worshipped as having mastered nature. When one prisoner escapes and understands that life comes from the sun, he realizes his former view of reality based on human perception was wrong. When he returns to tell the other prisoners, they do not believe him, because they are still relying on their perception.

This idea also begins to uncover other issues with human perception. Humans are biased individuals who will explicitly or implicitly apply individual biases to what they perceive. Additionally, two humans can perceive the same object and derive a different meaning from it. For example, a rainstorm can be viewed as a blessing by a farmer or a curse by a sailor.

Ultimately, Plato’s point is that in order to truly gain an understanding of knowledge, humans must submit to the idea of specific and fair philosophical reasoning, which transcends the pitfalls of human perception.

The Allegory of the Cave represents an expression of Plato’s philosophy of truth and reality (which can be termed as Platonic Idealism). When reading Plato’s various dialogues, one will often observe a focus upon themes such as justice, virtue, beauty, and the good. For Plato, these various concepts are not human inventions, but are actually built into reality itself, as part of a more transcendent reality (one that is actually more real, in a Platonic sense, than the material world as it is experienced by human beings).

The Allegory of the Cave serves to illustrate this relationship in more concrete terms, with the prisoners serving as a representation of human existence. Just as the prisoners are ultimately trapped in their cave, watching shadows on the wall, so too are human beings trapped by their material existence (with all of our knowledge and assumptions of the world being much like those shadows). Yet truth still exists. Even as the prisoners remain trapped in the cave, there is still the world outside the cave. This represents the reality of transcendent ideals which Plato speaks about.

Thus, this entire allegory sketches the Platonic vision of reality, in which human beings are only able to indirectly grasp the higher, transcendent reality which emanates through the universe.

The answer above offers a fine description and explanation of Plato’s allegory of the cave. To expand on it a bit, the theme of the cave allegory gets to the heart of the divide between science and philosophy in Western culture. Plato says we on earth live in a cave, watching shadows on a wall. What we think is real—the natural world—is a pale and imperfect reflection of an ideal reality. He wants us to understand this so that we realize that philosophy is superior to science.

For example, we may think the table in front of us is a real table, worthy of study, and not merely an imperfect imitation of an ideal table. However, we can use the following thought experiment to show that any table we try to build in this world, no matter how perfect we try to make it, is just a shadow of the ideal table. Say we decide to build our table to 1/16″ accuracy. That is crude and imperfect: we could always build it to 1/32″ accuracy. But that too is crude and imperfect: why not build to 1/64″ accuracy? Or for that matter, why not build to 1/100,000″ accuracy? But no matter how accurate our measurements, we could always make the table more accurate: hence it will never, in this world, be the ideal table.

Therefore, according to the allegory of the cave, studying the natural world (science) is less worthy than studying philosophy because a scientist is always studying a shadow, an imperfect imitation of the ideal. The only way to truly contemplate reality is to go inward, to use the human mind to imagine the ideal, which is the province of philosophy.