In the Kingdom of Fools Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In the Kingdom of Fools Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In this page you can find In the Kingdom of Fools Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments, Extra Questions for Class 9 English will make your practice complete.

In the Kingdom of Fools Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In the Kingdom of Fools Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
What was the routine of the people in the kingdom of fools?
Answer:
In the kingdom of fools, the people used to work at night and sleep during the sunlight. There the day was considered to be the night and the night was considered to be the day. This routine was followed not only by human beings but animals too.

In the Kingdom of Fools Extra Questions and Answers

Question 2.
What advice did the guru give to his disciple?
Answer:
The guru advised his disciple to leave the kingdom of fools as soon as possible. He said that one could never anticipate the next move of the fools. The guru was a wise man. He was right in his predictions.

In the Kingdom of Fools Short Answer Type Questions and Answers

Question 3.
Why did the disciple become fat?
Answer:
The disciple was a food freak. He found the food very cheap in the kingdom. He ate his fill every day and grew fat like a street side bull. The cost of everything was only one duddu. He could buy any thing for one rupee.

Question 4.
How did the thief die?
Answer:
The thief died while carrying out his loot from the house of a rich merchant. The wall of the old house collapsed on him and killed him on the spot. It was an accident but his brother complained to the king against the owner of the house for making a weak wall.

Question 5.
What was the trial about?
Answer:
The trial was about the death of a thief who died while coming out of a house. The wall of the house was very old and collapsed on him. The king wanted to fix the responsibility on a person responsible for his death.

Question 6.
Why did the king want to punish the merchant?
Answer:
The king wanted to punish the rich merchant because the wall of his house had fallen on the thief. The king blamed him for building a weak wall.

Question 7.
How did the merchant defend himself?
Answer:
The merchant defended himself by submitting that he had not built the wall. The wall was built by a mason during the time of his father. He argued that the mason who built the wall should be held responsible for the death of the thief.

Question 8.
What was the dancing girl blamed for?
Answer:
The dancing girl was blamed for distracting the mason who built the wall. The mason built the bad wall which fell on the thief who died there and then. She was held responsible for the death of the thief.

Question 9.
How did the dancing girl defend herself?
Answer:
The dancing girl defended herself by saying that a goldsmith made her walk up and down by delaying work on her jewellery. She told the king that the goldsmith made many excuses. Her movement might have distracted the bricklayer. So it was not her fault.

Question 10.
Why was the merchant not executed after he was finally found guilty?
Answer:
The merchant was finally found guilty of killing the thief. He was ordered to be executed. But he was too thin to fit the newly made stake. So the king ordered to find someone who could fit the stake.

Question 11.
What did the guru tell the king about the stake?
Answer:
The guru told the king that the stake was the stake of God of justice. Whoever died first would be reborn as the king of that country. And whoever died next, would be the minister.

Question 12.
How did the guru and his disciple become the king and the minister of the kingdom of fools ?
Answer:
After the death of the king and his minister, the people found guru and his disciple. They were impressed with their intellectual capacity and wisdom. They made them king and minister
respectively.

Question 13.
According to you, who was a fool in the kingdom, the king or the public. Why?
Answer:
In my opinion, both the kingand the public were fools in the kingdom. When the king and his minister decided to change the system, the public should have opposed and changed them. But the public also acted foolishly.

Question 14.
“The disciple did not obey his guru.” Do you think his obedience would have saved him from trouble?
Answer:
The disciple did not obey his guru. He was in trouble. If he had followed his guru and left the kingdom he would not have been in trouble. He was greedy and decided to remain in the kingdom because everything was so cheap there. He used to eat to his fill and became fat.

In the Kingdom of Fools Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
What did the guru and the disciple find in the city of fools? Would you advise anybody to live in such a place?
Answer:
When the guru and his disciple arrived in the city, they found it beautiful. It was broad daylight. Everyone was asleep. Even the animals, like cows, were asleep. They wandered around the town and found it deserted. The shops were closed and nothing could be seen outside. As soon as the sun set, the whole city woke up.

Being hungry, they went to buy some eatables from a shop. They were surprised to find that everything cost the same, a single ‘duddu’. Both of them were delighted to find such a cheap city. No, I would never advise anybody to live in such a place as it seems ‘tempting but in fact may pose problems anytime in the life. One should think twice before making any hasty decision.’

Question 2.
Why, according to you, is it always risky to live among fools? Elaborate your answer with reference to the story ‘In the Kingdom of Fools.’
Answer:
One never knows what a fool has in his mind. So. it is always risky to live among fools. The guru in the story tells his disciple, “The king and the minister are all fools. They won’t last very long, and you can’t tell what they’ll do to you next.” Their behaviour is not predictable. The disciple did not follow the advice of his guru and was in trouble. He remembered Guru’s words when he was arrested by the men of the king to execute merely because he fitted the stake. The king, the most foolish creature of the kingdom, had a unique way of judgement. He did not apply his mind when deciding cases. He became victim of his own foolishness and died.

Question 3.
One should not be greedy. How did greed bring the disciple in trouble?
Answer:
It is true that one should not be greedy. The disciple was a food freak. He did not listen to his Guru’s advice. He decided to stay in the kingdom of fools. He found the food very cheap and ate his fill every day and grew fat like a street side bull. He became so greedy that he disobeyed his guru.

It was his greed for food that put him in trouble. He became the victim of the foolishness of the king. He was arrested and sentenced to death. The King wanted someone to be executed for a crime which was not committed at all. The disciple fit his requirement. So he was in trouble. If he had not been greedy, he would have left the kingdom like his guru. But his greed for food put him in trouble.

Question 4.
In the lesson, ‘In the Kingdom of Fools’, the king is the kingpin of troubles that beset his kingdom. Cite examples from the lesson to draw up a pen picture of the king.
Answer:
The King of the Kingdom of Fools, by his actions really lives up to the name of his kingdom. He is a despotic ruler who has changed the working routine of his subjects by ordering them to sleep by day and work by night. He lacks financial acumen and has ordered a common price tag for all goods in the kingdom. The king lacks far-sightedness and cannot visualize what the repercussions of his current actions will be, in the future.

Thus he orders a stake to be made that does not fit the proportions of the convicted criminal. With no understanding of legalities, he metes out justice according to hearsay. He blindly follows advice and thus gets entrapped in the rationale posed by the guru and his disciple who persuade him to hang on the stake to ensure he becomes a king in the next life.

Question 5.
In the story ‘In the Kingdom of Fools’, the Guru who had visited the kingdom, managed to rescue the kingdom through his ways. What character qualities in him proved to be ideal for this task?
Answer:
The Guru’s keen observational skills made him quickly assess that it was a kingdom of fools, when he saw the entire city asleep in broad daylight. The Guru was an ideal disciplinarian. When his obstinate disciple refused to listen to reason and insisted on enjoying the comforts the kingdom provided, the astute guru abandoned him. The Guru was an innovative man and devised a clever way of rescuing his disciple from death at the stake.

He informed the gullible king that the man dying first at the stake would be reborn as king. Being a fine strategist he clevesly had himself imprisoned to be hung, pretending to covet the throne in his next life. The foolish ruler schemed to exchange places in prison and thus died at the stake. The guru lived a disciplined and orderly way of life so when he was made the ruler, he restored the kingdom to normalcy.

Question 6.
A disciple is blessed when he finds the ideal Guru. In the case of the disciple in the story ‘In the Kingdom of Fools’, despite having an ideal guru, the disciple had drifted away from him. What traits in his character had made him behave in this manner?
Answer:
The disciple being shortsighted, did not realize the temporary nature of the abundance that he saw all around in the kingdom and felt that the good times would last forever. He liked immediate gratification and thus, when his guru tried to make him realize that the good times were limited and that they should leave the kingdom before it fell into ruin, the obstinate disciple preferred not to sacrifice the comforts the kingdom provided.

The disciple was easily won over. Thus he was easily persuaded to become the minister, of the kingdom, unlike his guru. Being a glutton, all he wanted in life was good, cheap food. He fattened on ghee, bananas, rice and wheat, by eating his fill. Finally, he was quick to reform. Thus when he was condemned to die at the stake, he did not appeal for mercy but prayed to his guru for help.

Question 7.
The disciple was in trouble because he was greedy. The king and his minister also met their end because of greed. Elaborate.
Answer:
Greed is a vice. A greedy person can never be happy. In the story ‘In the Kingdom of Fools’ all the three persons suffered because of their greed. The disciple suffered for his greed for food. He found the food very cheap and decided to stay in the kingdom of fools. He disobeyed his guru who had advised him to leave the country. , Not only the disciple but the king and his minister were also greedy and became the vicitim.

Both the King and his minister wanted to grab the power and luxury in their next birth. They wanted to reborn as the king and the minister. The Guru knew their weakness. Greed was their weakness. He used their weakness to saw his disciple. The Guru told the King that the stake was the stake of God of Justice. Whoever died first would be reborn as the King of that country and whoever died next, would be the minister. Both were trapped in greed and, as a result, died.

Question 8.
“My mind was not on it,” said the bricklayer. Was this a good excuse for not building the wall
properly? What will happen if we do something, without our mind in it? What can we learn from this situation? Explain.
Answer:
The bricklayer defended that while building the wall, his mind was not on it due to a beautiful dancing girl who was going up and down the street all day with her anklets jingling. So the wall was weak and got collapsed. However, it was a lame excuse for not building the wall properly. There was no answer for his blunder.

So, if we do anything carelessly and without concentration mishap is sure to occur. We shall be held responsible for its consequences. In the story, the wall of the old house collapsed and the thief was killed on the spot. So, in the context of the situation we learn that we should do our duty with concentration and attention, otherwise we will have to repent our fault.

What Can a Dollar and Eleven Cents do? Question and Answers

The Hack Driver Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet

The Hack Driver Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet

In this page you can find The Hack Driver Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet, Extra Questions for Class 10 English will make your practice complete.

The Hack Driver Extra Questions and Answers Class 10 English Footprints Without Feet

The Hack Driver Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Lutkins was really ‘a hard fellow to catch’. How?
Answer:
Lutkins was really a hard fellow to catch. He was a crook. He impressed the narrator by his open friendly and affectionate nature. He disguised himself many times. He had a good relationship with all in his village. So, it was difficult to catch him.

Question 2.
How does Lutkins befool the lawyer?
Answer:
Oliver Lutkins was the hack driver. He impressed the narrator by his simplicity and pleasant appearance. He introduced himself as Bill. The hack driver made a complete fool of the narrator by taking him to all the places where he could find Lutkins but every time missed him by a fraction of minutes. He had a good understanding with his town folks who helped him in befooling the lawyer.

Question 3.
How did the hack driver sketch the character of Lutkins?
Answer:
The hack driver called Lutkins “a good for nothing fellow”. He told that Lutkins did not stick to any single place. The hack driver tried to portray Lutkins as a shrewd and shoddy person. He told the narrator that Lutkins was fond of playing poker. He borrowed money from many people. He was a perfect duper. He was known for taking people for a ride.

Question 4.
What attitude did the lawyer have for country life? How did his experience at New Mullion change it?
Answer:
The lawyer hated city life as he found city people cunning and at times very aggressive. He assumed country life to be sweet and simple but his visit to New Mullion completely changed his attitude. He was disappointed with sights at the countryside and above all, he was duped by Lutkins who changed his assumption that country life was simpler than the city life.

Question 5.
What does the narrator describe as ‘a pretty disrespectful treatment’?
Answer:
The hack driver took the narrator to the farmyard of his mother. He introduced the young lawyer to Lutkins’ mother as a young man representing the court in the city. They followed her to the kitchen. But they ran for cover as she brought out a hot iron rod from the kitchen to shove them away. The lawyer called it ‘a pretty disrespectful treatment’.

Question 6.
What did the hack driver tell the narrator about Lutkins’ mother?
Answer:
The hack driver told the narrator that Lutkins’ mother was a real terror. She was about nine feet tall and four feet thick and quick as a cat. She could also put people down by talking. It was proved when on meeting the narrator, she did not show respect for him. She chased him with a hot iron ‘ rod.

Question 7.
Describe the young lawyer’s first encounter with the hack driver.
Answer:
When the young lawyer reached New Mullion to serve summons on Oliver Lutkins, he came across a man of forty who was red-faced and cheerful. He introduced himself as Bill, the hack driver. The narrator trusted him and told him about his purpose to visit the place.

Question 8.
Who was the hack driver? What really hurt the narrator’s feelings?
Answer:
The hack driver himself was Oliver Lutkins. He was not Bill Magnuson as he had told the narrator. He had befooled the narrator. The narrator’s feelings were hurt when Lutkins and his mother both laughed at him as though he were a boy of seven.

Question 9.
Which were the places where the narrator and hack driver went to search for Lutkins? How was he missed everywhere?
Answer:
The hack driver took the narrator to many places in New Mullion to locate Lutkins. Some of them were Fritz’s place, Gustaff’s barber shop, Gray’s barber shop, poolroom and his mother’s farmyard. He was missed everywhere by five minutes or so.

Question 10.
How was the hack driver recognised?
Answer:
The lawyer was ordered to go back to New Mullion to fetch Lutkins with a man who had worked with Lutkins. He saw Bill the hack driver with Lutkin’s mother talking and laughing at the platform. His escort told him that Bill was Lutkins himself.

Question 11.
How did the people at the law firm receive the narrator?
Answer:
The Chief of the law firm was very angry with the narrator. The narrator was sent back to New Mullion to trace Oliver Lutkins with another man, who had worked with Lutkins earlier.

Question 12.
Why did the narrator, a young lawyer, not like his job in a law firm?
Answer:
The narrator, a young lawyer, did not like his job in a law firm. He joined the law firm to practise as a lawyer but he was given work of a delivery boy who had to serve summons on people. He had to-go to dirty and shadowy corners of the city. Sometimes, he even got beaten up.

Question 13.
How did Lutkins’ mother treat the lawyer?
Answer:
The hack driver ‘Bill’ introduced the narrator as a representative of the city court, and that he had a legal right to search all properties of Oliver Lutkins. The mother went inside the kitchen and got an iron rod from the old fashioned store and marched on them shouting and scaring them away.

Question 14.
Why was the narrator disappointed when he reached New Mullion?
Answer:
The narrator was disappointed when he reached New Mullion because he did not like the muddy streets and unpainted looks of shops and houses. It was a small town that held no attraction.

Question 15.
What job did the narrator get after graduation? Did he like his work?
Answer:
The narrator got the job of a junior assistant clerk in a law firm. He was assigned the job of serving summons. He did not like his work as he had to go to muddy and dirty streets and sometimes he was given a beating too. The work was somewhat mean and he wanted to change it.

Question 16.
Why was he happy to go to New Mullion? Why did he go there?
Answer:
He was happy to go to New Mullion, because it was forty miles away and he didn’t have to go to dirty and muddy streets and corners of the city to trace his victims. He had to serve summons on a man called Oliver Lutkins.

Question 17.
What sight did the lawyer find at the station “agreeable”?
Answer:
The delivery man at the station was the only agreeable sight at the station. He left a deep impression on the narrator’s mind. He was a very amiable person, the narrator really admired him. His earnest demeanour, simplicity and humour refreshed the young lawyer.

Question 18.
With what impression did the lawyer come back to the city?
Answer:
The narrator returned to the city fully satisfied and feeling great. He was happily impressed by the town New Mullion and its simple, slow-speaking, wise neighbours. He was so impressed that he wanted to settle down there.

Question 19.
Why do you think were the neighbours anxious to meet the lawyer?
Answer:
The narrator had accompanied the hack driver ‘Bill’, to find Lutkins, to many neighbourhood houses. One neighbour was left, where the narrator could not go. Lutkins and his mother described the young lawyer as an innocent boy who had been duped by Lutkins. This neighbour was also keen to look at the young lawyer who was duped by Lutkins.

Question 20.
Where did the narrator have his lunch at New Mullion? What was special about the lunch?
Answer:
The narrator was hungry. He wanted to offer lunch to the hack driver too. The hack driver suggested that they would have lunch prepared by his wife on Wade’s Hill. And he charged half a dollar from the narrator. The narrator enjoyed the peaceful scenic beauty of meadows and woods while he had his lunch.

The Hack Driver Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
In life, people who easily trust others are sometimes made to look foolish. One should not be too trusting. Describe how Oliver Lutkins made a fool of the young lawyer.
Answer:
In the story Oliver Lutkins made a fool of the young lawyer. When the lawyer reached New Mullion, Lutkins came up with his plan to fool the lawyer when the lawyer told him that he was looking for Oliver Lutkins, Lutkins openly takes the lawyer all over the village. When the lawyer said he needed to catch the afternoon train back he realized that he would need to keep him occupied till he left.

He also had to ensure that the lawyer did not speak or question anyone else about him or he would be caught. He therefore told the lawyer that Lutkins never paid anybody a cent and so if he tried to collect money from him in his fancy clothes he would be suspicious and get away. Instead he would go into Fritz’s and ask for Lutkins, and the lawyer was kept out of sight behind him.

In this way Lutkins was always the first to enter a place and prevented the lawyer from directly meeting and speaking to the people. He would then most probably take the people into his confidence so that no one let out the secret of his true identity. At last Bill cornered a friend of Lutkins and made him

admit that he had gone out to his mother’s farm. He then convinced the lawyer that Lutkins’ mother was a terror and so it was best that he dealt with her himself. He introduced himself and the lawyer to her and told her the reason for their visit. This introduction was enough for her to get an idea about what was happening and she too put on an act and did not let out the secret but managed to make a fool of the young lawyer.

Question 2.
Lutkins appeared humble but he was not. Appearances can be deceptive.
Do you think in real life we come across such people frequently? Does it indicate lack of integrity in human?
Answer:
Lutkins appeared humble but he was not. When the lawyer came to the city, he was happy to meet the hack driver. In fact, the hack driver himself was Oliver Lutkins. He impressed the lawyer with his simplicity and nature. He befooled the lawyer by taking him in search of Lutkins. He pretended to be honest and helpful but he just befooled the lawyer.

Yes, in real life we come across such people. Their appearance is deceptive. They present themselves as caring, friendly and cooperative. Initially, they show their care and concern but when they get an opportunity, they show their true colours and dupe us. There is no compassion in them. Yes, it indicates lack of integrity in human values. There is a lack of commitment, honesty and sensitiveness.

Question 3.
Lutkins played with the emotions of the young lawyer. By the end of the story, he was hurt on knowing the truth of the hack driver. Would you call Lutkins an insensitive fellow? Should we hurt the feeling of somone like this?
Answer:
Lutkins played with the emotions of the young lawyer. He impressed him by his deceptive nature. He pretended to help him. But he was making a fool out of him. He roamed around the city with the lawyer in search of Lutkins. He did not reveal that he himself was Lutkins. Wherever he went, he made the lawyer a laughing stock for others.

Everyone was amused to see how Lutkins was making a fool of the lawyer. By the end of the story when the lawyer revisited the place, he was hurt to know how the hack driver had befooled him. No doubt the hack driver was an insensitive human being. He did not care for his emotions. No, we should not hurt someone’s emotions for the sake of self entertainment

At the Vegetable Shop Question and Answers

The Lost Child Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

The Lost Child Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In this page you can find The Lost Child Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments, Extra Questions for Class 9 English will make your practice complete.

The Lost Child Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

The Lost Child Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
What was his father’s reaction to his demands?
Answer:
The child was very happy at the fair. He wanted to have a toy. His father perhaps could not afford it. He looked at him rudely and with anger. The child said nothing and kept on moving.

The Lost Child Extra Questions and Answers

Question 2.
What kind of a lady was his mother?
Answer:
His mother was a very kind lady. Her attitude was very tender. Whenever the child wanted to buy something, she tried to divert his attention to something else. She did not scold him.

The Lost Child Extra Question and Answer

Question 3.
Describe the path of the fair.
Answer:
There was a walking distance from the village to the fair. The path went through the lanes and then there was narrow, winding footpath through the mustard fields.

Question 4.
Why was the child forbidden to hear the music?
Answer:
The child was fascinated by the flute music of the snake-charmer. He wanted to stop there and enjoy the music. His parents did not allow him to hear that. They considered the flute music cheap and coarse. So he was forbidden to hear that.

Question 5.
How did the child react in front of the juggler?
Answer:
The juggler was playing the flute to a snake. The child was attracted by the music and went towards him. He knew that his parents would not like his standing there. So he moved on.

Question 6.
Where did the child’s parents stop and why?
Answer:
While going to the fair, the child’s parents stopped under the shade of a grove to rest for a while. Moreover, the scene there was quite captivating.

Question 7.
What did the child do in the grove?
Answer:
When the child entered the grove, he started collecting the raining petals in his hands. He heard the cooing of doves and ran towards his parents telling about the presence of the dove.

Question 8.
Why would his parents have refused to buy a garland of Gulmohar?
Answer:
His parents would have refused to buy a garland of Gulmohar because they thought it to be cheap. So the child did not ask for it without waiting for their reply.

Question 9.
Why did the parents refuse for the flute’s music?
Answer:
The parents refused the flute’s music to the child because they considered it coarse music. The child suppressed his feelings and kept on moving.

Question 10.
Where did the child meet a kind-hearted person?
Answer:
The child met the kind-hearted person near the shrine. The man saw the child in the crowd. He might have been trampled underfoot. His shrieks invited the attention of the kind man who lifted him up.

Question 11.
According to you, why was the child happy when he was on the way to fair? Was it the attraction of the fair or the natural beauty that he enjoyed on the way?
Answer:
The child was very happy when he was going to the fair with his parents. In my opinion, it was the natural beauty that he enjoyed on the way. He was fascinated by the natural beauty all around him. Dragonflies, insects, worms, flowers filled him with joy.

Question 12.
How can you say that the child was an obedient boy?
Answer:
The child was an obedient boy. He wanted to buy many things from the shops in the fair. Whenever he demanded, his parents refused and he obeyed quietly. He did not complain for anything. It proves that he was an obedient boy.

Question 13.
When did the child realise that he was separated from his parents? What was his response?
Answer:
The child was always lagging behind. He was lost in the wonders of the fair. When he was near the swing and expressed his desire for swing, he didn’t get a response. Then he realised that he was separated from his parents. He started crying.

Question 14.
“The child was running towards the shrine.” Why? What would have happened if he was not lifted?
Answer:
When he was separated from his parents he ran towards the shrine in their search. It was very crowded. He struggled to push through the legs of the people. If a man had not rescued him, he would have been trampled upon.

Question 15.
Do you think in the end the child was reunited with his parents? Who, according to you, had helped him?
Answer:
Yes, I think the child was reunited with his parents in the end. The kind person who rescued him in the crowd must have helped him in finding his parents. It was a small fair and the sincere efforts of that kind man must have worked.

The Lost Child Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
How did the child behave at the shop of the sweetmeat-seller? What does it show about the values of the child? Was he a considerate child?
Answer:
There was a large crowd around the counter of the sweetmeat-seller. Various colourful sweets decorated with silver and gold leaves were displayed. He was hawking “Gulab Jamun, Rasgulla, Burfi, Jalebi.” The child was fascinated. His mouth watered for his favourite Burfi. He stared opened-eyed. He wanted to have one but he knew that his parents would not allow him to get one.

He knew that they would call him greedy. So he moved on without waiting for an answer. It shows that the child was a considerate boy. He understood the limitations of his parents. He liked the sweets but he did not insist on buying them. He knew that his parents could not afford it. He was a good boy. He was not a greedy and disobedient boy.

Question 2.
What were the reactions of the child on seeing the flower-seller and the balloon-jeller? Do you think it was an obvious reaction of a child?
Answer:
The child was attracted by the fragrance of flowers. He went towards the basket of flowers. He wanted to have a garland. But knowing that his parents won’t allow, he moved on. He saw a balloon-seller holding a pole with colourful balloons. The child was simply carried away by the rainbow glory of balloons. He desired to have all of them. He knew that his parents would say that he was too old to play with them. He said nothing and moved on. Yes, it was an obvious reaction of a child. All the children are attracted to colourful balloons and toys and they want to have them. This child was very obedient and considerate as he didn’t force his parents for anything.

Question 3.
If you had been the lost child, what would you have done to find your parents in the fair?
Answer:
If I had been the lost child, my condition would have been the same. I would have run here and there in the fair, looking for my parents. I would have also cried bitterly. But I would have acted in a more sensible way. I would have avoided the crowded place. I would have gone to the office of the fair and would tell them about my address and the name of my parents and would request someone to make an announcement.

If there was no help from him, I would have waited for my parents at one place. If some kind-hearted man would help me locate my parents, I would definitely accompany him. I know they would not have gone back home without me and would have gone to the places in the fair we visited. I would not have lost patience and waited for them.

Question 4.
You are a counsellor. Write a paragraph advising parents how to ensure that the children are not lost in any crowded place like a fair, etc.
Answer:
Tips for parents
It generally happens that children are separated from their parents in public functions or fairs. In some cases children are traced and reunited with their parents. But there are cases when the children are in wrong hands and are never traceable. In order to ensure that children do not get lost, the parents have to be vigilant and extra careful. The child should never be ignored. It should not be left behind in any shop.

Sometimes, a child is so fascinated by the toys that it does not move ahead and the parents fascinated by other items leave him behind. A child should always carry on an identity card in its pocket. It should be trained how to maintain calm and approach the public address system. It is always better to fix a place of meeting in case of separation.

Question 5.
A little child’s reactions to the immediate situation bears a universal ring when examined . superficially. Delving in depth, one can see that each child reacts to a situation according to his or her individual characteristics. Write a character sketch of the little child in the lesson ‘The Lost Child’, bringing out the child’s individual traits as illustrated in the contents of the story.
Answer:
The little child in the story ‘The Lost Child’, had accompanied his parents to a village fair. Dressed in a yellow turban, he was excited and engrossed in all the activities of the fair. The child had had a sheltered upbringing where his parents were in the habit of dictating his every action. Thus, he obeyed his father’s command to follow them despite wanting to linger at the toy shop.

He was observant and fascinated by the sight of insects and worms on the footpath. The child had a strong fun-loving streak and while his parents rested in the grove, he ran around the banyan tree, gathering flower petals and listening to doves cooing. Like several children, he had a sweet tooth and enjoyed burfis. He was a restless individual drawn to immediate stimuli and temporarily let go of the safety and security of his parents, but was inconsolable when lost, and consistently pleaded to be taken to them. ‘

Question 6.
Describe the condition of the child when he was separated from his parents in /he fair. Do you think it is a natural reaction?
Answer:
When the child realised that he had been separated from his parents, then he started crying. Tears rolled down his eyes. He was filled with fear and restlessness. He panicked and ran here and there. His yellow turban had got untied. His clothes became muddy. He ran towards the shrine in search of his parents.

There was a thick crowd. Before he could be trampled upon their feet, a kind-hearted person picked him up in his arms. He took him to the roundabout and offered him many things. He asked him how he got there and where his parents were. But, the child wept more bitterly and cried for his parents. Yes, it is a natural reaction for any child of his age.

Question 7.
Compare the attitude of the child before and after his separation from his parents. The company of parents is more important than the things of pleasure. Do you agree?
Answer:
In the beginning, the child was happy and excited. He wanted to have toys, sweetmeat, flowers and many more things. Though he knew that his parents would not allow him to get the things, yet he longed for them. Mere presence of these things gave him satisfaction. After he was separated from his parents, his mood was completely changed. He started crying.

A kind-hearted person offered him all the things available in the fair. But the child declined everything. He only wanted his parents. All things had become useless for him. It shows that the company of parents is more important than the things of pleasure. The child found everything useless without his parents.

Clever Tenali Ramakrishna Question and Answers

The Adventures of Toto Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

The Adventures of Toto Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In this page you can find The Adventures of Toto Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments, Extra Questions for Class 9 English will make your practice complete.

The Adventures of Toto Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

The Adventures of Toto Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Why did grandfather buy Toto?
Answer:
Grandfather was an animal lover. Whenever he saw any attractive animal, he would buy it at any cost. He was impressed by the monkey, Toto. He bought it to add him to his private zoo.

Question 2.
Why did grandfather hide him for some time?
Answer:
Grandmother did not like grandfather’s hobby of collecting animals. She was never happy with the arrival of any new animal in the house. Grandfather wanted to avoid this fuss. So, he hid him for some time.

Question 3.
How did Toto take his bath?
Answer:
Toto enjoyed taking bath in warm water during winter. Like the author, he would first check the temperature of water with his hand. Then he would ^tep into the bathtub up to his neck. He would rub himself all over with soap.

Question 4.
Why did Toto enter the large kitchen kettle?
Answer:
One day, Toto found a large kitchen kettle full of water. It was kept on the fire to boil water for tea. Toto mistook it to be the water for bath. So, he entered the kettle with his head sticking out from it.

Question 5.
How did Toto behave with Nana?
Answer:
Toto was very naughty. He never got along well with other animals including Nana, the donkey. He was found fastening on to his long ears with his sharp teeth. He frightened the donkey.

Question 6.
How was author’s grandmother different from grandfather? Whom do you like the most?
Answer:
Author’s grandmother was different from his grandfather. She did not like animals, whereas his grandfather was an animal lover. She always fussed when his grandfather brought home some new birds or animals. I like grandfather the most.

Question 7.
How can you say that Toto was not an ordinary animal?
Answer:
Toto was not an ordinary animal. He was a very mischievous monkey. He became a headache for the family. He was so naughty that grandfather had to sell it back to the real owner.

Question 8.
From where did the grandfather buy Toto and for how much?
Answer:
The grandfather bought Toto from a tonga driver. He paid five rupees to buy it.

The Adventures of Toto Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Give a brief description of Toto, the monkey.
Answer:
Toto was a pretty monkey. His bright eyes sparkled with mischief. His teeth were pearly white. His hands always looked dried up. His fingers were quick and wicked. He had a long tail which he used as his third hand. His long tail added to his beauty. He was just like a naughty child. He was always looking for pranks.

He enjoyed upsetting everything. Once a large kettle containing water had been left on the fire to prepare tea. Toto removed the lid and got into the kettle. Grandmother saw it and saved him. He never let his companions in peace. He often frightened people by either grinning or by throwing things at them. Toto was really an adventurous monkey.

Question 2.
Why was Toto’s presence kept a secret? Where was he kept during this period? How did he behave? What does it tell about the character of grandfather? Do you think we should keep something secret from the faihily?
Answer:
Grandmother always fussed whenever a new bird or animal was brought in the house. Grandfather decided that Toto’s presence would be kept secret from her until she was in a good mood. Grandfather kept Toto in author’s bedroom’s closet. He completely ruined the closet.

He turned the author’s school blazer into shreds. He was transferred to a cage in the servants’ quarters. Toto did not allow any of his companions to sleep at night. Grandfather was an animal lover. But he cared for his family too. He did not want to annoy grandmother. It is not good to keep a secret from the family but sometimes we have to do this for their own good.

Question 3.
Give a brief character sketch of author’s grandfather describing his qualities. What values are reflected from his character?
Answer:
The grandfather was an animal lover. He was an untrained zoologist. He had made his own private zoo in his house. He was very kind towards birds and animals. Whenever he came across any animal, he would buy it at any cost, if he liked it. Sometimes he had to bear the anger of the grandmother. He was a person of strong determination. Once he bought a monkey and named it Toto. Toto troubled him in his zoo, made him pay extra fare but still he loved Toto. Love for animals, determination, good sense of humour are some of the qualities that are reflected in his character.

Question 4.
How was Toto an expensive deal for grandfather? Do you think it was a lesson for grandfather?
Answer:
Since his arrival, Toto started damaging the house and the things in it. He pulled out the peg, tore wall papers, ruined the closet and tore the author’s blazer into rags. While going to Saharanpur, at the railway station, he had to pay fare for Toto too. The grandfather thought that Toto would adjust with other animals in the zoo but it never happened. Then, the grandfather realised that it was not a very good deal. He found the Tonga driver and sold Toto back to him. Yes, I think it was a lesson for grandfather to learn that animals should not be tamed. They can live happily only in the natural habitat. They prove expensive if we act against the law of nature.

Question 5.
In the story ‘The Adventures of Toto’ we get a very clear idea of the author’s grandparents and their habits and natures. While his grandfather was an animal loveiyJiis grandmother had other qualities. Make a character study of Grandmother in the light of the above remark.
Answer:
Grandmother lived in a large bungalow with a variety of animals that grandfather kept as pets in the servants’ quarters. She being a tolerant person, had allowed animals to be on the premises but not in the main house. She was a proud homemaker and had papered cupboards with ornamental paper. She accepted grandfather’s ways and had finally allowed Toto to be lodged with Nana the family donkey.

Grandmother had an innovative streak and provided the monkey warm water for a bath which had become a great source of fun for the animal. Her sharp presence of mind had rescued the animal from being sinked when Toto had plunged into boiling water. She was a good cook and generous hostess and served biryani in special plates at her table. Thus when Toto broke her precious china, grandfather realized that her patience had been severely tested and wisely disposed off Toto.

Question6.
Do you think, it is advisable to keep a monkey like Toto as part of pets in the house? Why/Why not?
Answer:
No, it is not advisable to have a pet like Toto. Toto was a naughty monkey. Such an animal may harm the children at home and may damage the things around him. It may hurt the guests too. Moreover, animals remain happy in their natural surroundings. The wilds are always beautiful in the lap of the wild as they are born free and brought up in that environment. In the context of the story, Toto .was devoted to mischiefs due to its instincts. It was impossible for the family to afford the frequent loss caused by Toto. Moreover, he kept disturbing other pets in the house. Should he be freed, he would be happy in the forest. So, It is inhumane to keep them captive. They are happy to be free. We must not hunt or catch animals for our selfish motives. Some animals may prove dangerous too.

Question 7.
Do you have a pet? Describe your pet and compare it with Toto, the monkey.
Answer:
Yes, I have a pet. It is a dog. It is also very naughty but not as mischievous as Toto. Its name is Puffy. It was only a month old when I brought it home. In the beginning, it caused a lot of trouble for us but gradually it improved. We provided him training as well. It does not damage the objects around him. He plays with his toys only. He is very friendly with our guests too. He can differentiate between knowns and strangers.

Puffy is like a member of our family. He is very active and vigilant. He is an epitome of loyalty. He keeps sitting beside the main gate at night. When Puffy is there, no intruder can dare enter the house. He is very powerful. We feel secure in his presence. I pray to God to keep him healthy.

Painted House, Friendly Chicken and Me Question and Answers

Iswaran the Storyteller Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

Iswaran the Storyteller Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In this page you can find Iswaran the Storyteller Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments, Extra Questions for Class 9 English will make your practice complete.

Iswaran the Storyteller Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

Iswaran the Storyteller Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
What was the routine of Iswaran?
Answer:
Iswaran was a cook. He was attached to Mahendra. He cooked food, washed clothes and did other household works. After completing his work, he used to take bath and read some books. He was an asset to Mahendra.

Iswaran the Storyteller Extra Questions and Answers

Question 2.
What happened when the wild elephant entered the school playground?
Answer:
When the wild elephant entered the school playground, there was chaos. The boys ran into their classrooms and shut the doors. The elephant pulled out the football goalpost, flattened the drum and uprooted the shrubs.

Iswaran the Storyteller Short Answer Type Questions and Answers

Question 3.
How did Iswaran control the wild elephant?
Answer:
Iswaran controlled the wild elephant. He took a stick in his hand, moved forward and with all his might, whacked the elephant’s third toenail. The elephant looked stunned for a minute. Finally, it shivered and collapsed.

Question 4.
How did Mahendra see the female ghost?
Answer:
One full-moon night, Mahendra heard the sound of moaning and wailing near the window. He looked out of his window. He saw a dark cloudy form clutching a bundle. He thought it to be a female ghost. He sweated and fell back on the pillow.

Question 5.
How did Iswaran describe the female ghost?
Answer:
One day, Iswaran told Mahendra that he had seen a female ghost appearing off and on at midnight during the full-moon. It was an ugly creature with matted hair and shrivelled face. It could be seen moving around with a foetus in its arms.

Question 6.
How did Iswaran entertain Mahendra?
Answer:
Iswaran was a good storyteller. He was fond of reading books on thrill and mystery. He used to tell’ various stories to Mahendra. His stories were full of suspense, horror and adventure. He compared things with extraordinary imagination.

Question 7.
Why did Mahendra expect Iswaran to be angry?
Answer:
One day, Mahendra interrupted Iswaran from telling a useless story. He scolded him badly. So, he expected him to be angry for some days. But Iswaran did not mind that and was before him as usual.

Question 8.
“Iswaran used to read Tamil Thriller.” Do you think this affected his behaviour in any way? How?
Answer:
Iswaran used to read Tamil thrillers. Yes, it affected his behaviour. He used to narrate a small incident in a detailed way. He created suspense in small things and gave surprise endings.

Question 9.
Do you think the story of a wild elephant in the school was also a figment of imagination of Iswaran ?
Answer:
Yes, I think this story was also a figment of his imagination. He was in the habit of telling stories out of nothing. A small event of elephant’s entry in the school might have been narrated in such an elaborate way.

Question 10.
“One day Mahendra went to his bed with a certain unease.” Do you think it was the influence of Iswaran’s constant mention of ghosts?
Answer:
Yes, I think he was also influenced by Iswaran’s constant mention of ghosts. He felt the presence of some spirits around him. He saw a woman ghost outside the window of his bedroom. This scared him and he ultimately left the place.

Question 11.
Mahendra resigned from his post and left the place. What do you think, could be the reason?
Answer:
Mahendra did not believe in supernatural powers. But one day, being influenced by Iswaran, he saw a woman ghost outside his window. This scared him. He decided to leave the place immediately. He resigned from his post and went away.

Question 12.
What were the elements of Iswaran’s story?
Answer:
The elements of Iswaran’s story were a tusker and a woman ghost. The story was narrated to Ganesh by Mahendra, a supervisor in a firm.

Iswaran the Storyteller Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
How did Iswaran manage to make even the simplest incident interesting? Give an example. Do you think one should be imaginative like him?
Answer:
Instead of saying that he had seen an uprooted tree on the highway, he would say, “The road was deserted and I was alone. Suddenly I spotted something that looked like an enormous beast lying sprawled across the road. I was half inclined to turn and go back. But as I came closer, I saw that it was a fallen tree.” Iswaran was very imaginative. This is how he managed to make even the simplest incident interesting. I think one should be realistic instead of being too imaginative. If one is like Iswaran he is never trusted. His factual information is not accepted.

Question 2.
How did Iswaran tackle the elephant in the school building? Does it appear to beJikely? Do you think this is a positive trait of one’s personality?
Answer:
The elephant created chaos in the school. All the boys ran into the classrooms and shut the doors tight. Iswaran grabbed a cane from the hands of one of the teachers and ran downstairs. With the stick in his hand, Iswaran moved slowly towards the elephant. He whacked third toenail of the beast. The beast collapsed. This is how Iswaran tackled the mad elephant.

This incident does not appear to be plausible. It is difficult to believe that a child of a junior class can control a wild, mad elephant. No, it is not a desirable trait of one’s personality. Nobody believes such persons who are in the habit of boasting about things.

Question 3.
Mahendra did not believe in ghosts. What happened to him on the last full moon night? Do you think ghosts exist?
Answer:
One day Iswaran told Mahendra about a female ghost. It made him uneasy. He did not have the courage to look out of the window on a full moon night. He was woken up by a low moan close to his window: He did not want to see what there was. But out of curiosity, he looked outside the window.

He was shocked to see the ghost of a woman. The female ghost seemed to be an ugly creature with thick hair and a shrivelled face. It gave the impression of a skeleton holding a foetus in its arms. He was frightened. He broke into a cold sweat and fell back on the pillow, panting. No, I don’t think ghosts exist. It is only a figment of imagination.

Question 4.
Give a brief character sketch of Iswaran the storyteller. Do you think he is superstitious?
Answer:
Iswaran, a cook, was a perfect storyteller. He was greatly influenced by the Tamil authors. He always tried to introduce suspense and surprise in the narration of even the simplest incident. He usually left his story in the middle and would not take up again quickly. He had an amazing capacity to make stories.

He was boastful too. He boasted of his bravery in the school where he controlled a wild elephant. His stories were so lively that they used to leave a long lasting impact on the listener’s mind. No he was not a superstitious person. He was only a good story teller. He did not believe in any rituals or supernatural powers.

Question 5.
Who was Mahendra? How was Iswaran helpful to him?
Answer:
Mahendra was a junior superviser in a firm. Iswaran was quite attached to him and remained with him uncomplainingly wherever he was posted. Iswaran was very helpful to Mahendra. He cooked for him, washed his clothes and told him endless stories. He had an amazing capacity to produce vegetables and cooking ingredients anywhere. Mahendra’s trust in Iswaran is appreciable. He always praises him for his talent as a cook. He respects his feelings. Whenever Iswaran tells him any story, Mahendra knows that it is not true but he never scolds him.

Question 6.
‘Ghosts are a figment of our imagination.’ Discuss.
Answer:
Ghosts exist only in stories. According to some people, ghosts are the unsatisfied souls of the dead people. It is not scientific. After one’s death, it is not possible for one to come back in the shape of human beings. Some people love mystery for their own sake. Iswaran read thrillers which made him see the ghosts. Mahendra was an educated person but he was told about the female ghost by Iswaran. He had seen the female ghost only after Iswaran told him about it. It was a case of hallucination.

Question 7.
If you were Mahendra, what decision would you take at the end of the story?
Answer:
Though I would have reacted the same way after seeing the ghost, yet I would have gone into the depth of the mystery instead of leaving. Being educated, I would not believe it blindly. I would have taken the help of Iswaran and tried to follow the image. I would have tried to find out footprints the next morning.

Even Iswaran would be in my suspicion. I would have searched the are.a around my house and looked for some clues. I would not leave the mystery unresolved. Courageously I would have discussed it with Iswaran whether he had created any mischief in the guise of a woman ghost. I would also have tried to find any other things kept in the room that creates this riddle. It would have been my priority to know the fact.

Question 8.
Describe Iswaran as a cook. What are his qualities that attract you the most?
Answer:
Iswaran was a middle-aged man with a multifaceted personality. He belonged to South India and was literate. He worked as a cook for Mahendra. He was an expert cook. He would produce vegetables and cooking ingredients, seemingly out of nowhere. Without any shops for miles around, he would arrange fresh vegetables in no time. He was an asset for Mahendra. He was a very obedient person. He obeyed his master Mahendra with full dedication. He was like a magician in the art of cooking.

Iswaran is also a good storyteller. He makes his stories vivid by telling them in a unique style. He made use of gestures and dramatic skills to give a sound effect. He told stories with action. Suspense and surprise were the chief qualities of his stories that attracted us the most.

Question 9.
If you were Mahendra, would you expect Iswaran to be angry? Give reasons.
Answer:
One day, Mahendra interrupted Iswaran from telling a useless story. He felt unrest and asked him to stop telling such silly stories. He scolded him badly. So, he expected him to be angry for some days. But Iswaran did not mind that, and he was before him as usual.

If I were Mahendra, I would have not expected Iswarean to be angry. He knew’ that he was wrong. It was really unfair on his part to create unnecessary sensation in people’s hearts and minds by his stories which were really beyond imagination. I was surprised at his cheerful and talkative behaviour next day because he was a cheerful person, and so he had never felt insulted.

The Turning Point Question and Answers

The Happy Prince Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

The Happy Prince Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In this page you can find The Happy Prince Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments, Extra Questions for Class 9 English will make your practice complete.

The Happy Prince Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

The Happy Prince Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Where was the statue?
Answer:
The statue of the Happy Prince was on a tall pillar at a high place in the city. It was a beautiful statue. It was gilded all over with thin leaves of fine gold. For eyes it had two sapphires.

The Happy Prince Extra Questions and Answers

Question 2.
Where was the swallow going? Why did he stop there?
Answer:
The swallow was going to Egypt. His friends had gone to Egypt six weeks before but he had stayed behind. So he was going to join them. He stopped near the statue to take some rest during the night. There was plenty of air. So he stopped there.

The Happy Prince Extra Question and Answer

Question 3.
Why did the Happy Prince ask the swallow to stay?
Answer:
The Happy Prince told the swallow that he wanted to help the poor but he could not move as his feet were fastened to the pedestal. He requested the swallow to stay there and take the ruby to the seamstress.

Question 4.
What happened to the swallow in the end?
Answer:
The swallow decided to help the people through the Happy Prince. He stayed there for many days. Now the winter had come and there was frost all around. In the end, the swallow died due to frost. The weather was so bad for him that he could not survive.

Question 5.
What happened to the Happy Prince’s leaden heart?
Answer:
Happy Prince’s leaden heart did not melt in the furnace. It was thrown away. The angels considered the leaden heart the most precious thing in the city. They took it to the heaven.

Question 6.
Why did the workmen at the foundry throw the leaden heart?
Answer:
The workmen at the foundry threw the leaden heart on the heap of garbage, because it did not melt in the furnace. They found it useless.

Question 7.
How did God reward the prince and the swallow?
Answer:
God rewarded the Happy Prince and the swallow by giving them a place in heaven. The swallow will sing forever in the garden of paradise and the Happy Prince will live in the city of gold.

Question 8.
Why did the Swallow cry when the Happy Prince asked him to pluck out one of the sapphires?
Answer:
When the happy Prince asked the swallow to pluck out one of the sapphires from his eyes he felt that that it was really a cruel and painful task. He was aggrieved to such a heartless job, so he cried.

The Happy Prince Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
How did the Happy Prince help the seamstress?
Answer:
The Happy Prince helped the seamstress by giving a ruby. He could see her that she was tired due to over work. Her little son was sick. He was thirsty and asking for oranges. The poor seamstress had nothing to give him but river water. The Happy Prince felt pity for them. The prince asked the swallow to pluck out his ruby from the hilt of his sword and give it to the old poor seamstress. The swallow obeyed his order and placed the ruby beside the woman. He fanned the sick boy by his wings and made him comfortable. It shows that the Happy Prince had empathy, sympathy and kindness in his character. He acted out of concern and compassion.

Question 2.
How did the Happy Prince and the little swallow help the playwright?
OR
How did the little swallow carry out the wishes of the Happy Prince to playwright? What do you learn from the character of the prince and the swallow?
Answer:
The playwright was to finish the play for a theatre. It was very cold. He was hungry too. He did not have money to arrange for food and fire. The Happy Prince requested the swallow to pluck out the sapphire from one of his eyes and take it to the playwright. The swallow took the sapphire to the playwright.

Now he could buy food and firewood. Thus the Prince and the swallow helped the young playwright. Both the Happy Prince and the swallow sacrificed their lives for others. ‘Service before self’ is what they teach. They were kind, sympathetic, caring and sacrificing. I learn from them that God loves those who serve others. ‘

Question 3.
‘Goodness can never be destroyed.’ Do you agree? Illustrate with reference to the story ‘The Happy Prince’.
Answer:
Yes, I agree with the statement, “Goodness can never be destroyed”. In the story the Happy Prince had goodness for all. He had a kind heart and was moved by the widespread poverty and misery of the people. So, he had his great will to help others in adverse circumstances. He gave his eyes, gold and jewels to the poor. The swallow was the messenger of the Happy Princes. When the swallow died at his feet, the heart of the Happy Prince was broken into two due to its death. The statue of Happy Prince was no longer useful and beautiful. It was pulled down. When the statue was melted in a furnace, the leaden heart did not melt because goodness can never be destroyed.

Question 4.
Imagine yourself as the swallow who flew over the city and had seen the widespread poverty. Describe your feelings.
Answer:
I have been living with the Happy Prince for the last many days, helping the poor and the needy. He has already given his eyes and jewels to the poor. He still wants to help the poor. Today, I flew over the city. The rich were making merry in their beautiful houses while the beggars were sitting at their gates. When I flew into dark lanes, I saw the white-faced starving children. I saw two little boys under a bridge. They were very hungry. The watchman shouted at them and chased them away. They went out in the rain.

Question 5.
‘The two most precious things in the city’ were the Happy Prince and the swallow. Do you agree? Illustrate.
Answer:
The two most precious things in the city were the leaden heart of the Happy Prince and the dead swallow. The Happy Prince had sacrificed his all to serve the suffering humanity and help the poor. The swallow fulfilled the wishes of the Happy Prince. He sacrificed his self-interest of going to Egypt. He carried gold and jewels to the suffering people. He remained with the Prince in the bad weather. He died at the Prince’s feet. So, the angel was right when it took the leaden heart of the Prince and the dead swallow to heaven.

Question 6.
“The Happy Prince had compassion for the poor.” How do you think the swallow came to know about it?
Answer:
The Happy Prince had pity and compassion for the poor. When the swallow landed there, he saw the Happy Prince weeping at the miserable condition of the people around him. The swallow at once realised that he had compassion for the poor. Compassion is a good value that everyone should have. We should have good feelings for others. We should understand the needs of others and help them. If someone is leading a miserable life, we should have compassion for him and help. It makes us a good human being. The Happy Prince and the Swallow had compassion for the poor and the needy. They were rewarded by God for their sympathy and compassion for the poor.

Question 7.
Why could, according to you, the Happy Prince not see the misery of people when he was alive ? What does it show about his character?
Answer:
When the Happy Prince was alive, he could not see the misery of people because he was never out of his palace and was happy throughout his life. He lived a comfortable life inside the palace and never saw the misery and ugliness of the people around him. Being a Prince, he never knew about the sorrows and sufferings of the people. But, in real sense, his heart could feel the misejy of the people around him. The Happy Prince was kind and sympathetic. When he saw misery all around he wept for others. He sacrificed everything for the good of others. It shows that he was kind and compassionate for others and helpful to the suffering society.

Question 8.
The Swallow in the story ‘The Happy Prince’ played a crucial role in making the Prince happy. What traits does the bird profess which makes it fulfil its tasks?
Answer:
The swallow enjoyed flying and was excited about reaching Egypt, where they awaited his arrival. He was inquisitive. When he saw there was no rain falling and yet drops fell on him, before looking for a dry chimney pot, he ascertained that they were falling from the cheeks of the Happy Prince. Being extremely helpful, he offered to deliver the ruby to the seamstress so that she could buy food for her son. He also fanned the boy with his wings to cool his feverish state. The swallow was extremely compromising and delayed his departure to Egypt in order to carry out the wishes of the Happy Prince, by delivering his gems and gold to the needy in the city. The painstaking bird plucked leaf after leaf of the gold plating on the statue and gave it to the poor and sacrificed his life for the Happy Prince.

Question 9.
“Good deeds always pay.” Do you agree? How were the Happy Prince and the swallow rewarded for their good deeds?
Answer:
Yes, good deeds always pay in one’s life. A good deed is the one which makes someone happy. When we help a person in his problems we are blessed. So, it should be our aim to help the suffering humanity. It is not only the person but God will also be happy. We are satisfied when we do a good act. A bad deed always hurts. One is never happy and satisfied. In fact, the Happy Prince and the Swallow helped the suffering people as much as they could. Both the Happy Prince and the swallow were rewarded for their good deeds by God. They found a permanent place in heaven. Good deeds always make us warm and happy.

Question 10.
If the Happy Prince had been alive and had known the misery of people, he would have made a lot of difference to the lives of people. Do you agree? Justify.
Answer:
A king full of compassion and sympathy for his people can never see them in misery. Unfortunately our traditional kings, though very kind and compassionate, were never aware of their people’s misery. But the Happy Prince was a kind prince. When he was alive, he sacrificed everything for the welfare of his subordinates. But he never came to know about their misery. When he knew it, it was too late. I think if he had been alive, he would have made a lot of difference to the lives of his people.

Question 11.
How did the Happy Prince and the little swallow help the matchgirl? How will you feel if you help someone in need?
Answer:
The Happy Prince told the swallow that a poor little girl sells matchboxes. Her matches had fallen in the gutter and they all were spoiled. She was crying. If she did not take money home, her father would beat her. The Prince also pointed out that she was barefooted. He requested the swallow to pluck the sapphire from his other eye and give it to the girl. The swallow plucked the sapphire and gave it to the girl. Helping someone in need is always a noble act. One is blessed. If I help someone in need, it will give me a lot of satisfaction. The sparrow and the prince found the girl in need and they helped her. It brought them close to God. It was a great act on their part.

Question 12.
How did the Happy Prince help the poor and the starving children? What lesson do you learn from the story?
Answer:
The Happy Prince had become blind now. He had given his eyes to the playwright and to the matchgirl. Now he requested the swallow to stay with him forever. The swallow flew over the city and told the sufferings of the poor to the Prince. The Prince was deeply moved.

He asked the swallow to take off the gold leaves from his body and give them away to the poor. The swallow picked off the gold leaf after leaf till the Happy Prince looked dull and grey. The swallow distributed the gold among the poor and the starving children to make them happy. The lesson provides a valueable lesson to be always ready to help the people in need.

A Journey through the Hills and Valleys Question and Answers

The Last Leaf Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

The Last Leaf Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In this page you can find The Last Leaf Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments, Extra Questions for Class 9 English will make your practice complete.

The Last Leaf Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

The Last Leaf Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Who were Sue and Johnsy and how were they living?
Answer:
Sue and Johnsy were two young artists. Their economic condition was not good. They were stragglers. They lived in the artist colony. They shared a small flat. They both were good friends.

The Last Leaf Extra Questions and Answers

Question 2.
What did the doctor say about Johnsy’s chances of recovery?
Answer:
Johnsy had pneumonia. Due to some financial crisis, she got depressed and lost faith in life. The doctor said that she would not recover unless she had a wish to live. Her willingness to live could save her.

The Last Leaf Extra Question and Answer

Question 3.
Why did Johnsy link her death to the last leaf?
Answer:
Johnsy was emotionally disturbed. She developed a belief that she would die with the fall of the last leaf on the creeper. She started counting the leaves. In fact, she had an attack of depression too.

Question 4.
How did Behrman react to Johnsy’s fancy?
Answer:
When Behrman came to know about Johnsy’s belief regarding the fall of leaves, he saw the creeper and realised that the last leaf was sure to fall. He said nothing and went out. He decided to do something to save her life. It was his masterpiece that saved Johnsy.

Question 5.
What sacrifice did Behrman make for Johnsy?
Answer:
Behrman was an old artist. He knew that the last leaf was sure to fall that night. He decided to paint a leaf on the wall. It was a stormy night. It was raining heavily. But Behrman completed the job. He caught pneumonia and died.

Question 6.
How did Behrman die?
Answer:
Behrman was an old artist of sixty years. While painting the leaf on the wall, he was completely drenched. He caught pneumonia and died. But before his death, he was successful in fulfiling his dream of making a masterpiece.

The Last Leaf Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Most of the teenagers today have baseless fear like Johnsy had in the story “The Last LeaP. It is very common among the teenagers who go into depression. Sue, as a good friend, helps Johnsy in coming out of the situation. According to you, what role can the peer group play in such conditions?
Answer:
Most teenagers today have baseless fear like Johnsy had in the story ‘The Last leaf’. Sometimes it leads them to depression. Johnsy had developed a fancy idea. She linked her life to the falling leaves of an Ivy creeper. She began to think that she would die with the fall of the last leaf. Her condition went from bad to worse each day. Sue was worried about her health.

She tried all medicines but all in vain. She knew that Johnsy was in depression. In a situation of depression, peer group plays a very important role. The patient needs positive moral support. Any negative treatment would worsen the situation. Sue handled the situation intelligently. She convinced Behrman to make an artificial leaf in the window. The leaf looked so real that it made Johnsy believe that her life would not end. It changed her mindset. It was the peer group that helped her in coming out of depression.

Question 2.
What did Johnsy believe about the falling leaves? Did Sue believe the same thing? But at the same time, she does not argue with Johnsy and contradicts her belief. She comforts her. Do you think a good friend should have all these qualities in his/her character?
Answer:
Johnsy had an attack of pneumonia. She had lost all interest in life. An ivy creeper was growing against the wall of a neighbouring house. It was autumn and the leaves of the creeper were falling. Johnsy linked the falling of leaves to her life. She thought that with the falling of each leaf, she was nearing her death. Sue told her that there could be no relationship between falling leaves and her life.

But, at the same time, Sue did not argue with Johnsy and did not contradict her belief. It shows the maturity and understanding of human nature. It was her maturity and willingness to help her friend in her bad time. She convinced Behrman to help her. She left no stone unturned in saving Johnsy’s life. A good friend should always be like Sue who is mature, sincere and understanding.

Question 3.
Behrman sacrificed his life for someone he did not know’. It was a supreme sacrifice, a selfless service. Discuss.
Answer:
Behrman was an old artist, when he came to know about the fanciful idea of Johnsy about the leaf, he decided to help her. He knew that the last leaf would fall in the stormy night. He did not know Johnsy personally but decided to help her. When Sue told him the whole story of Johnsy he decided to paint the leaf on the wall facing the window during the stormy night.

He succeeded in his mission and saved the precious life of a young artist. But he caught pneumonia and died of it. It was a supreme sacrifice by the old artist. In my opinion, people like Behrman, who sacrifice for others, never die. Their art is immortal. They live in our heart forever. It is a rare virtue in one’s character. His noble act is an example of extraordinary gesture of humanity.

Question 4.
Willingness to live is more important than medication. Do you agree?
Answer:
Willingness to live is more important than medication. It is true where there is a will there is a way. Johnsy was suffering from pneumonia which could be cured by medication but she had lost the will to live which could not be cured by medicines. It was only the willingness that could cure her. One should never give up hope. I learn from her story that willingness to live is more important than medication. If we are ill we should never give up hope to live. Even if medication fails, willingness to live and faith in God keep us alive. Sue and Behrman generated hope and willingness in Johnsy which revived her from her serious illness.

Question 5.
Discuss Sue’s role in saving the fife of her friend, Johnsy. What qualities of the character of Sue are revealed that impress you?
Answer:
Without Sue’s efforts, Johnsy would not have recovered. When Johnsy fell ill, Sue did everything for her recovery. When Sue realised Johnsy’s depression and reluctance to live, she diverted her attention by talking about clothes, fashion, etc. Sue tried to convince Johnsy that the falling leaves had nothing to do with her life. It was a natural phenomenon during autumn. She discussed the whims of Johnsy with Behrman who created a leaf on the wall. It saved her life. In all, it was Sue, who inspired Behrman to paint a leaf and save Johnsy’s life. Maturity, wisdom, resourcefulness, concern, love and affection for a friend are the values that make Sue a true friend and a good human being.

Question 6.
Sometimes people have deceptive appearances and their gruff exteriors hide a generous heart. Find traits in Behrman’s character to prove this point.
Answer:
Behrman was a sixty-year-old unsuccessful painter, who lived in the same building as Sue and Johnsy and made his living by working as a live model for the other painters in the building. He was a day-dreamer in regard to his artistic skills and hoped to paint a masterpiece some day. He was a rational person otherwise, and scoffed at superstitions. Thus he questioned Johnsy’s superstitious belief about dying when the last ivy leaf fell.

He was capable of extreme sacrifices and painted an ivy leaf on the wall in the rain because that would assuage Johnsy’s superstitious belief and give her the strength of spirit to want to live on. He was a quiet and unassuming person who did not like’ advertising his deeds and made the supreme sacrifice of his life by going out on a rainy night and painting the ivy leaf masterpiece that saved a human life.

Question 7.
Johnsy, in the story ‘The Last Leaf, was an ideal roommate to Sue. How far do you agree? Find character traits in her to prove or disprove this point.
Answer:
Johnsy was a struggling painter by profession, who shared lodgings with a fellow painter Sue, in a flat on the third floor of an old building. She was a companionable flat mate when she was keeping well and the two shared common interests in food and fashions. Johnsy was a bad patient and when she fell ill with pneumonia, she lost her spirit and reconciled herself to die. She was a superstitious person, and believed that her life would end when the last leaf on the ivy creeper outside her window, fell.

She was quick to realize her faults and worked hard towards mending her ways. Thus when she saw the leaf clinging to the creeper she realized that she had been irrational and a source of trouble to her roommate. Thus Johnsy a self-motivated and reformed individual now, who strove hard to quash her weaknesses and rise above superstition.

Question 8.
The story ‘The Last Leaf is a story of supreme sacrifice by an old artist. Do you agree? What makes a masterpiece — money value or the supreme sacrifice?
Answer:
Behrman was a poor old artist. He wanted to draw a masterpiece but he never got a unique idea for that. Once Johnsy, a young artist, fell ill seriously and developed a fanciful belief that she would die with the fall of the last leaf on the creeper outside her window. Behrman painted the last leaf in the stormy night. He himself got fever and fell down with pneumonia. He died two days after painting the leaf.

It saved Johnsy’s life but took away the old painter’s life. It was a supreme sacrifice of the old artist. The last leaf painted by him became his masterpiece. It was a masterpiece not because of its monetary or artistic value. It was because it saved someone’s life. It was a symbol of sacrifice by an artist for another one. It is not the money value that makes the work great, it is the motive behind the work that makes it great.

Question 9.
“A friend in need is a friend indeed.” Do you think the story ‘The Last Leaf supports this statement? Explain with reference to Sue.
Answer:
It is true that a real friend is one who helps you in need. In the story, Sue and Johnsy were good friends and artists. Sue was always with Johnsy who was suffering from pneumonia and had lost her will to live. Johnsy believed that she would die with the falling of the last leaf on the ivy creeper. Sue tried to instil in her a desire to live a happy life. She was optimistic and always remained a constant companion to Johnsy. Sue shared it with Behrman and both of them helped Johnsy in regaining her wish to live in their own ways. Sue proves that a true friend is one who we can turn to in our times of trouble. He/She never disappoints us. Thus, the story “The Last Leaf” supports the given statement.

Question 10.
According to you, what saved Johnsy, the medicine or her willingness to live?
Answer:
It is the determination and strong willpower that helps a patient recover sooner. Johnsy felt dejected and depressed due to the attack of pneumonia. She had lost her will to live. Medicine was ineffective. She thought that she would die with the fall of the last leaf on the ivy creeper. But Behrman and Sue brought her out of this pessimistic idea and convinced her that there was no relationship’ between her life and the falling of the leaf. Moreover, Behrman painted a leaf so beautiful and so natural that would exist for ever. Thus, her willingness to live saved her. In fact, a person with strong willpower and determination can do anything.

The Art of Weaving Question and Answers

A House is not a Home Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In this page you can find A House is not a Home Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments, Extra Questions for Class 9 English will make your practice complete.

A House is not a Home Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

A House is not a Home Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Why did the author feel isolated in his new school?
Answer:
After passing the junior high school, the author joined a new school. He was very popular among his old teachers and friends in the old school. But in the new school, he had to restart as a fresher. He did not have any friend there. So he felt isolated in his new school.

A House is not a Home Extra Questions and Answers

Question 2.
Why did the author visit his old school? How did his teachers encourage him?
Answer:
He could not adjust himself in the new school. He missed his old teachers and friends so much that he would go back and visit them. They encouraged him to get involved in school activities so that he could meet new people and make new friends.

A House is not a Home Extra Question and Answer

Question 3.
Why did the author love his cat so much?
Answer:
The author had a pet cat which was his constant companion and a source of entertainment. He was fond of her and could never think of living away from her. He had a special bond with her because he had rescued her when she was a small kitten.

Question 4.
On seeing the house on fire, what did the author do?
Answer:
His house caught fire and soon the whole roof was engulfed in flames. The author was shocked but he showed his presence of mind and ran out to the neighbours to call the fire brigade.

Question 5.
Why did the mother run back into the house for the second time?
Answer:
His mother wanted to collect letters and pictures of her late husband. These were very precious to her. They were the only things that she had as her husband’s last memory. She did not want these precious memories to go into the flames. So she ran back into the house for the second time.

Question 6.
Why did the firemen hold the author?
Answer:
The author loved his mother too much. He saw his mother running into the burning house. He was emotionally charged and tried to follow her. The firemen stopped him forcefully, otherwise he would have jumped into fire. He could have lost his life.

Question 7.
What happened to his mother who had run into the burning house?
Answer:
In her efforts to collect the pictures and letters of her late husband, his mother entered the burning house and inhaled a lot of smoke. She fell unconscious. The firemen rescued her and she was put on oxygen mask. Soon she regained her senses and became all right.

Question 8.
How did the author feel when he went to his new school after the fire accident?
Answer:
One day after the fire accident, the author’s mother asked him to go to school. He did not have proper clothes and shoes as they all were burnt in the fire. He felt embarrassed in his weird clothes. He felt as if he was an outcast. He felt so depressed that he just wanted to curl up and die.

Question 9.
What were the only things not destroyed in the fire?
Answer:
The fire had destroyed everything in the house. If something was not burnt, it was destroyed by the water and chemicals used to extinguish the fire. The only things that were saved, were the photo albums, documents and some other personal items that the mother had managed to bring A out.

Question 10.
Why could the author not get money from the bank? How did they manage the funds?
Answer:
Everything was lost in the fire. There was no cash, no credit cards or even any identification which could enable them to withdraw money from the bank. Everything had gone up in smoke. They borrowed some money from the grandparents.

Question 11.
How did the author get rid of his feelings of loss and tragedy?
Answer:
His new friends in the new school and the kindness of the lady, who returned his cat, helped the author in getting rid of his feelings of loss and tragedy. He regained confidence. Now he wanted to live happily in. his new ‘home’.

Question 12.
What three things made author’s house ‘a home’?
Answer:
The fire tragedy changed the author’s life. He was so depressed that he did not want to grow up and wanted to die. But his reunion with his cat, his new friends in the school and his new house made his house ‘a home’ where he could live.

A House is not a Home Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Describe the author’s love for his cat. Do you also have the same feelings for your pet?
Answer:
When the narrator lost everything in the fire, he did not cry but when he realised that his cat was missing, he broke down in tears. He used to visit his old house every day hoping to find his missing cat. A month later a woman contacted him and gave him his cat. On seeing the cat, he leapt up ‘and cried into that beautiful orange fur.’

He was very happy. He forgot about the loss caused by the fire. He remarked, ‘My cat was back and so was I’. It reveals the love for animals. Yes, I also have the same feelings for my cat. I can’t live without her. Whenever she is out of sight, I become restless. I take very good care of my pet cat ‘Pussy’.

Question 2.
How did a wonder woman bring happiness back in the life of the author? Making someone happy by our deeds is the best service to God and his creation. Do you agree?
Answer:
Making someone happy by our deeds is the best service to God and his creation. In the story, the author lost his cat whom he loved the most. After the fire, he could not find his cat anywhere. He broke down and cried bitterly. In fact, when the fire broke out, the cat was so scared that it had run away about a mile and lost its way home. A kind lady found the cat and tried to contact the author over the phone. But all the phone lines were out of order due to the fire. At last, the lady located the address of the author. She gave him his cat. The author was extremely grateful to the wonder lady who had given him a new l,ease of life.

Question 3.
Write a brief character sketch of the author. What impresses you the most?
Answer:
The author is a bright, loving, affectionate, sensitive and emotional boy. He is academically bright and popular among his old teachers and old class fellows. He actively participates in the activities. He feels lonely and lost in the new school. After the fire tragedy, he feels isolated and depressed at the loss of his cat and house. His emotional and sensitive nature makes him cry. He loves his mother too much.

He displays the value of gratefulness. He is grateful to the lady who brought his cat back. He expresses his gratefulness to his class fellows who supported him in school. His love for his mother and his cat, his attachment to his old school and teachers are some values that have impressed me.

Question 4.
The author in the lesson. ‘A House Is Not a Home’ had lost everything in the fire. Everyone in the school felt concerned and helped him. Their selfless love and concern touched his heart and changed his misconception about people. Do you agree that selfless love, concern for someone, compassion and gratitude one should always imbibe in one’s personality? Elaborate taking the examples from the story.
Answer:
The author in the Lesson ‘A House Is Not a Home’ has lost everything in the fire. Everyone in his new school felt concerned for him. They offered all sorts of help to him. The selfless love and concern touched his heart and changed his misconception about people. He was not comfortable in his new school. He never thought that one day he would get all attention in the school.

But when he got love and affection there, he changed his opinion. Selfless love and concern are the values that can win anybody. Courtesy, help and concern bring people closer. The lady who brought the cat back to the author appeared to be an angel to the author. The teacher and the students who helped him were just like the messengers of God for him. Selfless love, concern for others, compassion and gratitude are the values that make a man a perfect human being.

Question 5.
“This was not the kind of attention I was looking for.” He did not want sympathy, Jie wanted self respect and recognition. What kind of attention did the author get in his new school?
Answer:
The news of fire reached his school. Everyone was aware of his plight. All the teachers knew about his hardship. His classmates also gave him sympathetic looks. The author felt embarrassed as if somehow he himself was responsible for his plight. He remarked, “This was not the kind of attention I was looking for.” Yes, the author did not want any sympathy.

He had a misconception about his new school and the new teachers. But he was not right. They had selfless love and concern for him. The author realised that he was not under any obligation. It was a true human gesture for him. The story teaches various values that all of us must imbibe in our life. Consideration and concern for others, cooperation, compassion, friendship, fellow feeling and gratitude are some of them.

The Why – Why Girl Question and Answers

The Accidental Tourist Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In this page you can find The Accidental Tourist Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments, Extra Questions for Class 9 English will make your practice complete.

The Accidental Tourist Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

The Accidental Tourist Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Why did the author have to return to a hotel desk frequently?
Answer:
The author was a confused person. He used to forget things frequently. While staying in a hotel, he used to forget his room number. He had to return to the hotel desk frequently to ask what his room number was.

Question 2.
What did the author want to get out of his carry bag at the London airport?
Answer:
The author had joined ‘British Airways’ frequent flyer programme. On reaching London with his family, he remembered that he had put the card in his carry bag. He wanted to take it out of the bag to avail himself of the discount.

Question 3.
What were the things that rained out of his bag at the airport?
Answer:
When the author tried to open his bag, the zip got jammed. He pulled it harder. It broke and the bag opened abruptly. It had newspaper cuttings, tin of pipe tobacco, magazines, passport, money, films, etc. which rained out of the bag.

Question 4.
Why did the author cry, “My finger! My finger!”?
Answer:
While opening the bag, the zip got jammed. He tried to open it forcefully. His finger got a sharp cut and started bleeding. When he saw blood coming out of the finger, he started crying “My finger, my finger!”

Question 5.
Why did the lady in the plane look at the author with a stupefied expression?
Answer:
Being absent-minded, the author knocked a soft drink onto the lap of a sweet lady sitting beside him. She ignored it as an accident and said nothing. But when the same incident was repeated immediately, she looked at the author with a stupefied expression.

Question 6.
Why does the author not eat or drink while travelling alone?
Answer:
The author always does a liquid mischief while eating or drinking in a flight. He had faced many awkward and embarrassing situations while on the flight. Once he split the cold drink on a lady’s dress. Hence, he does not eat or drink while travelling alone.

The Accidental Tourist Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
Bill Bryson is a confused person and irritates his fellows, yet he is loveable. What are the qualities in his character that make him loveable?
Or
Give a brief character sketch of Bill Bryson, ‘The Accidental Tourist’, stating the reasons for your liking of his.
Answer:
Bill Bryson is easily confused. While travelling by air, he always does one or another liquid mischief. When he goes to a lavatory, he ends up standing in an alley. He has to return to the hotel desk frequently just to ask what his room number is. On planes, when the food is delivered, he tries to take extra precaution but every time he does a mistake. He tries to be civilised and polite but he fails.

He is not calculative. He fails to get benefits from the airlines scheme. Bill Byrson, no doubt irritates his fellow passengers and family members yet he is loved by all. It is because he has good manners. He is courteous to all. He is polite and always asks for apology. His gentlemanliness makes him a lovable character.

Question 2.
Bill Bryson ‘ached, to be suave’. What were the things that he wanted to do but could not succeed in? What does it show about his character? Would you call him careless?
Answer:
Bill Bryson always wanted to rise from a dinner table without hitting anything but he always broke one or another thing on the table. He wanted to get in a car without leaving 14 inches of coat outside. He wanted to wear light-coloured trousers without discovering at the end of the day that he had at various times sat on chewing gum, ice cream, cough syrup and motor oil. But he could never do these things.

He never got his frequent flyer miles. It shows that Bill Byrson is a confused person. No, he can’t be called a careless person.He does not act carelessly. He tries to do the things in a systematic way but it always turns to be ‘an accidental act’. He was in fact a simpleton who needed to learn more practical w’ays of life. One must not be too simple to be called as careless.

Question 3.
Bill Bryson must fly 1,00,000 miles a year but he did not get his air miles. Why? How does absentmindedness result in loss? Explain with reference to the story.
Answer:
Bill Bryson was a forgetful person. He had joined the frequent flyer programme of various airlines, he travelled by. But he always forgot to ask for the entry of the mileage in the card with the result that he had travelled about 1 lakh miles in a year but had only 212 miles on his record, that too, divided among twenty-three airlines. This had become a real frustration for him. Everyone, he knew, was entitled for a first-class flight to Bali but he could not collect his points because of his absentmindedness. Absentmindedness is a personality trait which may result in irreparable loss. Bill Bryson suffers from financial loss due to his absentmindedness. One should be alert to gain in life.

The Bond of Love Question and Answers

Weathering the Storm in Ersama Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

Weathering the Storm in Ersama Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

In this page you can find Weathering the Storm in Ersama Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments, Extra Questions for Class 9 English will make your practice complete.

Weathering the Storm in Ersama Extra Questions and Answers Class 9 English Moments

Weathering the Storm in Ersama Extra Questions and Answers Short Answer Type

Question 1.
Where had Prashant gone on 27th October 1999? Why?
Answer:
Ersama is a small town in coastal Odisha. Prashant had gone to block headquarters of Ersama on 27th October 1999. He went there to spend the day with a friend, seven years after his mother’s death.

Weathering the Storm in Ersama Extra Questions and Answers

Question 2.
Why was falling of two coconut trees on the roof of Prashant’s friend’s house a blessing in disguise?
Answer:
The falling of two coconut trees on the roof was a blessing in disguise because the tender coconuts from the trees kept the trapped family from starving during the fateful days that followed.

Weathering the Storm in Ersama Short Answer Type Questions and Answers

Question 3.
What was the effect of cyclone on Prashant’s village?
Answer:
Prashant was shocked after he reached his village. Where their house once stood, there were only . remnants. All the ninety-six houses in his village were washed away, Children were left orphaned. There was devastation all around. Eighty-six lives were lost in his village.

Question 4.
What did Prashant do for the orphans?
Answer:
Prashant decided to help the orphans. He brought them together and put up a polythene sheet shelter for them. Women were requested to look after them properly. He also arranged food for them.

Question 5.
What did Prashant do to divert the attention of the women?
Answer:
Prashant wanted to divert the attention of the women who had lost their family members. He persuaded them to start working in the food-for-work programme started by an NGO. He organised sports activities for children.

Question 6.
Narrate the storm in Ersama in your own words.
Answer:
The storm in Ersama was so fierce that it brought destruction and wreaked havoc everywhere. It brought a devastating flood that took many lives and left people homeless.

Weathering the Storm in Ersama Extra Questions and Answers Long Answer Type

Question 1.
How was Prashant’s village affected by the cyclone? How did he take a lead to help the people? What would have been your reaction in such a condition?
Answer:
Prashant saw that 2,500 people were crowded in a shelter. All the houses in his village were washed away. Eighty-six lives were lost in the village. There was not enough to eat. They had survived on green coconuts which were not adequate. Prashant organised a group of youths and elders. They pressurised the merchant to part with rice. After that the youth task force gathered empty utensils from the shelter.

The children were deputed to lie in the sand with these utensils on their stomach. They succeeded in sending the message to helicopters who threw food packets. As a responsible youth. I would have acted the same way as Prashant. I would lead the movement. I would have organised relief camps and help in arranging food and medicines. I would be an active member of the youth task force.

Question 2.
The true traits of an individual come to the fore in times of emergency. What traits come to one’s notice in Prashant, during the calamity that struck Ersama in coastal Orissa?
Answer:
The storm at Ersama, left a deep impact on the observant Prashant, who realised that he had never before seen such a destruction. His self-determination made him turn a deaf ear to all warnings and set out in search of his family, wading through water across 18 miles. Prashant, a born leader, soon organized the youth and elders of the village for pressurizing the local merchant to release rice stocks.

The innovative youngster made children lie on the sand with utensils on them so as to attract helicopter sorties to drop food for them. An optimist by nature, he got the children playing games of cricket to uplift spirits, and mobilized women for child care activities and men to secure food and materials. A highly cooperative individual he soon joined hands with volunteer NGOs to mend broken lives, and share others’ pains instead of wallowing in his own grief.

Question 3.
In adversity, people like Prashant get extraordinary determination and power to fight. Do you agree that adversity or crisis brings people closer?
Answer:
Yes, it is true that some people, like Prashant, get extraordinary powers in adverse conditions. They become heroes. In the story, it was extraordinary courage and strong determination that made Prashant go to his house to seek his family. He covered his eighteen-kilometre long journey with great difficulty. There was a leader in him, although he was a teenager. He had a special quality of taking initiatives.

He helped all and one during the disaster. He organized a team of volunteers to help the victims of super cyclone in Orissa. Adversity or crisis also brings people together. There is a bond of humanity. The victims of cyclone in Ersama helped one another. They worked together during their resettlement. They took care of orphans and widows. Prashant managed to unite them and work for one another.

The Brave Little Bowman Question and Answers